Primates and Primatology Flashcards

1
Q

Name the distinctive features of mammals

A
  • hair- fur
  • sweat glands
  • mammary glands (milk production)
  • 3 middle ear bones
  • specialised teeth
  • 4 chamber heart
  • neocortex in brain (outer layer involved with cognitive ability)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Name the characteristics of primates

A
  • clavicle (allows for arm movements/living in trees, locomotion)
  • opposable thumbs (ability to grasp, precision grip)
  • fingernails
  • binocular and colour vision
  • generalised dentition (allows omnivore diet)
  • slow reproductive rates (lower fertility rates than expected for size)
  • larger brains than expected for body weight
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Name different classes of primates

A
  • prosimians
  • Tarsiers
  • Platyrrhines (New world monkeys)
  • cercopithecines
  • colobines
  • Apes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe Madagascan Prosimians (including examples

A

Examples:
- Brown ruffed Lemue (Varecia rubra)
- Ring-tailed Lemur (Lemur catta)
- Aye-aye (Daubentonia madagascarensis)
- Mouse Lemur (Lemur pusillus)

Characteristics:
- small size
- eat insects/fruit
- mainly solitary
- most ancient
- rely on smell so have snout/muzzle
- specialised glands
- Aye Aye are solitary
- in Lemurs, females are dominant
- most are nocturnal
- Males home-ranges larger than female‘s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe African and Asian Prosimians

A

Examples:
- Angwantibo (Arctocebus spp.)
- Lorises (Loris spp.)
- Potto (Perodicticus spp.)
- Bushbabies (Galago spp.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe Tarsiers

A
  • south eastAsoa
  • endangered
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe Platyrrhines

A
  • South and Central America
  • members of the group help to raise offspring of dominant couple
  • see world in 2 colours

Examples:
- marmosets
- tamarins (saguinus spp.)
- Capuchins (Cebus spp.)

Characteristics:
- Variable body size
- Dichromatic vision
- Group-living- often cooperative breeders
- Mostly diurnal
- Variable social systems (harems, multi-male multi-female)
- Capuchins: „chimpanzees of America“

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe Cercopithecines

A
  • Africa and Asia
  • varied diet
  • multiple males and females in groups
  • multi-chambered stomach

Examples:
- Baboons (papio spp.)
- Mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx)
- Macaques (Macaca spp.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe Colobines

A
  • Africa and Asia
  • 1 male unit
  • Infanticide occurs

Examples:
- colobes
- leaf-momekeys
- snub-nosed monkeys

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe Apes

A
  • larger brain
  • live during day

Examples:
- Gibbons
Orang-utangs
- gorillas
- chimpanzees
- Bonobos
- Humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Discuss different ways of studying primates

A
  • Observation vs experiments
  • Field vs captivity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Name advantages and disadvantages of studying primates in capivity

A
  • advantage- can con tool extraneous variables such as diet and interaction
  • disadvantage- behaviour will not necessarily be ecological relevant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is adaptation

A
  • characteristics that improve an organism‘s chances for survival and/or reproduction
  • functional traits passed down through the next generations
  • maintained through evolution and selection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe the process of selection

A
  • variation present amongst individuals (due to genes)
  • selective pressures- affect ability to survive and reproduce e.g.:
  • biotic environment (climate/habitat/substrate),
  • biotic environment (food, predators, diseases, other species, attraction, competition- intraspecific)
  • some individuals survive and others don’t
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the mechanisms of selection in natural vs sexual selection

A
  • natural- survival and reproduction
  • sexual- reproduction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

outline genetic drift

A
  • bottleneck- only few individuals survive- distribution of characteristics change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are 3 factors needed for adaptation/selection

A
  • variation in traits
  • heritability of traits
  • selective pressures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Name different domains of primate adaptations/functional traits and the selective pressure that causes the,

A
  • limbs- habitat
  • teeth- diet
  • sense/brain- food/diurnal life/ sociality
  • life history (birth, death etc)- large brain 9developmental and energetic constraints)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are homologous chatracteristics

A

Present in a common ancestor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are analogous characteristics

A
  • present in some apes/primates (not common ancestor)
  • caused by convergent evolution (e.g. birds and bats both developed wings)
  • evolved later in humans
  • aka homoplasy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What does the comparative approach allow

A
  • Identification of correlated factors
  • Build evolutionary theories e.g. look at skull shape from fossil evidence- can understand evolutionary history e.g. when specific organisms walked
  • Infer selective processes (e.g. how behaviour is shaped by social and environmental conditions)
  • Infer events of convergent evolution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Outline primate limbs and locomotion

A
  • hand/feet- high prehensility
  • 5 digits
  • opposable thumb- allows hook to swing from branch ti branch, also use tail
  • divergent and partially posable big toe
  • nails instead of Claws
  • tactile pads with enriched sensory nerves of digits tips- precision of manipulation of objects
    –> 55 million years ago then lineage of primates emerged, had to rely more on catching preys- had to find fruit in trees
  • presence of clavicle- mobile arms and shoulders- pre-adaptation for tool use
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Outline differing locomotion in primates

A
  • clinging/leaping e.g. galago
  • quadrupedalism e.g. lemurs
  • brachiation- hangers e.g. spider monkeys
  • bipedalism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Outline the comparative approach in terms of primate limbs and locomotion

A
  • can compare skeletons e.f. of arboreal and terrestrial- terrestrial has stretched upper limbs whereas arboreal is using low strides- different behaviour results in morphological differences e.g. relative length of bones
  • can compare hand shapes and bones etc- link between bone structure and locomotion- can infer locomotion of evolutionary ancestors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Describe primate diet and teeth

A
  • generalised dentition- adapted to diverse diet- lack of specialisation
  • baboons and chimpanzees omnovorse- leaves, seeds etc
  • some more specialisations:
  • cercopithecines- frugivores (fruits)
  • colobines/gorlias- folivores (leaves/grass)- specialised multiplee chambers
  • some prosimians- insectivores (arthropods)
  • due to changes in gut and teeth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Describe the comparative approach in relation to diet and teeth

A
  • distantly related primates- similar diet associated with certain tooth form
  • similarity in characteristics corresponds to convergent evolution (homoplacy) and adaptive characteristics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Describe variationn in primate teeth which isn’t to do with diet

A
  • sexual dimporphism- occur differently in male and females of same species e.g. short vs long k9s in makkaks
  • different teeth length due to competition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Describe primates neural adaptations

A
  • allometric scaling- compare brain size relative to body size- most allocated above allometric line
  • general law is that correlates with body size, adaptation is when above/below
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Describe primates sensory adaptations

A
  • Rely on vision rather than olfaction- reduced snout, flat nose, reduction of olfaction brain structures
  • morphological adaptations- skull, eyes, brain
  • Colour vision (2/3)
  • stereotypic vision (3D, right nd left visual fields cross)- allows to live in trees, catch insects to side
  • forward facing eyes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

describe the primate life history

A

Lite hosiery is timing and pace of major life events:
gestation - birth- growth- maturation- reproduction- senescence- death (no menopause)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

describe adaptation in the primate life history

A
  • slow reproductive rates and fertility rates greater longevity
  • large brains causes slow maturation and growth, which therefore causes slow life history
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

describe consequences of the slow life history in primates

A
  • Intense parental/maternal care
  • Great dependence on flexible learned behaviour e.g. orangoutangs from mothers
  • Life in social groups
  • Mostly diurnal
  • Stable groups
  • Long-term relationships
  • Cooperation
  • Overlapping generations
  • Social learning, cultures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

outline biological classification

A
  • taxonomy- description, identification, nomenclature and classification of organisms
  • Carl Linnaeus- 18th century
  • based on common characteristics
  • DMPCOFGS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

outline species

A
  • 180-300 primate species
  • definitions- either cant reproduce (biological barrier), cant meet (geographic barrier), sometimes unclear- hybrids e.g. humans and neadrathals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Describe Cercopithecines and Colobines characteristics

A
  • Variable body size
  • Group-living
  • Hierarchical dominance
  • Female philopatry
  • Variable social systems
    (harems, multi-male multi-female)
  • Strictly diurnal
  • Sexual dimorphism
  • Colobines: folivores, „cow“ stomach, harem systems, infanticide common
    -Cercopithecines: frugivores/omnivores, cheek pouches, multi-male multi- female, female sexual swellings (not in guenons)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

describe characteristics of lesser apes

A
  • Gibbons and Siamangs
  • No tail Monogamous
  • Duet song
  • Male and female dispersal
  • Strictly diurnal
  • Brachiation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

ape characteristics

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

List the requirements of a primates diet

A

Provides energy for growth and essential elements for locomotion and nutrition
- carbohydrates- sugar
- amino acids
- fat/oil- energy storage
- vitamins/minerals
- water
- AVOID- toxins incl. tannins, caffein, alkaloids

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Where do primates obtain required nutritional elements from

A
  • carbohydrates- fruits, seeds, gum
  • proteins- young leaves, arthropods, animal preys
  • fat and oil- seeds, animal preys
  • vitamins and minerals- fruits, animal preys, geophagy (earth elements e.g. clay/rocks)
  • water- food, tree holes, water holes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Describe how primates can get access to water from tree holes

A
  • tool use- fluid dipping- wooden sticks- chew end (used by chimpanzees), also used for honey
  • leaf sponges
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

outline other feeding strategies in primates

A
  • sits on branches and pushes ground to get termites and ants
  • nut cracking- pounding techniques, Woden hammer
  • tortoise pounding- Catcha and kill tortoises to extract meat
  • oyster cracking in long tail macaques

–> use of social learning
–> similar techniques across species

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Outline the influence of colour and stereotypic vision on feeding strategies

A
  • some can see in 2/3 colours
  • colour vision allows to see varying degrees of brightness of fruits
  • can see in 3D- can capture moving oral and move in trees
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Outline the influence of colour and stereotypic vision on feeding strategies

A
  • shape of teeth adapted to certain diets
  • longer dinger in aye-aye
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Outline frugivory (what it is, competeition, issues)

A
  • eat mostly fruits
  • fruits are source of sugars and carbohydrates
  • resources worth fighting for
  • issues- patchy and seasonal distribution/production, Hugh unpredictability, monopolisable, variation between years as well as within
  • causes contest completion due to clumped resources- resources are scarce and valuable
  • vertical distribution of fruits and ripeness- causes vertical contest competition- best fruits at top (as sunlight)- female chimpanzees that are dominant can have highest reach in trees
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Outline folivory

A
  • eat leaves and grass
  • provides source of fibres and proteins
  • scramble competition as resources evenly dispersed- once fid, eat as much as can
  • resources not worth fighting over, no direct competition
  • hard to monopolise
  • issues- secondary components, hard to digest, toxic- so developed stomach with multiple chambers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Outline insectivory (what it is, competition, issues)

A
  • source of proteins and fat
  • moving preys- harder to catch
  • scramble competition
  • means occupy different heights- niche partitioning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Outline movements influenced by food availability and distribution

A
  • depending on how much food availability, have different travelling distance
  • travel less during day in times of low food availability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Outline fission-fusion (troops) influenced by food availability and distribution

A

Chimpanzees:
- party size changes
- when low food, party size decreases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Outline resource defence influenced by food availability and distribution

A
  • core area defence- more food in core
  • food patch defence- no difference between food in core and periphery
  • boundary defence- more food in periphery
  • size of core vs periphery area and different stability of resources affects formation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Outline spatial memory effected by food acquisition

A
  • primates need too remember location of feeding sites so can return to certain areas ay certain seasons
  • can map routes taken by primates- if know location, shoudlnrtravel in direct line at greater speed, rather than trial and error
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Outline niche partitioning

A
  • partition selves
  • differ in food specialisation
  • sympatric species
  • allows to form large groups of multiple species- interspecific associations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

outline anticipation in primates

A
  • e.g. anticipate eating figs at first time of day
  • leave earlier to site in order to be first at trees- leave first for fogs as most sought after
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Outline interspecific associations

A
  • improves foraging efficiency as can occupy strata in first that dent usually occupy
  • increase of arthropod intake when in association- broader niche
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

name predators of primates

A
  • snakes
  • birds
  • cats
  • humans
  • fossa
  • Komodo dragons
  • dogs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

name anti predation strategies

A
  • grouping- dilution effect (Hugh number of potential targets), confusion effects (leave in many different directions)- interspecific association
  • sleeping sites- nests building (apes), cliff sleeping sites (lemurs, geladas)
  • alarm call systems- inform other animals and others in group

Responses cam be differential e.g. for leopards use referential alarm calls and climb trees, whereas for eagles use referential alarm calls and go down from trees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

alarm call systems graphs

A

type of calls different for each type of predator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

Outline the co-evolution principle (ecological importance of primates)

A
  • Reciprocal evolutionary changes between pairs of species or groups as they interact with one another
  • angiosperm co-evolution hypothesis-our primate ancestors evolved key adaptations like forward-facing eyes, excellent colour vision, rounded, blunt teeth and fingers without claws, all for the purpose of eating and living from fruits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

outline the visual predation hypothesis

A

forward-facing eyes and grasping hands evolved in primates to allow them to eat insects in trees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

describe other ecological importances of primates

A
  • seed dispersal- pre dispersal, dispersal, and post dispersal
  • high percentage of seeds are not desyroyed- all primate wither spit or swallow seeds away from original tree- causes tree growth in different areas
  • prefer to groom in open areas away from trees- causes greater dispersal
  • NWM + OWM specialized in colourful fruits with flesh with seeds easy to swallow
  • High number of seeds and species dispersed
  • High number of seeds dispersed over long distances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

Give details of the life history of primates (including time periods)

A
  • late maturation –> long juvenile period –> long maternal investment (lactation, carrying, protection)
  • Slow reproduction: average inter-birth interval 2.3 years (max 7-8 years orang-utans)
  • Single offspring (max. 2 Callitrichids)
  • trade of between longer life and limited number of offspring- invest energy into current offspring rather than next generation
  • low adult mortality, long reproductive career, long life span, females outlive males
  • Little Mama- died at 79
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

What is sexual selection

A
  • Selective process acting on behaviour and traits that maximise reproduction (form of natural selection with focus on reproduction rather than survival)
  • Trade-off between natural selection and sexual selection adaptive value of traits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

Describe intersexual vs intrasexual selection

A
  • InTRA- intimidating, deterring or defeating same sex rivals (competition for sex between members of same sex)
  • inTER- making themselves attractive to the opposite sex (mate choice), opposite sex reproductive strategies differ (and compete)- sexual conflict
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

What do all reproductive strategies do

A

Maximise lifetime reproductive success

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

Outline gender-differentiated patterns of sexual selection in males and females

A
  • males are ready to mate most of the time, whereas females are constrained by physiology (gestation/lactation) and maternal care
  • thus means there is a limited humber of receptive females
  • means that males compete yo access females (male-male competition), and females choose among potential mates (mate choice)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

Describe sexual dimorphism in terms of intrasexual selection

A

-male-male sexual competition
- males have larger body size
- use physical weaponry e..g size of k9
- vocal apparatus
- secondary sexual characteristics e.g. flanges in orangoutangs- develop after sexual maturity- depends on food availability
- body mass- relationship to mating systems in primates
- Higher sexual dimorphism in mating systems with one single reproductive male

66
Q

Outline intrasexual competition in terms of sperm competition

A
  • male-male sexual competition
  • relates to mating systems
  • sperm compete in female genital tract
  • reflected in tests size
  • chimpanzees large testes whereas gorillas small (as live in group with 1 reproductive male)
  • High sperm competition in multi-male societies
67
Q

Outline intersexual competition in terms of mate choice

A
  • Mate selection depends on attractiveness of certain traits
  • Traits related to resource holding potential (RHP)- capacity to provide protection, parental care, resources, good genes
  • RHP (often) given by honest signals (by males)- good genes- means healthy individual - ornaments in mandrills, douc lanurus and uakaris
  • e.g. brightly coloured male mandrils get more copulations- females approach more brightly coloured males, and present more to brightly coloured males- indirect indicator of good health
68
Q

Outline intersexual selection in primates in terms of sexual conflicts

A
  • interests of males and females differ
  • Males and females prefer different reproductive strategies to reach
    optimal fitness
  • Conflicting optimal fitness strategies concerning reproduction
  • Evolutionary arm race between males and females
69
Q

Outline intersexual selection in terms of reproductive strategies

A
  • male reproduction cheap- invest in numerous gametes with no energetic reserved- ready to mate most of time
  • female costly- invest in few gametes with high energetic reserves, invest in costly maternal investment (gestation, lactation, maternal care)
  • means for females reproductive mistakes are costly, makes females choosy, and means that males are limited by access to females
70
Q

Describe the implications of gender differing reproductive strategies on space use and competition

A
  • females- high investment so limited by the access to resources (food)
  • success determined by number of offspring they can produce
  • means compete among females for better resources (shorter inter-birth interval, higher survival, better offspring survival, better health)- causes to monopolise resources, dominance hierarchies and matrilines (dominance hierarchies passed onto daughters)
  • male- low investment- soserachc for more matings- so limited by access to females
71
Q

Outline dominance hierarchies in females

A
  • separate from hierarchies in males
  • indirect fitness advantages- access to food resources- higher rank forage more without moving (better physical condition for pregnancy)
  • direct fitness advantages- survival- better condition, reduced vulnerability to predation
  • faster reproduction (as shorter inter birth interval)
72
Q

Outline dominance hierarchies in males

A
  • reproductive sucess- leads to high variance in reproductive success
  • higher ranking males get more mating opportunities
  • means get high reproductive skew- limited number of rales get most offspring
  • when more males, less have change to mate
  • Maxaques- males in prime sire the most offspring- top sire in each year produced 24% of the infants, while 71% of troop males sired no offspring at all
73
Q

Outline sexual coercion (male reproductive strategies)

A
  • form of sexual conflict as done without consent of females
  • males attempt to bias mating in their favour by using harassment, intimidation and forced matings
  • leads to higher rate of potentially fertile matings, a lower rate for other potential mates, and costs for the females
  • cost for females so have developed counterstrategies- Costlier investment from females to counteract male sexual coercion
74
Q

outline female counterstrategies to male coercion

A
  • female coalitions
  • female dominance
  • “When females formed coalitions, 100% won against a target male(s)”
  • all targets of female coalitions were males, never to attack other males
75
Q

Outline infanticide as a male reproductive strategy

A
  • will commit infanticide if now they are not the father
  • Faster reproduction- species with lactational amenorrhea (infertility after giving birth due to lactation), short male tenure
  • Infants of other males targeted- New males should do it, no prior mating with females
  • High chance of siring new infants Dominant males, one-male groups
76
Q

Outline female counter strategies to infanticide

A
  • promiscuous mating- paternity confusion (means men not Sur if they are the father)- formation multi female and multi female social systems
  • synchrony of reproductive cycles- when cycling together, can mate with men from other units- one male cant keep access- confuse paternity
  • post-partum oestrus- lactation reduced, so infanticide doesn’t occur when lactation longer (no postpartum oestrus, infanticide common)
  • male-female association- e.g. baboons- pair bonding - more time spent with male after birth- protection against other males, decreases after death of infant
77
Q

Outline female defence as a male reproductive strategy

A
  • Males defend access to one or more females directly
  • long-term associations- monogamous bonds and harems
  • dominance hierarchies in mixed sex groups, dominant males have priority of access, and short term censorship nonds
  • coercion- males physically force females to
78
Q

Input to social systems diagram

A
79
Q

Outline dispersed solitary social systems

A
  • Males‘ home-range > females‘ home-range
  • Forage alone
  • Social contact via vocal + olfaction (scent marking)
  • Often nocturnal, sleep in trees in day
  • polygynous- each male mates with several females
  • prosimians and orangutangs
80
Q

Outline pair bonded social systems

A
  • one male one female
  • teritorial defence
  • monogamous (sometimes extra-pair copulations)
  • paternal offspring care
  • Titi monkeys, owl monkeys, some callitrichids (marmosets, tamarins), Hylobatids (gibbons and siamangs)
81
Q

Outline one female multi male social systems

A
  • Cooperative breeding
  • Reproduction of subordinate females (daughters) suppressed by aggression or pheromonal signals
  • Polyandrous- more than one mating male- cooperative polyandry
  • Marmosets, tamarins
82
Q

Outline one male social systems (Harem)

A
  • Single reproductive adult male defends a territory with several females and subordinate males
  • Exclusive mating access
  • Polygynous
  • Bachelor groups
  • High risk of infanticide
  • Sexual dimorphism due to high male-male competition
  • Colobes, langurs, guenons, patas, howler monkeys, gorillas
83
Q

Outline multi male multi female social systems

A
  • Polygynandrous
  • Males and females mate with several members of the oposite sex
  • Female philopatry
  • Matrilines
  • Exaggerated sexual swellings common
  • Macaques, most baboons, vervet monkeys, capuchins, spider monkeys, wooly monkeys, some langurs and some lemurs
84
Q

Outline fission- fusion communities

A
  • Temporary sub-groupings depending on food conditions
  • Male philopatry
  • Female dispersal
  • spider monkeys, colobus, chimpanzees, baboons
85
Q

Outline multi-level societies

A

Three-levels of social structure:
- one male units- reproductive (one male, multi female)
- bands- ecological (forage together)
- troop temporary aggregations
- polygynous
- infanticide
- Hamadryas baboons, geladas, sub-nosed monkeys

86
Q

Primate mating systems diagram

A
87
Q

List impacts on primate social systems

A
  • social structure (size and composition)
  • mating system
  • social organisation (interactions, space-use, competition, dispersal, philopatry)
88
Q

Outline costs of primate sociality

A
  • Competition for food
  • Competition for mates
  • Competition for space
  • Disease transmission
  • Infanticide
89
Q

Outline benefits of primate sociality

A
  • searching for food
  • reduced predation risks
  • competition with other groups
  • mating opportunities
  • friendships- social bonding
  • social learning opportunities
90
Q

Outline the heuristic approach to primate socio-ecology

A
  • aim at explaining all forms of primate social organisations
  • Models stemmed from natural history, improved by concepts of inclusive fitness (when harmful for self but benefit for genetic relatives), selfish herd (putting another before predator) and parental investment
  • Causal relationships between food distribution, predation, mating strategies, social organisations and relationships
91
Q

Outline comparative primate socio-ecology

A

Van Schaik, 1989:
- Multi-females groups initially favoured by predation
- Food competition determines female social relationships within and between groups
- competition regimes- contest vs scramble

92
Q

Outline contest competition regimes

A
  • clumped resources
  • resources scarce and valuable
  • resources worth fighting over
  • resources are monopolizable
  • direct competition
93
Q

Outline scramble competition regimes

A
  • dispersed (insects) or evenly (leaves) ditributed resources
  • scramble to get enough
  • resources are not monopolizable
  • resources not worth fighting over
  • no direct competition
94
Q

Outline female relationships in primate socio-ecology

A

Van Schaik, 1989:
- consequence of two types of competition (scramble and contest), and whether within or between group competition
- scramble competition within group- females develop individualistic, egalitarian dominance hierarchies
(Type A)
- when high predation pressure, scramble competition within group and contest competition between group creates philopatric females and egalitarian hierarchies (type C)
- contest competition within groups means females develop nepotistic, despotic dominance hierarchies (type B)
- contest competition between-group when low predation pressure and high population density creates nepotistic, egalitarian hierarchies (type D)

95
Q

outline ecological model of private socio-ecology including the influence of infanticide avoidance

A
  • when low predation, high risk of infanticide
  • female dispersal and association with resident males
  • Sterck et al, 1997- new labels to van Schaik model
  • type A- dispersal-egalitarian
  • type B- resident nepotistic
  • Type C- resident-egalitarian
  • type D– resident-nepotistic-tolerant
96
Q

Outline factors that contribute to female social relationships in primates

A

Sterck et al, 1997:
- food distribution and predation risk effects female gregariousness
- infanticide risk effects how females associate with males, which may lead to females sharing the same protector male, which also influence gregariousness
- gregariousness effects attachment of males, ad creates a competitive regime (ethic is also affected by habitat saturation)
- this creates social relationships

97
Q

Outline an example of the impact of varying levels of within-group contest competition on primate socio-ecology (across species and sites)

A

Across species- Mitchell et al, 1991:
- Saimiri oerstedi of Costa Rica (high WGCC) compared to Saimiri sciureus of Peru (low WGCC)- similar predation level and group size
- higher WGCC lead to linear dominance hierarchies and female philopatry
- low WGCC lead to a lack of linear dominance hierarchies, and creation of female dispersal

Across sites- Koeing et al, 1998:
- presbytis entellus of southern Nepal and India across two sites
- same patterns as above found for high vs low WGCC across the sites

98
Q

Outline the link between scramble competition within group and group size

A
  • should support large group sizes, but group sizes relatively small in reality
  • may be due to folivore paradox- patch depletion may limit group size expansion
  • female reproductive success may be better in intermediate group sizes
  • females may disperse to avoid male harassment/infanticide
99
Q

Outline examples of inconsistencies in primate socio-ecology

A
  • Saj et al, 2007- Colobus vellerosus- folivore- more F-F affiliation than F-M affiliation, demale dispersal, no female coalitions over food and low F-F grooming- suggests dispersal-egalitarian- may be response to risk of infanticide
  • chimpanzees and bonobos- frugivores- female philopatry predicted,, but find male philopatry; no female hierarchy expected, but see linear female dominance hierarchy and bonobo female coalitions
100
Q

Outline potential additional factors to the socio-ecological model in primates

A
  • role of phylogenetic constraints- some traits inherited and so conserved independent of ecological conditions
  • role of male mating strategies on female-female competition?
  • constraints on group size enforce female dispersal?
  • demography alters rates of alliances and aggression?
  • quantification of predation pressure and competition- lack of method standardisation
101
Q

Outline the links between predation and female gregariousness

A
  • De Ruiter, 1986- wedge-capped capuchins- predation benefits of group living- allows more scanning
  • increased time spent in vigilance when in small groups
  • Large groups occupy lower strata, small groups occupy higher strata
102
Q

Outline the link between infanticide risk and female gregariousness in primates

A
  • leads to association with likely father
  • mountain gorillas- female transfer subsequent or simultaneous to infanticide- females join the infanticidal male (Watts, 1989)
103
Q

Strengths and limitations of the primate socio-ecological model

A

Strengths:
- appropriate model to explain primate social systems
- food distribution, predation and infanticide risk as main determinants
- contest vs scramble competition

Limitations:
- Inconsistencies to relate competition, dispersal and social relationships
- folivore paradox

104
Q

Outline co-operation

A
  • Biological process where individuals or groups act together
  • can be between different species where both benefit (mutualism), or between the same species where there are common benefits (group living)
  • widespread phenomenon across living organisms e.g. for sociality, anti-predation, forging efficiency, hunting success, thermoregulation, territorial defence, paternal care, and cooperative breeding
105
Q

Outline cooperation in relation to evolution

A
  • evolutionary puzzle
  • natural selection- favoured behaviour enhances success of individuals
  • cooperation, however, mean that behaviour has cost for the cooperator
  • involves alturism- Behaviour that benefits the fitness of the recipient at a fitness cost for the giver/actor- creates risk of exploitation by self-interested free-riders
106
Q

List theories of evolution of cooperation

A
  • kin selection
  • reciprocal alturism
  • group selection
107
Q

Outline the kin selection model of cooperation

A

Smith, 1964; Queller, 1992:
- Cooperation with family members
- An altruistic allele can improve its prevalence in the gene pool by promoting the success of the same allele in other individuals
- Individuals increase their inclusive fitness by being altruistic to relatives, who share a portion of their genes
- Hamilton rule- altruism evolves when the costs are smaller than the benefits multiplied with degree of relatedness of benefits
- inclusive fitness involves individual own fitness, as well as fitness of each relative- weighted by the degree of relatedness

108
Q

Outline the reciprocal altruism model of cooperation

A

Trivers, 1971:
- individuals cooperate with those that cooperate with them
- If costs of cooperation are low and benefits are high, altruistic alleles can spread by mutually promoting their success
- individuals reciprocate altruistic acts, leading to the development of long-term social relationships

109
Q

Outline the group selection model of cooperation

A

Wilson, 1975; Smith, 1976:
- Groups of cooperators outcompete groups of non-cooperators

110
Q

Outline the influence of social relationships on cooperation

A
  • social relationships are made of dominance and friendship
  • have rocks of aggression, passive benefits of tolerance near resources, and active benefits of exchange off commodities (grooming, food sharing, and antagonistic support)
  • risk and benefit balance modulated by kinship, friendship and reciprocity
  • proximity may be proxy for friendship
111
Q

Outline the influence of grooming on social relationships

A
  • most important way to form friendships
  • other benefits: reduces stress, reduce parasitic load
  • often bottom-up (give-receive)
    -market commodity (grooming vs tolerance, grooming vs mating, grooming vs protection, grooming vs support)
    -can be reciprocated
  • tolerance vs grooming in tufted capuchins (Tiddi et al, 2011)- More tolerance over food after reciprocal grooming, More grooming after being tolerant at food resources- market commodity that can be exchanged and reciprocated
112
Q

Outline fitness advantages of friendships in primates

A
  • Silk et al, 2009- influence of kinship on bonding- Wild baboons associate more with related individuals
  • Females more social (with kin and non-kin) have offspring that survive better
  • Silk et al, 2010- Wild baboons females with consistent stable relationships live longer
  • Langergraber, 2007- Male chimpanzees- stable, long-lasting, reciprocal bonds, cooperation influenced by kinship, but also by bonds among non-related individuals
  • Feldblum et al, 2021- Wild subordinate chimpanzees are more likely to sire if they have strong bonds with the alpha male
113
Q

Outline food sharing in relation to cooperation

A
  • chimpanzees- passive (tolerant) and active food sharing- active more rare
  • reinforce social bonds
  • link between sense of fairness and cooperation- more cooperative if have sense of fairness
114
Q

Animal behaviour culture definition

A

behavioural practice that is shared among members of a group; is performed repeatedly over a period of time (enduring); and depends to a measurable degree on social contributions to individual learning for its appearance in new practitioners (Fragazy, 2003)

115
Q

Define traditions in animal behaviour

A
  • all group-typical behaviour patterns, shared by members of animal communities, that are to some degree reliant on socially learned and transmitted information (Laland & Hoppit, 2003)
  • traditions are cultural traits (behaviours)- culture is made by the summation of them
  • generalised definition including both- Behaviours that are practiced habitually in a group, rely in maintenance and transmission on social learning (McGrew, 2004)
116
Q

Outline different cultiral domains in animals

A
  • tool use
  • social-sexual (greetings/gestures)
  • communication (associative vocalisations, dialects)
  • feeding (feeding preferences, hunting techniques)
117
Q

List different ways of measuring cultural behaviour in animals

A
  • method of exclusion
  • comparing populations within site
  • counting socially learned skills
118
Q

List different explanations of culture in animals

A
  • 3 factor model
  • social learning
119
Q

Humanities culture definition

A

shared patterns of behaviours and interactions, cognitive constructs and understanding that are learned by socialization- growth of a group identity fostered by social patterns unique to the group

120
Q

Outline the method of exclusion (measuring cultural behaviour)

A
  • Compare study sites
    -List all behaviours
    -Exclude those explained by genetic differences
    -Exclude those explained by ecological differences
    -Exclude universal behaviours
121
Q

Outline findings about animal culture using the method of exclusion

A

Whiten et al, 1999:
- chimpanzee cultures in different study sites, e.g. Tai forest, Gombe
- found 39 cultural variants across social, sexual, and feeding domains
- found different functionality of behaviour e.g. some use for sexual, others for grooming

Van Schaik et al, 2003:
- orang-utang populations
- found 24 variants across social and feeding domains
- Cultural variation increases with geographic distance
- Size of cultural repertoire associated with opportunities for cultural learning- more culture if more chances for social learning

Ranger et al, 2002:
- capuchins foraging traditions
- 20 foods processed differently across sites

122
Q

Outline issues with the method of exclusion for measuring animal culture

A
  • Ecological pressures drive adaptive behaviour which can also be cultural (as socially learnt
  • Genetics influence animal’s predisposition for social learning
  • Animals modify their environment, also via culture (niche construction)
  • Universal behaviour can also be cultural (e.g. nest-building)
  • Distant populations: can’t rule out influence of genetic and ecology
123
Q

Outline the method of comparing populations within site to measure cultural behaviour in animals

A
  • compare neighbouring populations within the same site
  • have same habitat, and are same sub species
124
Q

Outline findings about animal culture using within site comparison

A

Luncz et al, 2012:
- 3 neighbouring chimpanzee communities
- nut cracking behaviour
- Stone tool use habits vary between neighbouring communities
- wooden tool use habits also vary

Luncz & Boesh, 2014:
- Nut-cracking traditions perpetuate through generations and remain
- conformity exhibited- all members of same group behave similarly, new immigrants conform to new group’s tradition

Koops, 2015:
- ant dipping tool length in Kalinzu forest (chimpanzees)
- length varies widely across chimpanzee study sites, across type of army ants and across dipping locations
- varies within the same population between two neighbouring communities- even when same type of ants and same dipping locations

125
Q

Outline counting socially learned skills to measure cultural behaviour in animals

A

Schuppli & van Schaik, 2019:
- measures increase in general cultural repertoire
- can modify distribution of variants across behavioural domains
- reveals ecological correlates for most cultural elements
- suggests culture drives local adaptations, and is widespread and pervasive

126
Q

Outline findings from counting socially learned skills to measure cultural behaviour in animals

A

Schuppli & van Schaik, 2019:
- orang-utans cultures- Tuanan vs Suaq
- Tuanan less sociable, and have less social learning opportunities
- greater difference between populations found than when using method of exclusion
- found ecological correlations- e.g. feeding skills necessitated by ecological conditions
- some behaviours culturally universal, but still socially learnt

127
Q

Outline the 3 factor model of culture

A

Koop et al, 2014:
- Environment, sociality and cognition
- Considers influence of environment, sociality and cognition on culture (particularly material culture)
- Environmental opportunity, rather than necessity is main driver of material culture
- supported by Koops (2014)- ant dipping and nut cracking increases when more available, but ant still increases when more food available in general (showing matter of opportunity not necessity)

128
Q

Individual vs social learning definition

A
  • Individual- acquiring information/skills without other‘s influence- trial/error, takes time
  • social- learning influenced by observation of, or interaction with, another individual or its products- fast
129
Q

Stages of social learning

A
  • Imitation- copy the behaviour of the role model
  • emulation- understanding of the goals of action (observational learning)
  • facilitation- increased level of effort as a result of others‘ presence
  • teaching- Active modification of actions by the role model to improve performance
130
Q

Outline the link between social learning and tradition

A

innovation becomes cultural (tradition) when it gets fixed within a population

  • innovation is copied by observation (social learning)- then transmission occurs, then becomes tradition when fixed
131
Q

Outline two types of transmission in social learning

A
  • horizontal- within same generation
  • vertical- between generations
132
Q

Outline examples of foxed vs unfixed innovation (social learning)

A

Leca et al, 2010- Japanese macaques:
- unfixed- dental flossing- spontaneous innovation, variable techniques, one innovator- didn’t spread in group or to next generations-
- fixed- sweet potato washing, wheat placer mining
- potential reasons for being unfixed- group may be too big, not enough kin, low-ranking female, may not be functional

133
Q

Link culture and ecological need/nature

A
  • culture is natural process
  • exists as soon as opportunity, need and skills present
  • exists in many animals
  • primate technologies- roots of technological evolution model
134
Q

Outline human culture

A
  • cumulative culture- gradually improve techniques
  • ratchet effect- build on what predecessors have invented, innovations jump from one mind to the next, throughout the population
  • potentially more active teaching
  • role of written and spoken language
  • strong power of normativity
  • cultural an biological evolution (dual inheritance)
135
Q

Define cognition

A

the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses- involves perception, judgement and action/response

136
Q

Define intelligence

A

Ability to easily learn or understand and to deal with new and difficult situations- involves the notions of adaptability and flexibility

137
Q

Outline cognitive abilities

A

learning, understanding causality, reasoning, memorising and processing memories, communicating- influences behavioural flexibility, behavioural complexity, modification of actions and environment, manipulation

138
Q

Outline types of cognition

A
  • Physical cognition- how information about the physical world is acquired, processed and used- involves spatial, timing, and numerical cognition
  • social cognition- how information in and from social contexts are acquired, processed and used- involves social learning, theory of mind, and social emotion
139
Q

Outline methods of studying cognition

A
  • comparative cognition- can compare non-human primates and humans- mechanisms and origins- proximate (process/use) and ultimate (evolutionary relation)
  • lab experiments- good as controlled, can specify individual task, can use replicable paradigms; BUT lack of ecological relevance and uses captive populations
  • field studies- good as ecologically relevant; BUT observations often anecdotal, hard to control all parameters, ethical issues, experiments hard to realise
140
Q

Outline the link between brain and cognition

A
  • Primates have larger brains than what would be expected relative to their body size (Roth & Dicke, 2005)
  • High energetic requirement- 2% of body weight, but consume 20% of energy
  • Expensive to maintain large brains
  • large brains associated with higher global cognitive abilities (Deaner et al, 2007)
141
Q

List different hypotheses regarding evolution of intelligence

A
  • ecological intelligence hypothesis
  • social intelligence hypothesis
  • Machiavellian intelligence hypothesis
  • Cultural intelligence hypothesis
142
Q

Compare selection pressure na challenges in ecological vs social intelligence hypotheses of cognition evolution

A
  • ecological- ecological election pressure (resources)- challenges are finding, locating, extracting, obtaining resources
  • social- social selection pressure (conspecifics)
143
Q

Outline elements of the ecological intelligence hypothesis

A

Intelligence/cognition effects:
- where search for food
- where and when memorise food locations
- and how access food times
- involves cognitive abilities of spatial memory, associative learning, and explorativeness

144
Q

Outline findings on spatial memory as part of the ecological intelligence hypothesis

A
  • Garber, 1989- marmoset use of euclidian map- can remember location of food resources up to 3 years after accessing- mental map can be manipulated and oriented- can travel from any place (not just one direction)
  • Normand & Boesch, 2009- similar in chimpanzees (euclidian map)
  • Erhart & Overdorff, 2008- prosimians- route-based maps, use of landmark- travel in straight lines, use backtracking, influence of topography- limited in ways to approach but can still manipulate in ones
  • De Guinea et al, 2021-black howler monkeys- influence of topography/substrates- Euclidian maps as they arrive at same trees from multiple directions, but contained movement patterns due to limited access of aboreal routes between trees- multiple directions but limited number
145
Q

Outline findings on searching for good as part of the ecological intelligence hypothesis

A
  • difficulty of cognitive challenge varies based on food sources- e.g. fruits dispersed and seasonal, so greater challenge than leave as evenly distributed and not seasonal
  • Harvey et al, 1980- Frugivore species have larger brains than folivore species
  • DeCasien et al, 2017- Primate brain size predicted by diet: frugivore > omnivore > folivore
  • Malsburg et al, 2020- Habitat generalists (hose that can thrive in many types of habitats e.g. macaques) outperform habitat specialists in cognitive tasks
146
Q

Outline findings on the extractive-foraging hypothesis as part of the ecological intelligence hypothesis

A
  • Gibson, 1986- Technological specializations in foraging as a result of cognitive abilities of great apes- adaptations for exploiting a variety of high-energy embedded foods through intelligent tool use and its social transmission e.g. dipping, fishing, excavating, opening resources e.g. termites, ants, honey, nut cracking- human evolution as result of year round dependency on tools
  • Parker, 2015- feeding requires complexity in processing good- social transmission of these makes up socio-ecological hypothesis- technological dexterity and prowess requires advanced cognition, in new/old world monkeys and great apes
147
Q

Outline social origins of intelligence according to the social intelligence hypothesis

A

Dunbar, 1992:
- Individualized relationships organized in a network
- Various relationship attributes- dominance, bond, kinship etc
- complex social networks- macaques (Pasquaretta et al, 2014) and in humans
- Keep track of own and others’ interactions- characterise identity of each individual
- advanced cognition needed for cooperation, competition and social strategizing

148
Q

Define social intelligence (social intellegene hypothesis)

A

understanding of identity, kinship, relative rank; showing flexible behaviour according to who does what

149
Q

List types of relationships explained by social intelligence hypothesis

A
  • dominance
  • coalitions
  • triadic interactions
  • fission-fusion
150
Q

Explain dominance relationships as part of the social intelligence hypothesis

A

Bergman et al, 2003:
- dominance relationships and relative rank
- Baboons recognize that a dominance hierarchy can be sub-divided into family groups based on individual attributes and membership in higher order groups

151
Q

Explain coalitions as part of the social intelligence hypothesis

A
  • more complex decisions based on differentiated relationships due to number of coalition partners as well as observable cues (e.g. large body size)
  • grooming reinforces social bonds needed for coalitions (need to monitor own/others relationships)
152
Q

Explain triadic interactions as part of the social intelligence hypothesis

A
  • Aureli et al, 1992- re-directed agression toward a low ranking kin of opponent (Macaques)- shows understanding of kin relations of other s
  • Wittig et al, 2007- 3rd party affiliation- Baboons reconciled on behalf of kin0 increased proximity post-conflict after learning of coalition
  • Silk, 1999- macaques- recruitment of 3rd party coalition partners
153
Q

Explain fission-fusion relationships as part of the social intelligence hypothesis

A
  • Amici et al, 2013:
  • variable subgrouping introduces uncertainty- hard to keep track of who hangs out/does what with who
  • promotes inhibitory control (separation of intuitions and long term desires)
  • F-F species show higher IC
154
Q

Outline findings on the social brain hypothesis as part of social intelligence hypothesis

A

Dunbar, 1998:
- Neocortex size (seat of cognitive process e.g. reasoning/consciousness) highly correlated with group size
- not significant relationship with tool extraction (against ecological hypothesis)

Kudo & Dunbar, 2001:
- Neocortex larger in species with larger grooming cliques
- Larger grooming networks in larger groups, larger grooming cliques in larger grooming networks
- suggest grooming clique/network as proxy for social complexity

Deaner et al, 2007:
- Cognitive abilities better predicted by overall brain size than by neocortex size

Als influence of neuronal circuits and pathways, and number of connections

155
Q

Outline the expensive brain hypothesis

A

Deaner et al, 2003:
- large brains associated with slow life history
- Life history constrain: slow development and low mortality
- brains: expensive tissue to develop and maintain
- Brain size and life span correlated

156
Q

Outline the machiavellian intelligence hypothesis

A

Whiten & Byrde, 1997:
- social intelligence hypothesis is not sufficient to explain higher abilities- social competition as well as interaction leads to machiavellian intelligence
- intense social competition means use machiavellian social strategies to achieve higher social status and fitness
- use of manipulation and deception requires ToM and self awareness - mental representation of others

157
Q

Outline findings on mental state representation in primates (machiavellian intelligence hypothesis)

A
  • Heyes, 1998- self representation (ToM)- mirror experiemnets- apes yes, monkeys no
  • Goossens et al, 2008- others knowledge- Macaques follow gaze of others (understand what others can see)
  • Hare et al, 2006- chimpanzee deception- conceal things from others and use hidden routes to access contested food
  • Osvath & Karvonen,2012- chimpanzees exhibit self representation, awareness of others knowledge, and false beliefs
158
Q

Outline the cultural intelligence hypothesis

A

Tomasello, 1999; Herrmann et al, 2007; van Schaik & Burkart, 2011:
- Social learning is more efficient than individual exploration
- Learning of skills faster with social learning
- Individual repertoire of learned skills boosted by frequent social learning opportunities
- Species with frequent opportunities for social learning can afford to increase cognitive power- means more heavily cultural species should be more intelligent

159
Q

Outline reserach supporting the cultural intelligence hypothesis

A

Foss et al, 2016
- zoo individuals (homogenous ecological conditions)- sumatran vs bornean orang-utans
- sumatran more social- exhibited superior innate problem solving, higher inhibition, and more cautious exploration style
- suggests stronger selection on cognitive mechanisms underlying learning in the more social species

160
Q

Outline integration of hypotheses of cognition/intelligence

A
  • Most likely a combination of ecological and social selective pressures
  • Evidence affected by choice of species, variables, analyses and definitions
  • Parker, 2015- Extractive foraging hypothesis finds support, but social learning, innovation and tool use also correspond to the cultural intelligence hypothesis
161
Q

Outline findings on intentionality in chimpanzees

A

Roberts et al, 2014:
- Language-trained chimpanzees
- Use intentional gestures to coordinate with an experimentally naive human to retrieve hidden food