furcation management parts 1 and 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Goals of Therapy
Arrest the?
Prevent further?
Regenerate?
Prevent?

A

Arrest the active disease
Prevent further loss of attachment
Regenerate lost periodontium
Prevent disease reoccurrence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Objectives of Furcation Therapy
Access for?
Access for?
Establish?

A

Access for home care
Access for maintenance
Establish physiologic bone and tissue architecture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

 Goldman-incipient or Glickman-Grade I furcations

A
  • Pocket formation into the flute of the
    furca, but the inter-radicular bone is
    intact.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

 Goldman-cul-de-sac or Glickman-Grade II furcation

A
  • Loss of inter-radicular bone with pocket formation of varying depths into the furca, but not completely through to the other side.
  • Can be shallow or deep
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

 Goldman-through and through or Glickman-Grade III

A
  • Complete loss of inter-radicular bone
    with pocket formation allowing probe to
    pass completely to the other side
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

 Glickman-Grade IV

A
  • Loss of attachment and gingival
    recession that has made the furcation
    clearly visible to clinical examination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

hamp classification, degrees?

A

Hamp- classification of the horizontal component of furcation involvement
* Degree 1: horizontal loss less than 3mm
* Degree 2: horizontal loss >3mm but not the total width of furcation area
* Degree 3: through and through

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Tanrow classification

A

Tarnow: classification of the vertical component of furcation involvement
* Subclass A: vertical loss up to 1/3 of furca (1-3 mm)
* Subclass B: vertical loss up to 2/3 of furca (4-6 mm)
* Subclass C: vertical loss into the apical third (>7mm)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Grade/Class II or Grade/Class III furcation involvement automatically places patient into what stages of periodontitis

A

Stage III or Stage IV Periodontitis.***

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Diagnosis of furcal involvement
 Clinically probing the furcations

A
  • Standard “straight” probing with a
    straight probe only measures the vertical attachment loss, and the extent of the horizontal loss will not be detected
  • “Curved” probing (Nabers) with a curved probe will determine the horizontal attatchement loss
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Location of furcation entrances for maxillary molar

A
  • Mesial furcation toward palatal 1/3 so probe from palatal
  • Distal furcation in mid 1/3 (under contact point) so probe from palatal (or buccal)
  • Buccal furcation from buccal!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Radiographic and Clinical Diagnosis
 Study looked at 72 pts with chronic
periodontitis and 90% of the 303 maxillary molars had furcation bone loss.
* % diagnosed by probing alone,
* % by radiographs alone and
* % diagnosed using both clinical and
radiographs.

A

 Study looked at 72 pts with chronic
periodontitis and 90% of the 303 maxillary molars had furcation bone loss.
* 3% diagnosed by probing alone,
* 22% by radiographs alone and
* 65% diagnosed using both clinical and
radiographs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

 Study evaluated 312 mandibular molars and 35% had furcation involvement.
* % were diagnosed by probing alone
* % diagnosed by radiographs alone,
* % diagnosed by a both of
radiographic and clinical examination.

A

 Study evaluated 312 mandibular molars
and 35% had furcation involvement.
* 9% were diagnosed by probing alone
* 8% diagnosed by radiographs alone,
* 18% diagnosed by a both of
radiographic and clinical examination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cervical Enamel Projections
* Grades?
 Incidence ranges? common demo?
 Implications of CEPs:

A
  • Grade I, II, III depending on extension
    towards and into the furcation
     Incidence ranges from 17-33% from
    various studies, (mandibular second molar has highest incidence). Studies of Asian populations have far higher incidence.
     Implications of CEPs: epithelial attachmen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

CEP grades

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Root Trunk Length
Maxillary first molars

A
  • Mesial: 3 mm
  • Facial: 4 mm
  • Distal: 5 mm
17
Q

Root Trunk Length Mand. first molars

A
  • Buccal: 3 mm
  • Lingual: 4 mm
  • (Also, note the inclination of the
    mandibular molars is to the midline)
18
Q

Surface Area of Maxillary 1st Molar

A
19
Q

Maxillary 1st
Bicuspid root trunk length

A

8mm

20
Q

Furcation Root Concavities
* Found % of time on mesial surface of
mandibular first molar and % on distal
surface?
* Found % on mesial-buccal, % on
distal-buccal, and % on palatal
surfaces of maxillary first molars?

A
  • Found 100% of time on mesial surface of mandibular first molar and 99% on distal surface
  • Found 94% on mesial-buccal, 31% on
    distal-buccal, and 17% on palatal
21
Q

Furcal concavities on the mandibular molars occur % on the mesial root and % on the distal root.

A

Furcal concavities on the mandibular molars occur 100% on the mesial root and 99% on the distal root.

22
Q

Concavities on the maxillary first molar
furcal root surfaces:
% on the mesio- buccal,(0.1 -0.7mm)
% on the distal-
buccal (0.1 mm)
% on the palatal root (0.1mm)

A

94% on the mesio- buccal,(0.1 -0.7mm)
31% on the distal- buccal (0.1 mm) and
17% on the palatal root (0.1mm) (C)

23
Q

Anatomical Considerations
 Furcation Entrance Diameter
 % are 1.0 mm or less
 % are 0.75 mm or less
 Width of new curette blade?
 Therefore?

A

 81% are 1.0 mm or less
 58% are 0.75 mm or less
 Width of new curette blade: 0.75-1.25 mm
 Therefore, 58% of furcations cannot be instrumented with hand instruments

24
Q

Anatomical Considerations
 Pulp interrelationship

A
  • Incidence of lateral canals is 28%** in
    furcation area
25
Q

Anatomical Considerations:
Bifurcational ridges at man molars

A
  • 73% of mandibular first molars have ridges in mesial-distal direction, and 63% have ridges in buccal-lingual direction
26
Q

Etiologies of Furcation Bone Loss

A

 Plaque (advancing plaque front)
 Developmental Anomalies
 Iatrogenic
 Pulpal Involvement (via lateral canals, endo-perio lesions)
 Occlusal Trauma