Interdependence Flashcards

1
Q

What is the basic formula for outcomes in interdependence theory

A

Outcomes = rewards - costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why do different outcomes result in different levels of satisfaction according to interdependence theory

A
  • Because satisfaction depends not only on our outcome but also on our comparison level
  • We are only satisfied if our outcome exceeds our comparison level

Satisfaction = outcomes - CL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

According to interdependence theory, why would someone with low relationship satisfaction stay in a relationship

A

If someone has low satisfaction but still perceives their relationship as being better than alternative options

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Different relationship scenarios that arise from different combinations of meeting / not meeting approach and avoidance goals?

A

Flourishing – when you meet both approach and avoidance goals;
Boring – avoidance goals are met, but not approach goals;
Precarious – approach goals are met, but not avoidance goals;
Distressed – neither approach nor avoidance goals are met

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In the study by Lydon et al. participants with low, moderate, and high levels of commitment to their partners made a fake dating profile.

Participants were shown a very attractive dating profile and told that this person either (a) may or may not be interested in them (i.e., moderate threat) or (b) was definitely interested in them (high threat).

A

In the moderate threat condition:
-low committed people: don’t devaluate, they’re down no matter what
-moderately committed people: devaluate the profile DEFENSE MECHANISM
-highly committed people: don’t devaluate because not being disloyal bc not reciprocal thing,

In the high threat condition:
-low and moderately committed people: don’t devaluate bc they’re down that the person likes them
-highly committed people: devaluate bc don’t want to be disloyal DEFENSE MECHANISM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Interpersonal gap

A

Gap between how a sender encodes their message (encode = how people express their intentions) and how a receive decodes the message (decode = how receivers interpret sender’s message)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Illusion of transparency

A

Overestimate extent to which our internal states are accessible to others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Augmenting principle

A

Expect that target will take into account the inhibitory forces acting on our behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Signal amplification bias

A

Overestimate how much interest our (often very tentative) signals convey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

False consensus

A

Overestimate extent to which others share our attitudes & feelings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What could be responsible for the interpersonal gap

A
  • False consensus
  • Illusion of transparency
  • Augmenting principle
  • Pluralistic ignorance
  • Signal amplification bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

After an amazing first date, Joe waits for Jill’s text because he doesn’t want to look desperate, and when he sees Jill not texting back either he thinks she’s just playing it cool. Which bias is occuring here.

A

Pluralistic ignorance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Exchange relationships vs communal relationships

A

Exchange relationships: governed by explicit norms of even exchange
-keeping track of each other’s contributions
-more confortanble repaying others right away

Communal relationships: governed by genuine concern for welfare of the other
-avoid strict cost accounting
-do favours & make sacrifices without explicit repayment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What influences the commitment level of someone in a relationship

A

Satisfaction
Quality of Alternatives
Investment size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Relational turbulence model

A

period of turmoils & dips in satisfaction as partners adjust to new interdepende

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

3 components of stability

A

Affective: psychological attachment to relationships
Cognitive: taking along-term orientation
Conative: intention to persist in relationship

17
Q

fatal attraction

A

a quality that initially drew you to partner that now ennoys you

18
Q

construal level theory: higher level construal vs lower lovel construal

A

different mental representations of events based on th epsychological distance of the event

higher level: distant events are thought about in abstract terms

lower level: near events are thought about in concrete terms

19
Q

how do we call when we try to escalte physical or psychological intimacy to see how the other person responds + 2 examples

A

Trial intimacy moves
-escalating touch/proximity: move closer, see how the other person responds
-reciprocity: self-disclose, do they reciprocate the disclosure

20
Q

Diminishing self

A

making self-deprecating comments in the hope of reassurance
ex. you probably don’t find me very interesting.

21
Q

withdrawing

A

leaving and testing to see whether partner will sustain the interaction
ex. stop texting. will the other continue to write back

22
Q

hazing

A

testing to see whther target will provide some favour or service at cost to themselves
ex. saying let’s go see a movie but then changing your mind and see how person will respond