w6 Flashcards

1
Q

What is the difference between disclosure and inspection in legal proceedings?

A

Disclosure is the act of stating to another party that a document exists or has existed. Inspection, on the other hand, is the act of looking at a document that has been disclosed. When a party has a right to inspect a document, they also have a right to request a copy of that document.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What factors determine the type of disclosure order made by the court?

A

The court decides what type of disclosure order to make based on the track to which the claim has been allocated. In small claims track and fast track cases, there are standard orders, while in multi-track cases, the court considers the disclosure report and other information to determine the most appropriate form of disclosure order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the significance of a disclosure report in the determination of a disclosure order?

A

A disclosure report provides information about relevant documents, their location, storage, and estimated costs. It helps the court consider whether standard disclosure is too expensive and decide on the appropriate disclosure order. The report is filed and served by the parties before the first case management conference.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the different types of disclosure orders that a court can make?

A

A court can make various types of disclosure orders, including standard disclosure, alternative disclosure orders, specific disclosure, specific inspection, pre-action disclosure, and non-party disclosure. The specific type of order depends on the circumstances of the case and the track to which it has been allocated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the duty of disclosure imposed by a disclosure order?

A

The duty of disclosure imposed by a disclosure order continues until the proceedings are concluded. It requires a party to disclose the existence of relevant documents to the opponent. The opponent can then inspect the disclosed documents, unless there are valid reasons for refusing inspection, such as lack of control, disproportionality, or privilege.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the key aspects and benefits of disclosure and inspection in legal proceedings?

A

Disclosure and inspection help clarify the issues in dispute, allow parties to assess the strength of each other’s case, encourage settlement, and provide the court with all the necessary facts and evidence to determine the claim justly and proportionately.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the sources of disclosure obligations in legal proceedings?

A

There is no automatic obligation to give disclosure in legal proceedings. The obligation comes from a court order, which can be given on allocation or at a case management conference. The type of disclosure order depends on the track to which the claim has been allocated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the usual path to obtaining a disclosure order in different tracks of legal proceedings?

A

In the small claims track, the disclosure order is included in the directions given on allocation. In the fast track, the court usually gives directions for standard disclosure. In the multi-track, the parties complete a disclosure report and propose a disclosure order to the court at the case management conference.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When does a party have to disclose every copy of a document?

A

A party does not have to disclose every copy of a document unless the copies have changes, obliterations, or annotations that are material to the dispute. In such cases, all relevant copies need to be disclosed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the procedure for disclosure and inspection?

A

The procedure for disclosure and inspection depends on whether the court orders standard disclosure or another type of disclosure. If the court orders standard disclosure, the procedure is prescribed by the CPR (CPR 31.10). If an order other than standard disclosure has been made, the procedure will be set out as part of the order. Additionally, any duty of disclosure continues until proceedings are concluded (CPR 31.11).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

DR+Workshop+6
What are the obligations and limitations of disclosing documents in legal proceedings?

A

A party must disclose documents that come within its control or were created after the date it originally gave disclosure if they fall within its disclosure obligations. However, a party may withhold inspection of a document if it is no longer in their control, allowing inspection would be disproportionate, or if the document is privileged. A party can redact irrelevant or privileged parts of a document when allowing inspection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Under what circumstances can a document be used for collateral or ulterior purposes?

A

A document disclosed in legal proceedings can only be used for the purposes of those proceedings and not for any collateral or ulterior purpose, unless: 1) the document has been read to or referred to by the court at a public hearing, 2) the court gives permission, or 3) the party who disclosed the document and the person to whom the document belongs agree.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is standard disclosure and what documents does it require a party to disclose?

A

Standard disclosure is the most common form of disclosure order in legal proceedings. It requires a party to disclose documents that are in their control and that they rely on, or that are adverse to their case, adverse to another party’s case, support another party’s case, or are required to be disclosed by a relevant practice direction. ‘Documents’ has a broad definition and includes anything that records information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the concept of a reasonable search in the context of standard disclosure?

A

When an order for standard disclosure is made, a party must make a reasonable search for documents falling within the categories described in CPR 31.6(b) and (c). What constitutes a reasonable search depends on factors such as the number of documents involved, the nature and complexity of the proceedings, the difficulty and expense of retrieving documents, and the significance of any document likely to be found. The court must also consider the principle of proportionality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the purpose of a disclosure list in standard disclosure?

A

In standard disclosure, each party makes a list of the documents they are disclosing and serves it on the other party. The list has three parts: 1) documents in control, inspection permitted; 2) documents in control, inspection not permitted (due to privilege); 3) documents no longer in control. When listing the documents in the second part, it is not necessary to list individually each document for which inspection is withheld. Instead, a generic description can be used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the disclosure statement and what does it include?

A

Every list of documents must include a disclosure statement in the prescribed form. The disclosure statement sets out the extent of the search made, certifies the party’s understanding of its duty to disclose documents, and certifies that, to the best of the party’s knowledge, it has carried out that duty. The disclosure statement must also include details of any documents for which inspection is considered disproportionate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the consequences of failing to disclose or permit inspection of a document?

A

A party may not rely on any document that it fails to disclose or permit inspection of, unless the court gives permission. Proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against a person who makes a false disclosure statement without an honest belief in its truth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What types of privilege can allow a party to refuse inspection of a disclosed document?

A

A party can refuse to allow inspection of a disclosed document if it is privileged. There are various types of privilege, including legal advice privilege, litigation privilege, and without prejudice privilege. Legal advice privilege applies to confidential communications between a lawyer and a client for the purpose of giving or receiving legal advice. Litigation privilege applies to confidential communications made for the dominant purpose of obtaining legal advice, evidence, or information for use in litigation. Without prejudice privilege applies to documents created in a genuine attempt to settle a dispute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the significance of control in the context of disclosure obligations?

A

A party’s duty to disclose documents is limited to documents that are or have been within their control. Control is defined widely and includes physical possession of the document, a right to possession of the document, or a right to inspect or take copies of the document. The duty of disclosure encompasses documents presently and formerly within a party’s control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the definition of a document in the context of disclosure obligations?

A

A document is defined very widely and includes anything that records information. It can include digital recordings, emails, photographs, text messages, voicemails, metadata, and more. Electronic documents can be stored on various devices and locations. In many cases, the majority of documents are electronic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the requirement for a reasonable search in standard disclosure?

A

In standard disclosure, a party must carry out a ‘reasonable search’ for documents falling within the categories described in CPR 31.6(b) and (c). What constitutes a reasonable search depends on factors such as the number of documents involved, the nature and complexity of the proceedings, the difficulty and expense of retrieving any document, and the significance of any document likely to be found. The court must also consider the overriding objective and the principle of proportionality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the purpose of inspection in the context of legal proceedings?

A

Inspection in legal proceedings is concerned with examining documents that have been disclosed. It follows disclosure and allows a party to review the documents relevant to the case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Under what circumstances can inspection of a document be refused?

A

Inspection of a document can be refused if the document is no longer in the disclosing party’s control, allowing inspection would be disproportionate, or the document is privileged. Privileged documents are not required to be listed individually but are described generically in a party’s list of documents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

When can redaction of a document be permitted?

A

Redaction, which means blanking out parts of a document, can be permitted in certain circumstances. One circumstance is when there is a clear and distinct part of a document that is privileged, but the remainder is not. Another circumstance is when the information is totally irrelevant to the dispute.

25
Q

What is the concept of waiver of privilege?

A

Waiver of privilege occurs when a party deliberately allows inspection of a privileged document because they believe it helps their case. However, the party does not have an unrestricted right to determine what privilege they wish to waive. Waiver of privilege in part of a wholly-privileged document can lead to waiver of privilege over the remainder of the document, unless it deals with entirely different subject matter.

26
Q

What happens if there is a dispute over whether a document is subject to privilege?

A

In a dispute over whether a document is subject to privilege, the burden of proof is on the party claiming privilege to establish it. Documents referred to in statements of case, witness statements, affidavits, and expert’s reports can also be inspected, subject to privilege and the court’s discretion.

27
Q

What is the procedure for inspection of documents?

A

A party wishing to inspect documents must send a written notice to the other side, who must allow inspection within seven days. Copies of the documents can also be requested, with an undertaking to pay reasonable photocopying charges. Failure to permit inspection of a document may result in the party not being able to rely on that document, unless the court gives permission.

28
Q

What is the difference between confidentiality and privilege?

A

Confidentiality and privilege are not the same thing. Many documents may be confidential but still not privileged. Privilege refers to a document that is subject to a right or duty to withhold inspection, while confidentiality refers to the nature of the information being kept confidential.

29
Q

What is the significance of redaction in the context of document inspection?

A

Redaction allows for the removal of privileged or irrelevant information from a document before inspection. It helps protect privilege and ensures that only relevant information is disclosed.

30
Q

When can a party waive privilege over a document?

A

A party can deliberately allow inspection of a privileged document if they believe it helps their case. However, waiver of privilege in part of a wholly-privileged document will lead to waiver of privilege over the remainder of the document, unless it deals with entirely different subject matter. Waiver of privilege in one document can also result in privilege being lost in other documents if it would be unfair to allow the party waiving privilege not to put those documents before the court or opponent.

31
Q

What is the principle of ‘Once privileged, always privileged’?

A

The principle of ‘Once privileged, always privileged’ means that if something is privileged in relation to one set of proceedings, it will remain privileged in relation to all proceedings, unless privilege is waived. Privilege can only be lost if something takes place to cause the privilege to be lost, such as waiver.

32
Q

What is legal advice privilege and when does it apply?

A

Legal advice privilege is a type of privilege that protects wider communications between a solicitor and client when the solicitor is retained primarily to provide legal advice. It applies when the communication falls within the ‘continuum of communication’ and relates to what should prudently and sensibly be done in the legal context of the case.

33
Q

Under what circumstances does legal advice privilege extend to repeated internal communication of legal advice?

A

If a client repeats internally legal advice provided by their lawyer, for example to other personnel within their company, then that repetition also has the benefit of privilege. However, it is important to distinguish between a repetition of the lawyer’s legal advice (which is covered by privilege) and the client’s own opinion (which is not covered by privilege).

34
Q

Can communications with in-house lawyers enjoy legal advice privilege?

A

Yes, communications with in-house lawyers can enjoy legal advice privilege before the English courts in civil actions, as long as the communication concerns advice given in a legal capacity rather than a general commercial or executive capacity with no legal context. However, privilege is unlikely to attach to communications with individuals who are qualified lawyers but who are not employed in a legal role, even if they are giving legal advice.

35
Q

What is litigation privilege and what does it protect?

A

Litigation privilege is another type of privilege that protects communications between a lawyer and client, as well as documents brought into existence for the purpose of prosecuting or defending a claim. It covers communication between a lawyer and client, communication between a lawyer and a third party, and communication between a client and a third party. The dominant purpose of these communications must be to obtain evidence or advice for litigation that is reasonably in prospect.

36
Q

What is the significance of the dominant purpose in establishing litigation privilege?

A

The dominant purpose test is used to determine whether a document is covered by litigation privilege. If there is more than one purpose behind the preparation of a document, the court will look at the dominant purpose. The test is one of dominance, not exclusivity. Establishing the dominant purpose of a document may be difficult when documents have been produced for a dual purpose.

37
Q

DR+Workshop+6
What is the requirement for litigation to be ‘reasonably in prospect’ for litigation privilege to apply?

A

For litigation privilege to apply, the litigation for which the documents are to be used must be ‘reasonably in prospect’. This means that litigation must be a real likelihood rather than a mere possibility. A general apprehension of future litigation is insufficient.

38
Q

What is the significance of marking a document as ‘without prejudice’?

A

A document marked ‘without prejudice’ indicates that it is part of a genuine attempt to settle a dispute. The privilege applies to the substance of the document, not just its form. Without prejudice documents are generally not seen by the court unless the privilege is expressly waived. However, some documents may be marked as ‘without prejudice save as to costs’, which means the court can consider the document when deciding costs-related matters.

39
Q

Can a solicitor’s attendance note of a conversation between parties be privileged?

A

No, a solicitor’s attendance note of a conversation between parties, or what happens at court, is not privileged. There is no confidentiality in notes of matters at which both sides are present. Therefore, such notes would generally need to be disclosed during the disclosure and inspection stage of proceedings.

40
Q

Can a document marked ‘without prejudice save as to costs’ be shown to the court?

A

Yes, a document marked ‘without prejudice save as to costs’ can be shown to the court when it is considering costs-related matters. The court will generally not see the document’s contents unless it is specifically considering the costs of the action or a particular issue related to costs.

41
Q

What is the requirement for litigation privilege to apply to a document?

A

For litigation privilege to apply to a document, the document must have been created for the dominant purpose of obtaining evidence or advice for litigation that is reasonably in prospect. The dominant purpose test looks at the primary purpose behind the creation of the document, and it is not necessary for litigation to be the exclusive purpose

42
Q

Can a sheet of paper containing notes of conversations between a solicitor and client be privileged from inspection?

A

The part of the sheet of paper concerning the conversation between solicitor and client is the only part that would be privileged from inspection. The record of the conversation between solicitor and client would be subject to litigation privilege and/or legal advice privilege. However, the rest of the sheet of paper, dealing with the conduct of the case, would not be privileged.

43
Q

What are the four provisions commonly encountered in obtaining information from opponents or non-parties?

A

he four provisions commonly encountered are: 1) Application for specific disclosure and/or specific inspection (CPR 31.12), 2) Application for pre-action disclosure (CPR 31.16), 3) Application for disclosure from someone not a party to proceedings (CPR 31.17), and 4) Norwich Pharmacal Orders (CPR 31.18).

44
Q

What is specific disclosure and when can an application for it be made?

A

Specific disclosure is an order that a party must disclose documents specified in the order, carry out a search as stated in the order, or disclose any documents found as a result of the search. An application for specific disclosure can be made at any time after proceedings have been issued, usually after standard disclosure has occurred.

45
Q

What are the common uses of an application for specific disclosure?

A

Common uses of an application for specific disclosure include when the opponent has not complied with existing disclosure obligations, when the applicant wants documents earlier than the current directions provide for (but after proceedings have been issued), or when the applicant wants something more than the current directions provide for.

46
Q

What is specific inspection and when is it used?

A

Specific inspection is an order that allows a party to inspect a document that has been disclosed but is claimed to be disproportionate to allow inspection. It is used relatively rarely in practice as it is uncommon for a party to disclose a document but claim that inspection would be disproportionate.

47
Q

What is pre-action disclosure and when can the court grant an application for it?

A

Pre-action disclosure is the court’s power to order disclosure of documents before proceedings have commenced. The court may grant an application for pre-action disclosure if the respondent is likely to be a party to subsequent proceedings, the applicant is also likely to be a party to those proceedings, the respondent’s duty by way of standard disclosure would extend to the documents sought, and pre-action disclosure is desirable to dispose fairly of the anticipated proceedings, assist in resolving the dispute without proceedings, or save costs.

48
Q

What are the requirements for an application for pre-action disclosure?

A

An application for pre-action disclosure must specify the order sought, including listing the documents sought, and be supported by evidence. The evidence is typically in the form of a witness statement made by the party or their solicitor.

49
Q

What is non-party disclosure and when can the court order it?

A

Non-party disclosure is the court’s power to order a person who is not a party to the proceedings to give disclosure of documents. The court can order non-party disclosure if the documents are likely to support the applicant’s case or adversely affect the case of one of the other parties, and disclosure is necessary to dispose fairly of the claim or to save costs.

50
Q

What is a Norwich Pharmacal Order and when is it used?

A

A Norwich Pharmacal Order is an order that requires a respondent, who is not the defendant, to disclose information that allows the claimant to sue the right defendant, usually the identity of the defendant. It is used when a wrong has been carried out by an ultimate wrongdoer, the order is needed to bring a claim against the wrongdoer, and the respondent is more than a ‘mere witness’ to the wrongdoing and likely to provide the necessary information.

51
Q

What are the requirements for an application for non-party disclosure?

A

An application for non-party disclosure must specify the order sought, including listing the documents sought, and be supported by evidence. The evidence should also require the respondent to specify documents no longer under their control or which they have a right to withhold from inspection.

52
Q

What is the general rule regarding costs in pre-action disclosure applications?

A

The general rule is that the party against whom an order for pre-action disclosure is sought will be awarded the costs of the application and complying with it. However, the court may make a different costs order if the respondent did not comply with a pre-action protocol or a relatively modest request for pre-action disclosure.

53
Q

What is the presumption regarding costs in non-party disclosure applications?

A

The presumption is that the court will order the applicant to pay the costs of the respondent in dealing with the application and complying with any order made as a consequence. However, the court may make a different costs order if the respondent acted unreasonably in opposing the application or previous request for disclosure.

54
Q

What is the purpose of a Norwich Pharmacal order?

A

A Norwich Pharmacal order provides a solution when court proceedings cannot be commenced because the identity of the defendant is unknown. It orders a respondent, who is not the defendant, to disclose information that allows the claimant to sue the right defendant.

55
Q

What conditions must be satisfied for the court to grant a Norwich Pharmacal order?

A

For the court to exercise the power to order Norwich Pharmacal relief, three conditions must be satisfied: (1) a wrong must have been carried out by an ultimate wrongdoer, (2) there must be a need for an order to enable action to be brought against the ultimate wrongdoer, and (3) the person against whom the order is sought must have some involvement and be able to provide the necessary information.

56
Q

What are the requirements for a Norwich Pharmacal order to be granted?

A

A Norwich Pharmacal order must be necessary and proportionate in all the circumstances of the case. The court will consider the specific details of the case to determine if the order should be granted. Additionally, the costs of giving the disclosure are usually paid by the successful applicant.

57
Q

Under what circumstances can a party refuse inspection of a document?

A

A party can refuse inspection of a document if they no longer have it in their control, if allowing inspection would be disproportionate, or if the document is privileged. Privilege can apply to documents that are confidential communications between a lawyer and a client, communications connected to litigation, or documents created for the purpose of settling a dispute.

58
Q

What is the default position regarding inspection of disclosed documents?

A

The default position is that the parties to whom a document has been disclosed are entitled to inspect it. The receiving party can either visit the other party or their solicitors to look at the documents or request copies of specific documents.

59
Q
A