Lecture 5 - Personality (Consequential Outcomes) Flashcards

1
Q

Direct effects

A

predicting from the general to the particular. E.g. does
conscientiousness predict specific expressions of conscientious behaviour?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Indirect effects

A

‘mediation’ – where some intervening variable or process forms a
link in the chain between personality & outcome. E.g. via situation selection (for
instance, because John is higher in openness, he is more likely to put himself in a
certain situation or pursue certain goals that lead to a particular outcome)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Interactive / conditional effects

A

refers to person x environment interactions. E.g. via
differential reactivity to events/situations. For instance, someone low in neuroticism
may respond more strongly/in a more adaptive way to a certain event associated
with a certain life outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When are personality characteristics considered important?

A

if they enable us to make
predictions about what other individuals are going to do.
§ For example, who might help us, who might hurt us, who will offer
leadership, who is reliable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Strongest individual differences predictors in job performance?

A

The strongest individual differences predictor was found to be cognitive ability (or
‘intelligence’), r = 0.51. But, personality adds to the predictive validity of cognitive
ability (e.g. combining cognitive ability with an integrity test leads to the highest
predictive association, r = 0.65).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conscientiousness predicts performance across. . .

A

ALL occupations

extraversion predicted performance in 2 specific job areas (management + sales)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Agreeableness, openness/intellect & low neuroticism predicts performance in

A

customer service roles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Conscientiousness predicts job performance moderately in the region of

A

r = 0.2
(moderate predictive effect).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Duncan socioeconomic index – typical top scorers include

A

doctors, dentists,
lawyers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A combination of ____ and _____ predicts achievement
across programs (Kuncel et al., 2001).

A

cognitive ability
conscientiousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Extraversion only predicts performance in salespeople when performance is linked
with _____

A

rewards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

conscientiousness predicts longevity/probability of death

A

– those low in
conscientiousness die earlier.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Found that for the odds of returning for a 2nd health check within 7 years:

A
  • Conscientiousness was a positive predictor.
  • Extraversion & openness were negative predictors.
  • Neuroticism was a curvilinear predictor – at lower levels of neuroticism there was a lower chance of participants returning for a 2nd check-up, at moderate
    levels of neuroticism that likelihood increased, and at high levels of
    neuroticism the likelihood decreased again.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Type A personality (y (competitive, ambitious, restless, impatient & hostile)
. . .

A

increases one’s risk of heart disease

Hostility appears
to be the ‘active ingredient’ in this – captured by low agreeableness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Agreeableness may protect against. . .

A

biological risk factors for cardiovascular disease
(e.g. reduced sympathetic nervous system response to stress & frustration).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which personality type does NOT seem to have any link with longevity?

A

openness / intellect

17
Q

Actor effects

A

does my personality influence the relationship outcomes I
experience?

18
Q

Partner effects

A

does my partner’s personality influence the relationship outcomes I experience?

® Agreeableness & conscientiousness are linked to a lower likelihood of infidelity
(Schmitt, 2004). This is an actor effect.
® Agreeableness & conscientiousness are also linked to higher marital satisfaction
(Dyrenforth et al., 2010). They found both actor & partner effects for this (your
agreeableness & conscientiousness predicts your level of martial satisfaction, but
also your partner’s level of marital satisfaction)

19
Q

Divorce is explained in terms of. . .

A

indirect effects (mediation) via relationship dynaics

20
Q

Enduring dynamics vs emergent distress pathway

A

Solomon & Jackson (2014) examined two potential pathways by which relationship
dissolution may occur – enduring dynamics (average relationship satisfaction) and
emergent distress (changes in relationship satisfaction). The enduring dynamics
pathway would suggest that the couple’s personality traits predicted disharmony at
the beginning of the relationship, and this effect was sustained over time leading to
a discontinuation of the relationship. The emergent distress pathway suggests that
personality traits predict the likelihood that dynamics will deteriorate at some stage
in the relationship

21
Q

What does the reciprocal effects model suggest?

A

Claims that your social situation is made up of influences from both your own personality & the personalities of the other people you are engaged with.

22
Q

Measures to assess political orientation

A

self-placement measures

right wing authoritarianism (traditionalism) - they want social
norms & traditions preserved, social institutions respected & social order
maintained.

23
Q

What is social dominance orientation

A

endorsement of hierarchies and social/group
inequality (aka economic conservatism)