Logical Fallacies Flashcards

1
Q

Hasty generalization

A

Making a quick generalization about something

ex: I heard that there was drug use in a bathroom at that high school, so that high school must have a terrible drug problem.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Post hoc ergo procter hoc

A

after this, therefore because of this

Events that happen in sequence does not imply causation

ex: The rooster crows always before the sun rises, therefore the crowing rooster causes the sun to rise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

False dilemma

A

The reduction or oversimplification of an argument to two extreme, inaccurate choices.

ex: I either pass this class, or I will never get into college.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Faulty Analogy

A

Assuming that because two things are alike in one way, they will be alike in another way

ex: apples, strawberries, and raspberries are all red and all fruits, so all fruits are red

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Straw man fallacy

A

the oversimplification or exaggeration of another’s opinion/perspective followed by an attack on this distorted version when in reality the argument is more complicated or nuanced

ex: A:“I love eating burgers and steak!” B: “Oh my god, you’re such an animal hater! You’re terrible! I bet you don’t believe in having pets.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ad hominem

A

to the person

when the argument is focusing on the other person’s character rather than the actual topic itself

ex: Abby explained an APUSH topic to Ambika, and Ambika said she’s wrong because she got a C in the last precalc test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Red herring

A

A piece of knowledge or information that has the intention to misguide, deceive, or distract an audience from the current and or relevant topic of conversation

ex:
Employee: “This company needs to raise our salaries!”
Employer: “We can’t raise salaries but we’ll provide great benefits”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Equivocation

A

Presents only part of the truth; leaves out facts that a reader would need to make a thorough evaluation of the conclusion; relies on ambiguous definitions of words or to mean two or more things

ex: I have the right to freedom of speech. Therefore, it’s right that I say whatever I want without impunity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Circular reasoning

A

Both the conclusion and evidence describe the same idea.

ex:
1. He does that because he has autism
2. How do you know he does that because of his autism?
3. Because he does that
4. But why does he do that?
5. Because he has autism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Appeal to false authority

A

The conclusion relies solely on the credentials or fame of the person making the argument.

ex: I’m going to drink only lemon infused water because Kylie Jenner said to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Non sequitur

A

It doesn’t follow

the conclusion is not logically related to the evidence that preceded it

ex: People died from cancer before smoking was invented, so smoking doesn’t cause cancer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bandwagon

A

Appeal to the masses; appeal to the “common” belief.

ex: Everyone is going to get the new iphone, so I will too

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly