Torts I Intentional Torts Defenses Flashcards

1
Q

Consent

A

Consent may be express (communicated in words) or implied (by conduct).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Self-defense

A

When under the threat of an imminent, unprivileged attack, or under reasonable apprehension of such an attack. The person may use reasonable force to prevent the threatened harm. This belief of imminent attack must be reasonable under the circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Self-defense Reasonable Force in Response

A

May only the degree of force that is reasonably necessary to avoid the threatened harm. May only use deadly force when threatened with death or serious bodily injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Self-defense Retreat

A

Majority rule: No duty to retreat before using force.

Minority rule: Must retreat if possible before using deadly force in self-defense; no retreat required in one’s home.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Self-Defense Third-party Inadvertent Injury

A

One acting in self-defense is not liable under intentional torts for injuries inflicted inadvertently, but may be liable for neglience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Defense of Others

A

One may defend another from attack in the same manner and conditions that they would be entitled to self-defense.

Common law liability: No mistakes are allowed, if defendant mistakenly uses force when a third person is not entitled to self defense.

Majority rule: As long as it reasonably appeared to the defendant that the actions were necessary to prevent harm to another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Defense of Property

A

One may use reasonable force to prevent torts against their real and personal property. However, deadly force may never be utilized.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Reasonable Force Defense of Property

A

Defendant must first demand plaintiff to stop prior to using force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Use of Force Dispossessed Land

A

Majority rule: Does not allow use of force to recover land that has been wrongfully dispossessed. Modern civil statutes allow prompt judicial remedies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Use of Force Dispossessed Property

A

After demanding it’s return, may use reasonable force to recover property, provided owner is in hot pursuit. Once possession is clearly lost, must resort to legal recovery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Trespass to Recovery Property

A

May include privilege to enter onto another’s land to recover property. May enter upon land for a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Authority

A

Police officers have authority to make arrests.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Felony arrest authority

A

Police officers can arrest without warrants after felony, if reasonable cause to believe that suspect to be arrested committed the felony.

Private citizens may arrest without warrants when a felony was committed. If mistaken, liable for false imprisonment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Breach of the Peace authority

A

Both police officers and private citizens may arrest for breach of the peace (usually a misdemeanor involving violence), or reasonably appears about to be committed in their presence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Misdemeanor arrest authority

A

Majority rule: Both police officers and private citizens may not arrest without warrants for misdemeanors.

Minority rule: Police officers can arrest without warrants for misdemeanors when committed in the officer’s presence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Shopkeeper’s Privilege

A

Majority rule: Where a shopkeeper has a objectively reasonable suspicion that an individual has stolen goods, allow use of reasonable force to detain the person, for a reasonable period, and in a reasonable manner on the premises or immediate vicinity.

17
Q

Private Necessity

A

If an objectively reasonable person in the same circumstance would believe it necessary to protect himself or his property.

The threatened harm must be serious and imminent.

Relieved of lability for trespass to land or chattel, conversion - but must compensate for any damages.

18
Q

Public Necessity

A

Where the public good is involved, the threatened harm severe enough to amount to a disaster and the action is necessary to avoid harm to the public. Granted immunity from liability, and no compensation for damages.