Causation Flashcards

1
Q

Factual Causation

A

That ‘but for’ the conduct of the accused the victim would not have died or been injured
R v White

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v White

A

D out potassium cyanide into drink - intention to kill mother, died of heart attack not poison, D acquitted of murder, convicted of attempted murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Legal Causation 3 points

A
  • Original injury was an operative cause of death
  • The intervening act was reasonably foreseeable
  • “Thin skull” Test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The original injury was an operative cause of death: case

A

R v Smith - D stabbed P twice with bayonet - carried to Medical Officer, dropped twice on route, pierced lung, D’s conviction upheld.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did court say about R v Smith

A

The original injury is still an operant and substantial cause of death
> Medical treatment must have killed independently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Cheshire

A

D shot victim in leg, he died from rare complications caused by tracheostomy - D convicted of murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The intervening act was reasonably foreseeable

A

Intervening act which is reasonably foreseeable will not break chain of causation
R v Pagett
R v Corbett
R v Muhammed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Pagett

A

D used girlfriend as human shield, he fired at armed police, girlfriend killed by shots from police - D liable
- Reasonably foreseeable police would shoot back

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Corbett

A

Mentally handicapped men drinking all day, started hitting + head butting - victim fell into gutter, struck by car - liable manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Muhammed

A
  • D racing car over 100MPH, tyre blew out, lost control- killing 3 y/o son + injure wife and daughter - no break in chain of causation - reasonably foreseeable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The “thin skull” test

A

Defendant must take his victim as he finds him
eg: victim has unusually thin skull and makes blow fatal - defendant liable
R v Blaue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Blaue

A

Stabbing - Refusal to accept blood transfusions, victim died of her wounds - take victim as he found her

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly