L15 - Helping Pt 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Define Altruism?

A
  • Helping that benefits others but requires self-sacrifice on the part of the helper
  • No regard for personal consequences/potential harm
  • No expectation of reward
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is pro-social behaviour?

A
  • Helping that benefits others, regardless of motives - broader category
  • Many prosocial acts are not altruistic BUT can be to impress others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 5 perspectives on helping?

A
  • Decision-making
  • Learning
  • Social Norms
  • Evolutionary
  • Social Exchange Theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the decision making perspective?

A

A number of decisions need to be made that influence helping behaviour in a potential emergency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the overall stages in deciding to help:

A

1) Perceiving a Need
A - Notice the situation
B - Is it an emergency
2) Taking responsibility
3) Weigh costs/benefits
4) How should I help?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was a study for Noticing the Situation

A
  • In a room, man in hall falls of ladder, for some ppts = he cries out
  • More & faster helping when ppts hear victim cry
  • Cue gives clear indication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was a study for Is It An Emergency?

A
  • Students study in lab alone, apparent emergency = smoke
  • Many ppts took no action as didn’t perceive event as emergency
  • e.g leaky air con, chem lab, steam pipes, truth gas etc.
  • Some assumed it was an exp and socially endured discomfort of room
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was a study for Taking Responsibility?

A
  • While at beach, person near you goes for swim, asks to watch their belongings (or not) which are then stolen
  • Ppts are 3x more likely to help when made a commitment to stranger
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was a study for Weighing Costs and Benefits?

A
  • Male ppts witnesses staged quarrel between couple
  • Condition 1: female says “go away, I’ve never seen you before” OR condition 2: “…Wish I had never married you”
  • 3X as much intervention in condition 1 as perceived greater costs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was a study for How Can I Help?

A
  • More likely to help when you feel competent
  • Another ladder accident
  • Nurses helped more than control ppts after hearing person fall from ladder
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the learning perspective?

A
  • Learn to help through reinforcement, modelling and observational learning
  • Evidence that modelling and reinforcement have positive impacts for adults and children
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was a study for Reinforcement?

A
  • Children asked to share toys
  • When children were rewarded with dispositional praise = pronounced long term effect on prosocial behaviour compared to general praise e.g you’re nice vs that was nice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was a study for Modelling?

A
  • Driving and see a driver helping someone, 1 mile later, you pass someone with a flat tire
  • More likely to help if you’ve observed another’s helping behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was a study for Observation?

A
  • Elevation: uplifting positive feelings experienced after observing another person perform a virtuous act
  • Ppts see clip of either musicians thanking their music teachers, fawlty towers clip OR documentary about ocean life
  • DV = will ppts help in completing another experiment? (amount of time given up to do another exp)
  • RESULTS: The elevation condition would spend more time (2x) to help exp. Then humour and then control (measuring positive affect)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the social norms perspective?

A
  • Internalise social rules about helping
  • Help because society dictates that we help
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the three key norms?

A
  • Social responsibility - help those dependent on us
  • Reciprocity - help those who help us
  • Social justice - norms about fairness and equity
17
Q

What is the evolutionary perspective?

A
  • Is helping in the genes?
  • More likely to help those genetically most close to ourselves e.g healthy offspring
  • Help strangers = norm of reciprocity?
18
Q

What is the exchange perspective?

A
  • Help is rewarding because we might need help in the future
  • It relieves distress of seeing someone suffer
  • We get positive feedback
  • Can alleviate physical pain
19
Q

What are the benefits of helping?

A

1) Volitional prosocial actions results in increased well-being for both the help giver and recipient, through the satisfaction of basic needs related to autonomy
2) After performing altruistic actions, Ppts brain activity in response to a painful shock was significantly reduced

20
Q

What is the Empathy-altruism model?

A
  • Helping reflects self-serving and selfless goals
  • Three key motives: empathetic concern, social reward and personal distress
  • Empathetic concern - imagining feelings of another person, having positive regard towards someone else
21
Q

What did Toi and Batson do? (Car accident)

A
  • Ppts learn about student in bad car accident where they may need to drop out of university
  • Manipulated empathy and costs of not helping e.g imagine how she feels, and will we see her in class
  • When empathy was high, regardless of costs of no help, ppts gave more help
  • When empathy = low, AND cost of no help = high = more help from ppts
  • When empathy low & cost of no help low = less help
22
Q

What was a study on everyday empathy?

A
  • 246 ppts were prompted on phone 7x a day on 7 consecutive days
  • At each point, measured current happiness, well-being, had empathy opportunity, received/offer empathy OR performed kind act in last 15 mins
  • RESULTS: opportunities to express empathy very common: ppts who noticed more empathy opps and emphasised more, reported greater happiness and well-being. If people were less confident to emphasised = well-being was lower
  • Women emphasised more than men, politically liberal ppts were more empathetic towards strangers than tories