Panic Disorder Flashcards

• How predicted states help the brain generates physiological experience • How do symptoms of panic disorder and panic attacks relate to interoceptive experience and insular cortex • Potential causes of prediction error (beliefs/somatic error hypothesis)

1
Q

what is the spinothalamic pathway?

A

spinal cord -> thalamus -> hypothalamus -> insular cortex (terminates) -> goes to amygdala too

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

where is the insular cortex and what does it do?

A

located deep within the brain and integrates information across modalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is interoceptive awareness?

A

metacognition about interoception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the interoceptive sensibility?

A

subjective interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is interoceptive accuracy?

A

accuracy at detecting interoceptive signals relative to objective measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is a neural indicator of interoception?

A

Heart-beat evoked potential -> neural signal approx 300 milliseconds after the R-wave heartbeat [we think this is the cortical index of that heartbeat of interoception]
* time-locked to R wave (point in cardiac cycle synchronising stimuli to the heart/phase of the cardiac cycle)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is an Inaugural moment?

A

Initial Sensory Map (without any prior experience)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does a predictive model suggest experience of body state is created?

A

Actively via prior experience and regulatory actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Is the insula cortex in both hemispheres?

A

Yes (there’s a left and right insular cortex)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What can large uncorrected prediction errors lead to?

A

Maladaptive cognition AND maladaptive behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What isn’t a symptom of panic disorder?

A

Dyskinea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which is thought to be true of PD patients according to the study by Pauli et al., (1991)?

A

They catastrophise normal cardiac events [-> which leads to a change in their physiological state]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is mental health?

A
  • allows accurate experience of the body and the self
  • trust the body to provide consistent, reliable sensory information
  • enable engagement in everyday activities
  • impairments of this characteristic of many different mental health conditions
  • more contemporary approaches to mental health i.e.
  • Transdiagnostic approach to mental health -> identifying mechanisms that might be important across many mental health conditions
  • Interoception implicated in many conditions
  • Transdiagnostic mechanism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Interoceptive symptoms are thought to be prominent features of many psychiatric disorders i.e. anxiety, depression and eating disorders. However, it’s unclear what the interoceptive deficit is but what are two reasons it potentially could be?

A

unclear whether it’s a different processing on interceptive signals or bias in reporting interoceptive signals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Elliot and Pfeifer (2022) measured interoceptive sensibility (MAIA) and anxiety during COVID-19 via survey responses. What did they find?

A

interoceptive constructs correlate with anxiety
- worry, trust, attention regulation
- cardiac cycle and brain activity are also related to anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

interoceptive accuracy [Adams et al. (2022)] looked at anxiety related to the cardiac domain as individuals tend to say they feel most anxiety within their heart. A meta-analysis of 55 studies during different measures interoceptive accuracy and anxiety (clinical and subthreshold samples). What did they find?

A

no relation between IA and anxiety and no effect of task or sample
- assumption that difficulty to detect heartbeats might make those more anxious or hypervillence of anxiety means we feel our heartbeat more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Yoris et al. (2015) invested Interoceptive Awareness in 21 anxiety patients with panic attacks and 13 Health Controls.
- measured Heartbeat monitoring task and Metacognitions about interoception (via a questionnaire)

Method:
- Followed an audio-recording of a synchronic (1) heartbeat or non synchronic (2) heartbeat
- Monitored heartbeats without external feedback with two intervals
- Then repeated this while receiving simultaneous auditory feedback of their own heartbeat

Way did they find?

A
  • no diff in interoceptive accuracy task
  • difference in metacognition (threatening beliefs about the body) -> interpreted signals differently compared to those in the control
  • detection of symptoms but how they are interpreted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Pang et al. (2019)
* Heartbeat evoked potential (HEP) – Neural indicator of interoception (EEG)
* Time-locked to the R-wave ~300ms latency
* Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and health controls (HC) were two groups
* Examined HEP during resting state in 2 conditions:
- Eyes open (exteroception - more visual environment)
- Eyes closed (interoception - attending more internally)

What did they find?

A

In HC, HEP greater when eyes closed (attending more to interoception) compared to eyes open rest -> stronger neural responses to these heartbeats (greater focus in interoception with eyes closed)

In GAD, there’s no significant difference between conditions (reflects higher monitoring of interoception at all times, so they don’t get a facilitation effect of HEP when their eyes are closed, because they are already attending to it to it all the time at a higher extent)
- cortical response to heartbeats is greater in GAD
- reflects higher monitoring of interoception at all times at a higher extent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How is the Insular Cortex potentially different in anxiety disorders?

A

insula is found to have abnormalities in structure and function across many different forms of anxiety disorders
- abnormality in perception or interpretation of internal bodily signals (is less clear)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Etkin et al. (2007) conducted a Meta-analysis of brain activation for emotional processing across different anxiety disorders. Studies involved looked at…
* Social Phobia – exaggerated fear of negative scrutiny in social interactions
* Specific Phobia – irrational fear of something that poses little or no actual danger
* PTSD – anxiety and flashbacks triggered by a traumatic event
Combined data from multiple studies, including health controls with a normal fear response

What was found?

A
  • patients with all three disorders demonstrated hypotheractivity (patients > comparison subjects) in the amygdala and insula
  • this pattern of activation was also noted for healthy subjects experiencing anticipatory anxiety during fear conditions (looks like a normal response but patients were experiencing this at all times)
  • an exaggerated fear response with shared neurobiology—might be reflected in shared neurobiology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

interoception and self-concept

A
  • an important aspect of self is corporeal awareness
  • perception, knowledge and evaluation of one’s own body as well as of other bodies (Berlucchi and Aglitoi, 2009)
  • being aware of our internal state modulates our approach and distancing behaviours which, in turn, help us maintain and regain homeostasis but also to navigate social environment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what does being aware of our internal state allow us to do?

A

modulates our approach and distancing behaviours which, in turn, help us maintain and regain homeostasis but also to navigate social environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Interception and Psychiatric Disorders

A
  • recent interoception models suggest that interoceptive experience is not passively derived from visceral sensations
  • interoceptive states are dynamically constructed in the brain using information from sensory predictions and regulatory actions (afferent and efferents) -> actively generated rather than passively received)
  • experiences are dynamically constructed in the brain, using information from afferent inputs, sensory predictors and regulatory outputs (actively generated rather than just passively received)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

how does the insular cortex receive information?

A
  • receives information about blood pressure and oxygenation, timing and strength of the heart rate etc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

what are predictors?

A
  • classical theories suggest that cortical regions either reflect stimulus intensity or additive effects of intensity and expectations
  • if we base all our behaviours and thoughts on our sensory input, can we predict? predictors we use in everyday life and help us with coherent experiences and help us successfully navigate
  • predictive theories suggest perception is shaped by the integration of beliefs about the world with mismatches resulting from the comparison of these beliefs against sensory input
  • have certain expectations based on our previous experiences -> integrate and help create predictions thus shaping our experience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

how does the insula cortex send information?

A

top down regulations control of autonomic functions such as regulating the heartbeat and blood pressure (does right thing to be able to construct interception)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

what is predictive coding theory?

A

as lots of things in the world are stable (predictable) instead of processing all information, we just compare experience to predictions
* predicts are faster than direct sensory information
* updating predictions through errors help learning -> helping us to navigate our environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

predictive coding theory in terms of interoception:

A
  • predictive doing links physiological states to behaviours and emotions
  • prediction errors with interoception can lead to maladaptive emotions and behaviours - i.e. your heart beating every time you come to a specific place because you anticipate feeling nervous -> integrating social environment and prediction of the physiological state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

experience of body state in terms of predictions:

A
  • inaugural moment: initial sensory map from the body without prior experience
  • map then modified by life experience - predicted sensory experience of encountering stimuli (internal or external)
  • insular cortex, amygdala, anterior cingulate, ventral medial prefrontal cortex is incorporated, bringing this together to create coherent experiences for a physiological state
  • experience of body state influenced by cognition (beliefs)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

the predicted body state is continually updated from afferent information and cognition, how does it do this?

A
  • this process results in prediction errors
  • small errors are ignored
  • large errors are detected and regulated to maintain homeostasis
  • adapt predictions (next time, anticipate not being nervous) OR adopt physiological state (i.e. dealing with error and sending signals -> sending signals to insula to increase heart rate which will increase anxiety/induce it to the correct error)
  • want to get back to homeostasis and rest within the body
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

the insular cortex is anatomically situated for detecting, what?

A

errors

31
Q

The Insular Cortex is a neural hub for, what?

A

combining information from visceral organs with cognition, emotion and exteroceptive sensory sign

32
Q

what do anatomical connections allow?

A

integration physiological state and cognition

33
Q

anatomical connections are linked to two key components of anxiety, what are they?

A

sympathetic hyperarousal (hypervelliance -> attending too much) and worry/illumination

34
Q

associations between physiological state, emotions and cognition require a brain region capable of what?

A

imitating and maintaining complex representations -> exactly what the insula does

35
Q

altered prediction signals provide what?

A

a process by which conditioning can occur -> pivotal in the development of pathological anxiety (but also different i.e. cravings and addictions)

36
Q

[Geuter et al. (2017)]
* Heat pain paradigm with health participants - giving a stimulus that was either cold or hot, they received a signal letting them know if it was low, medium or high in head
* Tested models of stimuli intensity
a. cue you give, has no affect and same neural response dependent on the sensory input (stimulus)
b. stimulus + expectation: what stimulus is and expectations driven by that cue
c. mathmatical equation based on weighted responses matched against internal predictions) and prediction - influence physiological and neural responses (prediction + error).
* The predictive coding is a weighted sum of the two components

What was found?

A
  • posterior ínsula exhibited neural patterns in line with detecting pain intensity - receives afferents from body (interoception)
  • anterior ínsula exhibited neural patterns in line with predictive coding of pain - integrates information from other modalities
  • these predicts are modality specific (pain -> can be very specific for a specific thing) rather than a general expectation of an aversive outcome (suggests why you might get specific aversions -> rather than a general aversion)
37
Q

in terms of the diagram, I’ll never look at.. what was found?

A

anything in blue, best fit for the stimulus intensity model
anything in orange, best fit for the stimulus prediction model
-> all posterior parts of the insula (interoceptive signals go in, are all blue where we receive the information but mid and anterior insula (where connections and modalities begin to happen) directly map onto prediction model and what we know about insula anatomical structure

38
Q

psychiatric disorders

A
  • large uncorrected prediction errors may lead to psychiatric conditions (and maladaptive behaviours)
  • maladaptive behaviours (i.e. avoidance and withdrawal)
  • maladaptive cognition (i.e. rumination and worry)
39
Q

how do psychiatric disorders work?

A

prior experiences -> predicted/expected bodily -> comparison to incoming afferent signals to your internal bodily state -(if there is no difference)-> minimal error and carry on as normal

-(big difference)-> big error and regulatory actions might kick in i.e. regulatory body loop, which changes physiological state using top-down efferent pathway to increase heart rate but also maladaptive behaviour are made to cope / manage these errors

40
Q

adaptive corrective actions will lead to healthy outcomes such as..

A
  • intact learning
  • recovery
  • resiliency
41
Q

while maladaptive corrective action leads to illness states such as…

A
  • exaggerated symptom intensity
  • symptom misinterpretation
  • autonomic hypervigilance
  • bodily preoccupation
  • worry/rumination
  • cognitive distortion
  • avoidance/escape behaviours
42
Q

what has been proposed about individuals (with psychiatric disorders) and interoceptive disorders?

A

focus more on bodily sensations -> may inhibit greater interoceptive predictive signals -> detect more predictive errors
* prediction of future aversive physical states may trigger aversive physical states (i.e. worrying about worrying may cause more anxiety as well as anxiety, worry and avoidance behaviours)

43
Q

how can we categorise panic disorder?

A

regular sudden attacks of panic or fear
* panic attack -> sudden onset of interoceptive signals, associated with fear/panic, dizziness, dyspnea (shortness of breath), palpitations, feeling of impending doom or death

44
Q

what does studies suggest about the insula for those with panic disorder?

A

increase grey matter volume in the insula (situated in posterior insula cortex -> influx of where all the signals come in)
-> insula relating to their symptoms?

45
Q

what might panic disorder patients misattribute their attacks about?

A
  • misattribute symptoms as a heart attack despite the physiological heart being healthy -> hypervelliance (anticipating of a physiological state which isn’t there or catastrophizing of normal increases in heart rate)
  • also misattribute events occurring at the same time as associated triggers -> leading to avoidance behaviours (greater cause of this)
  • experience anxiety over bodily signals, maladaptive behaviours and cognition
46
Q

what is panic disorder cycle?

A
  • external/internal event trigger -> increase in heart rate -> because misinterpreted
  • perceived normal increase in heart rate as potentially catastrophic (interoceptive - interpretation of cardiac disease)
  • lead to heart rate acceleration and anxiety
  • avoidance behaviours arise (withdrawal, agoraphobia etc)
  • vicious cycle which will continue
47
Q

[Pauli et al., 1991] 28 patients with panic attacks and 20 healthy controls went under 24 hours of ECG monitoring (heart rate) -> were asked to note down cardiac perceptions, anxiety and activities (minus sport).

What did they find?

A
  • similar variations in actual heart rate
  • panic attack patients rated higher levels of anxiety with associated cardiac perception (noticed heart beating -> greater anxiety than control -> shortening between cardiac cycle and increase in heart rate)
  • anxiety experienced in relation to heart perception, not related to anxiety level
  • PD patients reported a similar number of cardiac perceptions compared to control
  • could just be an artefact :/
  • PD patients felt more anxiety over perceived changes in heart rate, leading to further actual increase in heart rate
48
Q

what is the issue with bodily state in PD patients?

A

they experience a mismatch between actual and experienced bodily state -> anxiety over normal changes in cardio output
* regulate actual bodily state to minimise the mismatch -> increase heart rates -> further exacerbated anxiety -> vicious cycle repeats

49
Q

what does the cycle suggest about panic disorder?

A
  • cognitive states can further perpetuate PD symptoms
  • self is a manifestation of past and present cognitive, affective and body state experiences
  • past experiences can lead to maladaptive cognition expecting to experience certain physiological states and thus further perpetuate PD and panic attacks
50
Q

what causes these maladaptive errors?

A

BELIEF

  • changes in internal state of the individual, which may be due to an increased attentional biases toward threat, past trauma or belief
  • beliefs used to interpret internal bodily signals -> causing you to misinterpret these body signals
  • external cues or internal thoughts generate anticipation of aversive body states that set up a body prediction error -> which goes onto perpetuate maladaptive cognitions
51
Q

self-processing

A

when we look at maladaptive cognition states, leading to prediction errors, the insula cortex is a key area -> explains differences in PD insula cortex structures

52
Q

worrying is associated with increased activity where?

A

prefrontal cortex, striatum, and insula (Hoehn-Saric et al. 2004)

53
Q

guilt is linked to the?

A

left anterior insular cortex (Shin et al. 2000)

54
Q

sad self-relevant autobiographical memories are linked to?

A

activation in the ventral insula (Liotti et al. 2000)

55
Q

what is the somatic error hypothesis?

A

a predictive error coding theory
* psychiatric disorder (i.e. anxiety) may be a result of mismatches between anticipated and incoming bodily signals
* somatic errors -> body state predicted by the brain differ from the afferent signals of the body state

56
Q

what do somatic errors cause?

A
  • compensatory behaviour = psychiatric symptomology
  • prediction error causes cognitive and emotional symptomology
  • actions to reduce the discomfort and stress (i.e. agoraphobic) -> causes avoidance behaviours
  • brain overregulating the system, predictions detected from actual body state -> need to appoint where these predictions are detached from overly bodily state (and this is why panic disorder builds and builds)
57
Q

what did Dresler et al., (2011) research find?

A

patients suffering panic attacks in the fMRI scanner lead to termination of testing
* one removed beginning of discomfort
* one removed once in full panic attack

patients removed from the scanner first (prior to panic attack) only observed a decrease in prefrontal cortex activity
* decline in top-down control of emotions (maladaptive cognition of anticipation)
* top-down cognitive component in onset of panic attacks

58
Q

what is a somatic error?

A

body state predicted by the brain differs from the afferent signals of the body state

59
Q

how did patients feel panic in the scanner?

A

cognition/belief (scanner narrow [anticipating panic]) -> predicted body state of anxiety (increased heart rate, sweating, dizziness) -(error)-> actual body state [not the same as predicted] -> regulatory system update actual body state [increase heart rate to get rid of the error] -> changes actual body state [raised heart rate, increases anxiety -> believe heart rate is increasing and increasing, more anxiety and so on, in a vicious cycle]

60
Q

panic (without an example)

A

cognitions/beliefs -> predicted body state of anxiety -(error)-> actual body state -> regulatory system update actual body state -> changes actual body state -> believe heart rate is increasing etc., increasing anxiety

61
Q

what did full panic attack participants demonstrated?

A

significant insula and amygdala activity

62
Q

what is insula activity linked to?

A

discomfort feeling (detect prediction errors -> full on panic attack)

63
Q

what is amygdala activity linked to?

A

panic
(fit into system, signals from insula going back out of the body to change the heart rate which goes back into the brain)

64
Q

what does this tell us about panic disorder?

A
  • Maladaptive cognitions may be caused by initial deficits in predictive bodily state
  • Go on to perpetuate further the disorder through learned associations and deficits in top-down regulation
  • Insula is the hub with connections to prefrontal cortex, limbic system (including amygdala) and sensory interoceptive afferents
65
Q

what is maladaptive cognition caused by?

A

initial deficits in predictive bodily state

66
Q

how is the disorder further perpetuated?

A

through learned associations and deficits in top-down regulation

67
Q

the insula is the hub of?

A

connections to prefrontal cortex, limbic system (incl amygdala) and sensory interoceptive afferents

68
Q

what is more strongly associated with anxiety?

A

metacognition and interpretations

69
Q

where do bodily states actively generate from in the brain?

A

sensory inputs and regulatory actions

70
Q

what is our experienced based on?

A

future predictions and past experiences as well as current inputs

71
Q

what does somatic error hypothesis suggest?

A

large mismatches in predicted and actual states can lead to psychiatric conditions such as PD

72
Q

what does panic disorder result from?

A

mismatch between actual and predicted state (interpreting normal cardiac changes as catastrophic)

73
Q

what behaviours reduce mismatch (i.e. increased heart rate)

A

compensatory

74
Q

what may further perpetuate panic disorder?

A

further anxiety, maladaptive behaviours and cognitions