Clinical Reasoning Flashcards

1
Q

Premature Closure

A

Cloncluding evidence gathering and making a diagnosis prior to thorough reflection on all of the data. “Pattern recognition”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Flase consensus

A

a form of premature closure. You offer limited analysis and/or information because you believe that others have reached an identical conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Confirmatory bias

A

the tendency to seek or favor data that confirms one’s prefered diagnosis while ignoring or disregarding data that would disfavor the diagnosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Unintentional sequestration of data

A

pertinent information is unintentionally omitted by someone on the team (Clinical sign, previous medical history, etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Illusory transactive memory system

A

method by which people store and retrieve knowledge. The ullusory transactive memory system provides the medical team with a deceptive sense of security that because youre working with a team, someone before you got all of the data that you need
“Someone must have read the chart”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Contagious illusion

A

respect for authority or desire for consensus allows data to be interpreted as valid by others
Supervising clinician states that a collection of clinical signs means the patient has the disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Selective perception

A

your expectations influence your sense such that you can feel, hear or see something that you expect to hear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Primacy effect

A

initial events in the patient’s medical history or disease are weighted more heavily than events that occur later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Recency effect

A

the most recent events in the patient’s medical history or disease are weighted more heavily than events that occured later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Availability heuristic

A

estimating what is more likely by what is more available in your memory. bias towards vivid, unusual, or emotionally charged examples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Intrinsic errors

A

Time pressure
OVerconfidence
Faulty or incomplete data gathering (failure to obtain relevant data)
Knowledge gap or inexperience
Physical factors of doctor (fatigue, illness, familial)
Consciois or unconscious bias by the doctor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Systematic errors

A

Wrong site surgery
Failure of clinician or nurse to recognize documented drug interactions or patient allergies
Miscommunication/misunderstand of verbal orders
Mislabeling of syringes, fluid bags, or other items containing medication
Improper rate of admin of fluids
Equipment failure
Poor lay-out of facility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the steps of the clinical reasoning cycle

A

1) Acquire data
2) Summarize Data
3) List problems
4) Generate differentials
5) Justify differentials
6) Justify top differentials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Pattern Recognitions

A

“It just looks like this”
Pros: quick, cost effective, safer
Cons: Can lead to jumping to conclusions, bias, misdiagnosis-premature closure, differences in experience
“Hairy horse… it has Cushings”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Arborization/ Decision tree

A

Pros: Standardization, emergence situtations or referrals
Cons: Less for multifactorial disease, expensive, only as good as the designer, doesnt account for comorbid disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Exhaustive Search

A

Pros: Thorough, rare disease
Cons: Fishing with closed ended questions, time consuming

17
Q

Hypothetical-Deductive

A

hypothesis driven, develop hypotheses as you go along
Cons: requires a lot of experience