Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

ocr economics > ECONPLUSDAL THEME 3 > Flashcards

ECONPLUSDAL THEME 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Short run

A

When there is at least one fixed factor of production

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Law of Diminishing Returns

A

In the short run, when variable factors of production are added to a stock of fixed factors of production, total/marginal product will initially rise and then fall.
Rise: Labour productivity is increasing (specialisation/DoL takes place; stops underutilisation of fixed factors of production)
Fall: Labour productivity is decreasing (fixed factors of production constrain production)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Long Run

A

When all factors of production are variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explicit costs

A

Fixed costs - do not vary with output e.g. rent, salaries, interest on loans, advertising, business rates
Variable costs - vary with output e.g. wages, utility bills, raw material costs, transport costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Implicit costs

A

Opportunity costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Returns to scale

A

% change of output relative to % change of input

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Increasing returns to scale

A

When long-run average total cost declines as output increases due to economies of scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Decreasing returns to scale

A

When long-run average total cost increases as output increases due to diseconomies of scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Minimum efficient scale

A

The level of output at which all economies of scale are exhausted. The point on the LRAC curve where increasing returns to scale end, and constant returns begin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Economies of scale

A

A reduction in LRAC as output increases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Types of economies of scale

A

Internal: Really Fun Mums Try Making Pies
Risk Bearing
Financial
Managerial
Technical
Marketing
Purchasing

External:
Better transport infrastructure
Component suppliers move closer
R&D firms move closer
e.g. motorsport valley UK; Silicon Valley; Biomedical science in Cambridge (Astra Zeneca relocted HQ there)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Diseconomies of scale

A

An increase in LRAC as output increases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Types of diseconomies of scale

A

3Cs and an M
Control
Communication
Coordination
Motivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Characteristics of perfect competition

A

Many buyers and sellers
Homogeneous goods
Firms are price takers
No barriers to entry and exit
Perfect information
Firms are profit maximisers
Allocative, Productive, X efficiency
No dynamic efficiency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Accounting Profit

A

Total Revenue - Total Costs (explicit only)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Economic Profit

A

Total revenue minus total cost (includes explicit and implicit costs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Normal profit

A

0 economic profit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Supernormal profit

A

Any economic profit above normal profit - also known as abnormal profit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Subnormal profit

A

Negative economic profit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Profit maximisation

A

MR=MC
Can use COST PLUS PRICING but fails against competition

draw diagram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Reasons for profit maximisation

A

Allows reinvestment
Provides high dividends for shareholders
Lower costs and lower prices for consumers
Reward for Entrepreneurship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Reasons against profit maximisation

A

Knowledge of MR=MC
Greater scrutiny
Key stakeholders harmed (leads to satisficing instead)
Non-profit organisation e.g. NSPCC
Other objectives more appropriate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Profit satisficing

A

Between MR=MC and AR=AC
Sacrificing profit to satisfy as many key stakeholders as possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Stakeholders affected by profit satisficing

A

Shareholders
Managers

Beneficiaries:
Consumers
Workers/TUs
Government
Environment groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Revenue maximisation

draw diagram

A

MR=0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Reasons for revenue maximisation

A

Economies of scale (more Q than profit max)
Predatory pricing (lower price than profit max)
Principle Agent Problem
Perishable product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Principle Agent Problem

A

Divorce between ownership and control

Shareholders own a business and appoint directors and managers to run it on their behalf
SHAREHOLDERS AND MANAGERS WILL HAVE DIFFERENT OBJECTIVES
Shareholders want to maximize profits to maximize their dividends, whereas managers might have different motives, such as wanting to increase sales and revenue at the expense of profits
This divorce of ownership creates the principal-agent problem. The principal is the shareholder and the agent is the manager responsible for day to day running of the business
Often there can be conflict between shareholders and managers, as managers may increase costs to benefit the business at the expense of profits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Sales/growth maximisation

A

AC=AR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Reasons for sales maximisation

A

Economies of scale
Limit pricing
Principle agent problem
Flood the market

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Why Firms Want to Grow

A

1) Profits - to generate more profits to give shareholders a better return (dividends)
2) Costs - to benefit from economies of scale, resulting in lower unit costs of production
3) Market power - to become a more dominant force in their market; if a firm dominates the market it can increase its prices e.g. Etisalat/du
4) Reducing risk - firms might want to diversify so that if sales drop in one market they have another market to generate sales e.g. Virgin
5) Managerial motives - senior managers may wish to grow in order to control a larger business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Why some firms prefer to stay small

A

1) Lack of finance for expansion
2) Avoiding diseconomies of scale (unit costs increase)
3) Regulation (red tape)
4) Offering a more personal service as they get to know customers and their needs; acting as suppliers; and acting as local monopolies at specific times e.g. local newsagents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Constraints on Business Growth

A

Government regulation preventing mergers or takeovers (CMA) - These may be disapproved as the government may feel that they might form a monopoly
Access to finance - Firms may not have enough money to takeover a business
Size of the market - If the market is very small it may be difficult for businesses to gain more market share in the market as there are simply not a lot of customers in the market
Growth may not be an objective of the owners. Other objectives could be ethical, profit satisficers etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Organic growth

A

A firm increasing its size internally e.g. increasing sales or expanding the workforce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Inorganic Growth

A

A firm increasing externally e.g. merger/takeover

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Other business objectives

A

Survival –> brand loyalty
Public sector organisations (P=MC - allocative efficiency)
Corporate social responsibility (CSRs) - The Body Shop doesn’t test products on animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Barriers to Entry

A

Any obstacle that prevents a new firm entering a market

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Types of Barriers to Entry

A

LLOYD’S TSB
Legal (Patents; licences; red tape; standards/regulations; insurance)
Technical (Start-up costs; sunk costs; economies of scale; natural monopoly)
Strategic (predatory pricing; limit pricing; heavy advertising)
Brand Loyalty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Barriers to exit

A

Any obstacle that prevents a firm leaving a market

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Types of barriers to exit

A

Undervaluation of assets
Redundancy costs
Penalties for leaving contracts early
Sunk costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Allocative efficiency

A

Where resources follow consumer demand
Where society surplus is maximised
Where net social benefit is maximised
D=S; MSB=MSC, AR=P=MC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Productive efficiency

A

When a firm is operating at the lower point on their AC curve
Full exploitation of economies of scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

X efficiency

A

Minimising waste
Production on the AC curve

Happens for monopolies and public sector firms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Dynamic efficiency

A

Re-investment of LR supernormal profit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Shutdown point

A

Short term: lowest point of the AVC curve
Long term: lowest point of the ATC curve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Break even condition

A

AR=AC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Characteristics of a monopoly

A

One seller dominating the market (pure monopoly or monopoly power)
Differentiated products
Firm is a price maker
High barriers to entry/exit
Imperfect information
Firm is a profit maximiser

Dynamic efficiency
Allocatively, productively, x inefficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Price discrimination

A

Where a firm charge different prices to different consumers for an identical good/service with no differences in costs of production

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Conditions for price discrimination

A

Price making ability
Information to separate the market
Prevent re-sale (market seepage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

1st degree price discrimination

A

Practice of charging each customer the price they are willing to pay. All consumer surplus turned into monopoly profit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

2nd degree price discrimination

A

Practice of charging different prices per unit for different quantities of the same good or service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

3rd degree price discrimination

A

Practice of dividing consumers into two or more groups, one with elastic demand and one with inelastic demand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Pros of price discrimination

A

Dynamic efficiency
Economies of scale
Some consumers benefit
Cross subsidisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Dynamic efficiency
Economies of scale
Some consumers benefit
Cross subsidisation

A

ALLOCATIVE INEFFICIENCY
Inequalities
Anti-competitive pricing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

Characteristics of a natural monopoly

A

Huge fixed costs
Enormous potential for economies of scale (LRAC slopes down for ages)
Rational for 1 firm to supply the entire market - competition is undesirable
Competition would result in a wasteful duplication of resources and non-exploitation of full economies of scale –> Allocative & Productive inefficiency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

Benefits of a natural monopoly

A

Gains in productive efficiency due to massive scale
Can be regulated to achieve allocative efficiency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

Costs of a natural monopoly

A

Can charge as high a price as they want due to no alternatives
Information gaps regarding price caps

57
Q

Regulation in a natural monopoly

A

Profit maximisation is at far too low a quantity. Regulators require supply at P=MC - allocative efficiency. This is loss-making for the monopolist, so the government subsidises the subnormal profit

58
Q

Pros of a monopoly

A

Dynamic efficiency
Greater economies of scale
Natural monopoly

Cross subsidisation (A cross-subsidy is a situation in which one group of customers or clients is charged a higher price for a product or service in order to subsidize a lower price for another group.)

59
Q

Cons of a monopoly

A

Allocative inefficiency
Productive inefficiency
X inefficiency
Inequalities in necessity markets

60
Q

Monopoly evaluation

A

TEND CROP

Type of good/service (luxury vs necessity)
EoS or DoS?
Natural monopoly
Dynamic efficiency?
Competition or threat thereof…
Regulation
Objective
Price discrimination

61
Q

Pros of competitive markets

A

Allocative efficiency
Productive efficiency
X-efficiency
Jobs

62
Q

Cons of competitive markets

A

Lack of dynamic efficiency
Lack of economies of scale
Cost cutting in dangerous areas
Creative destruction

63
Q

Evaluation of competitive markets

A

Still dynamic efficiency?
Level of EoS
Natural monopoly
Where is cost cutting taking place?
–> role for regulation?
State vs dynamic efficiency
–> type of good/service

64
Q

Characteristics of monopolistic competition

A

Many buyers and sellers
Slightly differentiated goods
Firms are price makers, but only slightly
Price elastic demand
Low barriers to entry and exit
Good information
Non-Price competition
Firms are profit maximisers

65
Q

Examples of Monopolistic Competition

A

Taxis since Uber
Clothing
Restaurants
Hairdressers/salons
Hotels
Music Streaming
Coffee Shops
Bars/Nightclubs
Key Cutting and Shoe Repairs

66
Q

Efficiency of Monopolistic Competition

A

X efficient
Allocatively, productively, and dynamically inefficient
BUT
More allocatively efficient than monopolies (some competition); variation might make inefficiency desirable over perfect competition.
More productively efficient than monopolies (must minimise costs); might be exploiting more economies of scale than perfect competition, or could just be byproduct of differentiation.
Dynamic efficiency could be part of competition e.g. clothes design

67
Q

N-firm concentration ratio

A

The collective market share of the n largest firms in an industry

68
Q

Characteristics of an oligopoly

A

Few firms dominate the market
–> high concentration ratio
Differentiated goods
–> firms are price makers
High barriers to entry/exit
Interdependence
–> price rigidity
Non-price competition
Profit maximisation not sole objective

69
Q

Kinked demand curve

A

The demand curve for an oligopolist, which is based on the assumption that rivals will match a price decrease (inelastic) and will ignore a price increase (elastic)

No need to change price - vertical MR gap at existing price, so a shift of MC within the gap keeps it as the point of greatest profit

70
Q

Results of oligopoly

A

Price wars: Repeatedly cutting prices to outcompete others
Predatory pricing: Pricing low to force competitors out of the market
Limit pricing: Pricing low to stop new firms from entering the market

71
Q

Non-Price Competition

A

Promotion
Loyalty
Brand image
Attractive packaging
Higher quality

72
Q

Oligopoly Game Theory

A

Prisoner’s dilemma: both make more money by lowering their prices –> both lower prices –> inelasticity makes them both earn less than if they both set prices high. Encourages collusion, but an incentive to cheat the agreement exists

73
Q

Competitive oligopoly

A

Price or non-price competition

Factors promoting competitive oligopoly:
Large no. of firms (low concentration)
New market entry possible
One firm with significant cost advantage
Homogenous goods
Saturated market

74
Q

Collusive oligopoly

A

Overt or tacit (price leadership)

Factors promoting collusive oligopoly:
Small no. of firms
Similar costs
High entry barriers
Ineffective competition policy
Consumer loyalty/inertia make cheating less likely

75
Q

Characteristics of a contestable market

A

THREAT OF ENTRY
Low barriers to entry/exit
Large pool of potential entrants
Good information
Incumbent firms subject to ‘hit & run’ competition

76
Q

Technology and contestability

A

Lower barriers to entry/exit (no need for physical firm)
Greater pool of potential entrants (more innovation to disrupt markets; find cheaper methods of production)
Improved information

77
Q

Benefits of contestability

A

Movement towards limit price:
Allocative efficiency
Productive efficiency
X-efficiency
Job creation

78
Q

Costs of contestability

A

Lack of dynamic efficiency
Cost cutting in dangerous areas
Creative destruction
Anti-competitive strategies

79
Q

Evaluation of contestability

A

Length of contestability
Role of technology
Regulation
Dynamic efficiency

80
Q

Government intervention to promote contestability

A

BMPSPC

Reduce barriers to entry (deregulation)
Monitor monopsonies to avoid price setting (2011: 9 supermarkets in the UK found to be fixing the price of milk/chees - Tesco alone fined £10mn)
Intervene to prevent anti-competitive pricing
Subsidise start-ups
Privatisation (profit motive –> efficiency –> lower costs –> lower prices)
Competitive tendering (but firms may cut costs in important areas to bid lower) e.g. used in movement of prisoners, hospital catering/cleaning, producing army tanks

81
Q

Benefits of government intervention

A

Lower prices; higher consumer surplus
Higher quality
More competition –> more choice
More productive/allocative/dynamic efficiency

82
Q

Drawbacks of government intervention

A

Government failure (regulatory capture; asymmetric information)

83
Q

Who enacts competition policy?

A

Competition and Markets Authority
Overlooks regulatory bodies (ORR, CAA, OFCOM, OFWAT, OFGEM)
European Competition Commission (EU)

84
Q

What are the aims of competition policy?

A

PROTECT PUBLIC INTEREST
Prevent excessive/predatory/limit pricing
Promote competition
Ensure quality, standards and choice
Regulate natural monopolies/Ensure effective privatisation of natural monopolies
Promote technological innovation

85
Q

When will a merger be investigated?

A

If it results in a 25% market share or more
If it has a combined turnover above £70mn
Investigation does not mean it will be blocked (Lloyds and TSB merged - market share of 35%)
Examples: Asda/Sainsbury; Just Eat/Hungryhouse; Ladbrokes/Coral - had to sell 400 shops)

86
Q

When will competition authorities intervene?

A

Antitrust & cartel agreements
Investigate mergers
Liberalise concentrated markets
Monitor state aid control

87
Q

Methods of monopoly regulation

A

ACTING AS A SURROGATE FOR COMPETITION

Price regulation (RPI, RPI-X, RPI+K) BUT level of X/K?; Cost; Incentive to keep reducing RPI-X; Regulatory capture

Quality control/Performance targets e.g. Trains, Gas/Electricity, NHS unintended consequences; ‘game the system’

Profit control covering costs and adding % return on capital employed BUT Asymmetric information; incentive to raise costs; incentive to over-employ capital

Windfall taxes on profit BUT Worsen monopoly outcomes; tax evasion/avoidance; less innovation; under-reporting of profit

Merger policy; privatisation; deregulation; reducing trade barriers

88
Q

Evaluation of monopoly regulation

A

GOVERNMENT FAILURE:
Level of information
Costs vs benefits
Regulatory capture

Benefits of monopoly

89
Q

Benefits of Price capping

A

Appropriate way to prevent natural monopolies or dominant firms from making excessive profits at the expense of consumers
Allows cuts in price levels - increase consumer surplus
Improve productive efficiency out of necessity (suitable when RPI+K is used)

90
Q

Drawbacks of Price Capping

A

Job losses as firms cut costs to make profit
Asymmetric information –> cap too high
Lower profits to reinvest

91
Q

Benefits of profit regulation

A

Encourages lowering prices - higher consumer surplus
May mean lower costs for businesses using the product or service e.g. lower electricity prices if energy market regulated

92
Q

Drawbacks of profit regulation

A

Asymmetric information –> difficult to understand business costs and rates of return –> can fudge the numbers?
Little incentive for monopolists to minimise costs (won’t gain profit) –> productive inefficiency
May employ too much capital to enjoy return

93
Q

Advantages of privatisation

A

Allocative efficiency up
X inefficiency down
Efficiency incentive which drives dynamic efficiency

94
Q

Disadvantages of privatisation

A

Limited competition –> productive and allocative inefficiency
Loss making services cut even if socially desirable
Loss of natural monopoly and loss of economies of scale benefits –> productive inefficiency

95
Q

Evaluation of privatisation

A

The level of competition post privatisation
Level of government regulation

96
Q

Advantages of deregulation

A

More firms will increase consumer choice –> incentive for firms to be allocatively efficient
Productive and X efficiency rise
More dynamic efficiency

97
Q

Disadvantages of deregulation

A

Loss of natural monopoly (AC up, productive efficiency down, wasteful duplication of resources –> allocative inefficiency)
Formation of oligopolies and local monopolies

98
Q

Evaluation of deregulation

A

Short run vs long run
Height of other barriers to entry
Level of government regulation against anti-competitive behavior

99
Q

Advantages of nationalisation

A

Greater economies of scale
More focus on service provision (allocative efficiency)
Less likely to be market failures arising from externalities
Public sector can be a vehicle for macro-economic control

100
Q

Disadvantages of nationalisation

A

Diseconomies of scale
Lack of incentive to minimise costs
Complacent & wasteful production (X-inefficiency)
Lack of supernormal profit
Highly expensive and a burden on the tax payer
Higher prices due to low competition
Greater risk of moral hazard
Political priorities override commercial issues

101
Q

Evaluation of nationalisation

A

Funding vs delivery of key public services
PPPs better?
Role of regulation?
Competition in private sector
Size and objective of private sector firms

102
Q

Merger

A

The joining together of two or more firms under common ownership

103
Q

Horizontal Integration

A

When businesses in the same sector merge e.g. secondary sector

104
Q

Vertical Integration

A

When businesses in different sectors merge e.g. a business in the secondary sector and a business in the tertiary sector

105
Q

Forward Vertical Integration

A

When a business merges with a business in the next sector e.g. secondary takes over tertiary

106
Q

Backwards Vertical Integration

A

When a business merges with a business in the previous sector e.g. secondary sector merges with primary sector

107
Q

Conglomerate

A

A merging of two firms in different industries e.g. a tobacco company buying an insurance company

108
Q

Advantages of a Horizontal Merger

A

May allow reductions in average costs due to economies of scale.
Can reduce competition in the market by taking out a competitor.
It can allow one firm to buy unique assets owned by another part of the world.
It allows a business to grow in a market where it already has knowledge and expertise. This is likely to make the merger more successful.
Spreading risk.

109
Q

Disadvantages of a Horizontal Merger

A

Often pay too much for the firm they are buying.
Integration of the two firms is too often poorly managed and many of the key workers may leave following the acquisition could lead to a loss of jobs due to duplication of jobs.
Different cultures in businesses (culture clash).
Diseconomies of scale.

110
Q

Advantages of a Backward Vertical Merger

A

May be cost savings - integrating a supplier into the firm may make the firm more efficient.
May reduce risk e.g. A supplier might have a technology that it could offer to rival firms and give them a competitive advantage. A supplier might unexpectedly refuse to sell its product to the firm.
Better access to raw materials.

111
Q

Disadvantages of a Vertical Merger

A

May have little expertise in the industry.
Firms often pay too much for the firm they take over, and the share price falls.
There can be difficulties in merging the two firms together into one firm. Either the costs of creating a single firm from two separate firms are too great or the two firms fail to integrate, but costs rise because extra layers of management are needed to control the new, larger firm.
Many of the key workers in the firm that has been taken over may leave, taking with them much of the expertise that made it successful.
Diseconomies of scale.
Culture clash.

112
Q

Advantages of a Forwards Vertical Merger

A

May be cost savings - integrating a buyer into the firm may make the firm more efficient; economies of scale.
May reduce risk e.g. a buyer could decide to buy from another firm.
Could give a firm more control over its market e.g. if a firm owned another firm that bought its products, it could decide at what price to sell the product and in what markets. It could better control branding of the products.
Have a place to sell their product.

113
Q

Advantages of a Conglomerate

A

Reduces risk - buying another firm operating in a completely different market means that a firm is not so dependent on the ups and downs of one market.
A conglomerate may find it easier to expand compared to a situation where the companies and operations were independent. Size gives a conglomerate more options to obtain finance to expand the business. Successful senior managers can be transferred from company to company depending on their need.
Could be an opportunity for asset stripping. Some companies specialise in buying other companies which they see as having more valuable individual assets than the buying price of the company.

114
Q

Disadvantages of a Conglomerate

A

Firms do not have expertise in the market into which they buy.
Asset stripping benefits the stripper; hurts workers (lose jobs), customers (lose products), and local economies (lost jobs; derelict industrial sites).
Often pay too much for the firm they are buying.
Integration of the two firms is too often poorly managed and many of the key workers may leave following the acquisition.
Diseconomies of scale.
Culture clash

115
Q

Competition and Markets Authority (CMA)

A

An independent, non-ministerial government department, which works to promote competition between providers so that customers benefit.

116
Q

Demerger

A

When a business sells off one or more of the businesses that it owns into a separate company

117
Q

Reasons for Demergers

A
  • Cultural differences
  • Creating more focused firms
  • Protecting the value of the firm
  • Reducing the risk of diseconomies of scale
  • Raising money from asset sales and return to shareholders
  • To meet requirements of competition authority regulators (CMA 0 Competition and Markets Authority)
118
Q

Business Benefits of a Demerger

A
  • Allowing focus on the core business
  • Raising funds from selling parts of the business
  • Removing loss-making parts of the business
  • Avoids clash of cultures
119
Q

Worker Benefits of a Demerger

A
  • Increased job security if loss-making parts of the business are demerged
  • Reduced conflict between cultures
  • Could negotiate higher wages
120
Q

Consumer Benefits of a Demerger

A
  • Greater competition leads to lower prices
  • More focused businesses are able to better meet consumer needs as quality may be better
121
Q

Monopsony

A

Only one buyer of a good in a market e.g. Network Rail/track maintenance
Has buyer power

122
Q

Impacts of a monopsony on itself

A

+Lower costs…
+More profit
+Allows more investment
-Potential fines
-Suppliers might have to lower quality of their goods

123
Q

Impacts of a monopsony on the suppliers

A

+Encourages efficiency
+Could eventually become a monopoly
-Less revenue
-Might have to leave the market

124
Q

Impacts of a monopsony on consumers

A

+Lower prices may be passed on
-Lower quality of goods

125
Q

Impacts of a monopsony on its employees

A

+Profits may be passed on to them
-Might invest in automation e.g. self-checkout
-May question employer’s ethics

126
Q

Impacts of a monopsony on the suppliers’ employees

A

+None
-Revenue falls so might need to cut costs (lower wages, redundancies)

127
Q

Factors impacting demand for labour

A

Demand for goods and services (labour is a derived demand)
Price of capital (machinery) –> capital labour substitution
Economic climate
Productivity of workers

128
Q

Factors that impact the supply of labour

A

Wage rate (pecuniary benefits) - short term: wages up –> supply up, but eventually will fall (no point in money if no time to spend it) - work is an inferior good
Income tax
Non-pecuniary benefits
Trade union presence
Social trends e.g. immigration, emigration (brain drain), demographics

129
Q

Market failure in the labour market

A

Geographical immobility of labour (expensive/hard to move/commute; high house prices; don’t want to move away from family/friends)
Occupational immobility of labour (lack skills e.g. due to structural changes) - short term difficult, but long term people can retrain

130
Q

Policies to improve labour mobility & incentives

A

Occupational mobility: subsidize uni fees; better funding for workplace training; teaching new skills e.g. coding; expand apprenticeships/internships
Geographical mobility: HS2; rise in house-building; regional policy to create new jobs
Incentives: subsidise childcare; higher NMW/LW; cut income tax; welfare reforms

131
Q

Benefits of a minimum wage

A

Reduces poverty
Improve incentives to work
Higher disposable income for poor workers (higher mpc)
Promotes equality among workers

132
Q

Drawbacks of a minimum wage

A

Unemployment
Higher variable costs –> lower profit –> less investment; redundancy
Makes UK businesses internationally uncompetitive
Higher costs –> higher prices/inflation –> lower real incomes
Less investment –> less dynamic efficiency

133
Q

National Living Wage

A

Rising at least until 2020
Min wage >25 y/o
Higher than min wage; increases faster
By 2020, will be 60% median earnings (£9)
Workers on min/living wage triples 2015-20
Min wage lower than France/Australia; higher than USA
Firms could react by investment (training/automation), job cuts, higher prices etc.
Responses: Waitrose stopped paying Sunday/overtime rates for new workers; Caffe Nero eliminated free lunch

134
Q

Benefits of a maximum wage

A

Corbyn suggested it would be an effective way of reducing inequality
Will lower costs –> Profits up –> investment –> dynamic efficiency

135
Q

Costs of a maximum wage

A

Brain drain
Can be circumvented e.g. dividends, bonuses
Not much money saved for multi-billion dollar companies
Tax evasion (Laffer curve)
Highest pay reflects highest responsibility; incentive for entrepreneurship

136
Q

Labour market issues

A

Skills shortages (immobility of labour)
Young workers struggle to break into the workforce (last in, first out etc.)
Retirement (rising life expectancy –> pensions make up over 50% of welfare spending)
Wage inequality (highest wages grow faster)
Zero-hour contracts
Gig economy (difficult to get mortgage; no holiday pay)
Migration –> lower wages

137
Q

Factors affecting elasticity of demand for labour

A

COST

Costs (proportion in business)
Output’s PED - can price be increased instead?
Substitutes (machinery?)
Time

138
Q

Elasticity of supply of labour

A

Time to acquire skills to enter the market, so inelastic in the short run, but elastic in the long run
May be inelastic if they can recruit from overseas

139
Q

Specialisation

A

The concentration of production ona narrow range of goods and services

ocr economics (25 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions