Meta-ethics Flashcards
plato on good
- Form of Good – the term good has many meanings
- Good is a singular spiritual being, it has a greater reality than the objects of our perception
- Good is a natural fact, but one that is outside of our everyday experience
ethical naturalism summary
- Moral judgements are true or false (moral realist view), and such judgements are reducible entirely to the concepts of natural science
- Morals are objectively true, absolute facts of the natural world
ethical naturalism - Bradley
must look at wider society to find good
ethical naturalism - aquinas
o Aquinas links goodness to divine will and humans’ telos. These lead to a following of the 5 PPs, which are good
ethical naturalism - foot summary
o Moral good can be observed in the form of virtues pursued by individuals e.g. we can tell if someone is not trustworthy, there must be some absolute morality in order to recognise this
o Virtues and following of these virtues can be observed and therefore good can be observed
general postives of ethical naturalism
- Believing moral claims are nothing but opinions means there are never any objective values or truths = anarchy. - - - Naturalism provides a basis for human rights.
general negatives of ethical naturalism
- Nature can be misunderstood, could potentially justify evil things e.g. evidential problem of evil + Naturalistic fallacy
- If nature is fallen (Augustine), how can you advocate morality based on a nature that is inclined towards sin?
ethical naturalism criticism - Moore
- G. E. Moore
o Puts forward naturalistic fallacy due to his open question technique
intuitionism - Moore
‘Good is Good, and that is the end of the matter.’
o Agrees with Hume’s fact-value gap, ( cannot move from a descriptive statement like to a moral statement)
general positives of intuitionism
~~~
- Situational
- Allows for more control
- Morally realist, offers a sense of moral duty/motive.
general negatives of intuitionism
- Relative, could lead to bad actions if conflicting principles
- Not practical in terms of deciding moral rules
- Intuitionism is based solely on introspection, subjective
intuitionism - criticisms of Moore
o Moore claims we are able to recognise non-natural properties e.g. good but how are to know it is not a creation of our minds?
o If we only know good by a process of intuition, how can we properly discuss our views and decide whose intuition is superior? Not helpful in moral disagreement
what are the 2 non cognitive ethical strands
emotivism - ♣ Moral judgements are neither true or false, merely expressions of feelings of those who utter them (AYER)
prescriptivism - ♣ Ethical language is individuals’ attempt to get others to conform with their moral viewpoints, persuasive
(STEVENSON)
emotivism - ayer
- Moral judgements are neither true or false, merely expressions of feelings
- Rejected intuitionism as intuitions are unverifiable and meaningless
emotivism - boo hurrah
- Moral judgements are internal – based on feeling
- When you say something is good/bad you express your reaction to it: either boo (dislike) or hurrah (like and approval)
- in saying that an action is right or wrong, I am not making any factual statement, I am expressing moral sentiments. (Ayer)