Studies Flashcards

1
Q

Describe Labovs New York Study πŸ›οΈ 4️⃣

A

1) Went to diff supermarkets marked by class πŸͺ

2) Looked at item on fourth floor

2) Asked staff to see where he could find said item, where they would say the β€˜fourth floor’

3) Then asked them to repeat it

% of β€˜R’ pronunciation πŸ“ˆ across all
ESPECIALLY in lower middle class where 🟰 even more than upper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

WHAT was Labov trying to find in his study?

A

Whether the pronunciation of β€˜R’ sound 🟰 CHANGED depending on class πŸ‘₯

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

WHAT did the results show in Labovs New York study? 3️⃣

A

1) The β€˜R’ pronunciation DID changed dependent on class [⬆️ = β€˜R’ ⬇️ = ❌]

2) Most people associated the β€˜right’ pronunciation with the upper classes pronunciation ( βœ… R)

3) The lower middle class HYPER CORRECTED, probably to emulate upper mid class

β€”> over-prod R sound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is it called when you pronounce the R sound?

A

Rhotic pronunciation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

WHICH 2️⃣ variables did Trudgill πŸ‘οΈ at? lπŸ«±πŸ»β€πŸ«²πŸΎπŸ§πŸΏβ€β™€οΈπŸ§πŸΏβ€β™€οΈπŸ§πŸΏβ€β™€οΈπŸšΆβ€β™€οΈ

A

1) Subject-verb agreement w/t 3️⃣rd πŸ§πŸΏβ€β™€οΈ singular [*’She say’ vs β€˜She says’]

2) Pronunciation of -ing ending [’walkin’ vs β€˜walking’]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

WHAT were the 5️⃣ definitive social classes Trudgill used? β˜πŸΎπŸ†™

A

1) Middle Middle Class (MMC)
2) Lower Middle Class (LMC)
3) Upper Working Class (UWC)
4) Middle Working Class (MWC)
5) Lower Working Class (LWC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Trudgill look for in his Norwich study❓1️⃣❗️2️⃣❗️3️⃣❗️

A

Looked at how frequently informants used non-standard English ❌ by making diff scenarios

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define INFORMANT in research + example πŸ”‘πŸ«

A

A person that shares knowledge with a researcher from an Insider POV

(e.g. KEY informant = person selected as primary link between naive researcher and cultural group studied)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

RESULTS of Trudgills Norwich study ❓3️⃣ πŸ‘₯πŸ‘₯πŸ€£πŸ‘©β€β€οΈβ€πŸ‘¨

A

1) πŸ‘₯ of ⬇️ Class 🟰 βž•βž•βž• ❌ NON Standard forms
VS
πŸ‘₯ of ⬆️ class πŸŸ°βž•βž•βž• βœ… Standard forms

2) πŸ‘₯ use βž•βž•βž• Standard Lang forms when feel like they’re being scrutinised [e.g. interviews]
AND
βž•βž•βž• ❌ NON Standard forms when [e.g telling funny story]

3) MEN πŸ”΅ πŸŸ°βž•βž•βž• likely to use ❌ NON Standard forms of Eng than WOMEN 🩷 regardless of Social class πŸ’¬

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

WHAT is the reasoning for the gender results in Trudgills Norwich studyβ“πŸŽ‰ πŸ”΅Β»πŸ©·

A

❌ NON standard English Language features 🟰 βž•βž•βž• widely accepted πŸ€—πŸ€—/celebrated πŸŽ‰ for MEN than WOMEN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

WHAT did the results of the gender aspect of Trudgills Norwich study reveal about gender roles? πŸ‘©β€πŸ³πŸ‹οΈ

A

Showed SIGNIFICANT influence of gender roles in society

women expectation 🟰 β€˜proper’/β€˜well mannered’ πŸ˜ŠπŸ˜‡

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

CRITICISM on Trudgills Norwich Studyβ“πŸ§πŸ’­

A

He ❌ acknowledge conscious 🧠 linguistic choices of subjs

E.G.
convergence/identity🫡🏾/integration with community πŸ‘₯πŸ‘₯

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

WHEN was Trudgills Norwich study❓

A

1960s - 70s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly