Interference Theory of Forgetting Flashcards

1
Q

What store does forgetting usually refer to?

A

LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Interference

A

The theory that forgetting is due to other information in our LTM interfering with our ability to retrieve a memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Proactive Interference

A

When our old memories affect newer memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What can cause proactive interference?

A

Competition between information, when the incorrect response is strong and the correct response is very weak.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Retroactive Interference

A

When our new memories affect our older memories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What causes retroactive interference?

A

The correct response is hard to retrieve, the incorrect response is highly accessible, the information is very similar.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

McGeoch and McDonald (1931) - Aim

A

To investigate retroactive interferences by changing the similarity of two sets of information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

McGeoch and McDonald (1931) - Procedure

A

Participants learnt a list of 10 words until they could remember them with 100% accuracy. They then learned a new list of words, and were placed in one of six conditions:
1. Synonyms
2. Antonyms
3. Unrelated words
4. Nonsense syllables
5. Three-digit numbers
6. No new list - participants rested
Participants then had to recall the original list of words.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

McGeoch and McDonald (1931) - Findings

A

The recall of the original list depended on their second list. Those in the synonyms condition recalled fewer words than those in the other conditions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

McGeoch and McDonald (1931) - Conclusion

A

Forgetting through interference happens most when the information is most similar.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which type of interference does McGeoch and McDonald demonstrate?

A

Retroactive Interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

McGeoch and McDonald (1931) - Strengths

A
  • Multiple conditions used allows findings to be compared.
  • High control of extraneous variables, meaning for increased validity.
  • Control allows for accurate replication - good reliability.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

McGeoch and McDonald (1931) - Limitations

A
  • Artificial task - lacks mundane realism, lowered validity. This lowers generalisability to real-life situations.
  • Artificial setting - low ecological validity.
  • Lab experiment may cause for demand characteristics.
  • The experiment took place in a short time frame. This lacks application to real-life as most forgetting would take place over a longer period of time.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Keppel and Underwood (1962) - Aim

A

To examine the effect of proactive interference on long-term memory, in an experiment that resembles Peterson and Peterson (1959).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Keppel and Underwood (1962) - Procedure

A

Participants were presented with meaningless three-letter consonant trigrams at different intervals (increasing in threes). To prevent rehearsal, the participants had to count backwards in threes before recalling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Keppel and Underwood (1962) - Findings

A

Participants typically remembered the trigrams that were presented first, irrespective of the interval length.

17
Q

Keppel and Underwood (1962) - Conclusion

A

The earlier trigrams of consonants had transferred to LTM, and as the following information was similar, it made learning and therefore, remembering the new trigrams more difficult.

18
Q

Which type of interference does Keppel and Underwood (1962) demonstrate?

A

Proactive Interference

19
Q

Keppel and Underwood (1962) - Strengths

A
  • Supported by Peterson and Peterson’s research, good reliability.
  • High control of extraneous variables, good validity.
  • Control allows for accurate replication - good reliability.
20
Q

Keppel and Underwood (1962) - Limitations

A
  • Artificial task - lacks mundane realism, low validity, low generalisability to real-life situations.
  • Artificial setting - low ecological validity.
  • Possibility of demand characteristics.
  • Carried out within a short time frame, limited application to real-life situations.
21
Q

Interference Theory - Strengths

A
  • Supporting evidence from McGeoch and McDonald.
  • Supporting evidence from Keppel and Underwood.
  • Good testability - research is replicable and reliable.
  • Supporting evidence from Baddeley and Hitch (1977) - asked rugby players to remember names of the teams they played that season. Found that recall was better when there were less games in the meantime, not the amount of time in the meantime. Supports retroactive interference, and is more applicable than lab studies.
22
Q

Interference Theory - Limitations

A
  • Opposing theory - retrieval failure.
  • Limited testability - artificial tasks and environments used in research.
  • Limited usefulness - findings from research lack useful application, due to the artificial experiments.
  • Contradictory evidence from Tulving and Psotka (1971) - gave participants five lists of 24 words, each organised in six categories. Found that recall was 70% for the first list, and fell for the others. However, recall was back at 70% when participants were cued with category names. Shows that information that is supposedly lost, is still in the LTM just not easily accessed.