Civil Procedure Flashcards

1
Q

Third Party Complaint Pleading Standard

A

An original defendant may only implead a third party by alleging derivative liability.

The original defendant may not merely claim that the plaintiff sued the wrong plaintiff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Grounds for a New Trial

A

Proper grounds for a new trial include:
1. Verdict is against the weight of evidence
2. Juror misconduct
3. Inadequate verdict.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Elements of Claim Preclusion

AKA Res Judicata

A

Res judicata applies when three elements are present:

1. the decision was a final judgment on the merits; and

2. the same cause of action and the same parties or their privies were involved in both cases.

3. The same claim (cause of action) is asserted in the prior and subsequent case (same T/O)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Elements of Issue Preclusion

AKA Collateral Estoppel

A

1) the former judgment must be valid and final;

2) the same issue is being brought;

3) the issue is essential to the judgement;

4) the issue was actually litigated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Traditional Bases for Personal Jurisdiction

A
  1. Domicile
  2. Physical Presence in Jurisdiction @ Time of Service
  3. Consent
  4. Waiver

FRCP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Long-Arm/Constitutional Basis for Personal Jurisdiction

A

Assertion of personal jursidiction must not offend traditional notions of fair play or substantial justice.

Steps to Establishing PJ

  1. Long-Arm Statute: need a long arm statute.
  2. Minimum Contacts: must establish purposeful availment and foreseeability
  3. Relatedness: whether the party’s contacts with jurisdiction are related to the claim.
  4. Fairness: assertion of jurisdiction must be fair
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Personal Jurisdiction Fairness Considerations

A
  1. The inconvenience to the defendant,
  2. The state’s interest in hearing the action and protecting the parties
  3. Interstate efficiency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Where is Venue Proper?

FRCP

A

Venue is proper in any judicial district where:

  1. Any defendant resides (if the defendants all reside in the same district), or
  2. A substantial part of the events giving rise to the cause of action occurred, OR
  3. If 1 and 2 are not feasible, any district where any defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Where is Venue Proper?

California

A

General Rule: venue is proper in any county where any defendant resides.

Contract Disputes: county where contract was entered into or performed

Personal Injury: county where injury occurred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Choice of Law When Venue is Transferred

A

If Venue Was Proper
* Diversity Cases: apply the law that would have been applied by the transferor court.
* Federal Question Cases: federal law

If Venue Was Improper
* Diversity Cases: the court must apply the CoL rules of the state the transferee court is sitting
* Federal Question Cases: apply federal law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ex Parte Issuance of a TRO

FRCP

A

Rule: the court may issue a TRO without notice to the non-moving party only if:
1. Specific facts in an affidavit or verified complaint clearly show that immediate and irreparable harm will result to the movant before the non-moving party can be heard, AND
2. The movant’s attorney certifies in writing any efforts made to give notice to the non-moving party and why notice should not be required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Relate Back Doctrine: Amended Pleading that Adds New Party

FRCP

A

If a pleading is amended to add a party to the complaint, the defendants will relate back if:

  1. they concern they same conduct, transaction, occurrence as the original complaint,
  2. The new party knew of the original action, and
  3. The new party also knew, but-for a mistake, she would have been named a defendant in the original case.

`

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Discovery Disclosure Requirements

FRCP

A

FRCP requires mandatory disclosure of information about the pending case to the opposing party.

There are three types of mandatory disclosures:
1. Initial Disclosures that supply info about disputed facts,
2. Expert Testimony: ID of expert, qualifications, written report.
3. Pretrial Disclosures: list of witnesses, documents, exhibits

NO MANDATORY DISCLOSURE IN CALIFORNIA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Scope of Discovery

FRCP & California

A

Relevant materials are discoverable even if not admissible so long as they are reasonably calculated to lead to discoverable evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Discovery of Privileged Materials

FRCP and California

A

Federal: privileged materials are not discoverable.
California: requires the responding party to object with particularity (ID the document, author, date, and recipients) and specify the applicable privilege.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Attorney Work Product Doctrine

General Rule

A

Work product, material produced in anticipation of litigation, is generally not discoverable unless there is a substantial need and an inability to obtain the information by another means.

17
Q

Absolute Privilege under Work Product Doctrine

FRCP, CA

A

Absolute privilege applies to mental impressions, opinions, conclusions, legal theory

FRCP: applies to things created by the party, the party’s attorney, another representative of the party

California: applies to things created by the party or her agent.

18
Q

What is a motion to dismiss for a failure to state a claim called in California courts?

A

General demurrer.

19
Q

Motion to Strike

A

Motion aimed at pleadings that contain immaterial or redundant issues.

20
Q

California’s Anti-SLAPP

A

Anti-SLAPP enables a party to make a motion to strike in suits that are brought to chil the valid exercise of the freedom of speech.

Effect of Anti-Slapp Motion: a party that makes a anti-slapp motion to strike shifts the burden on the plaintiff to show a probability of winning on the merits.

21
Q

California Demurrer

A

Used to respond to the complaint.

22
Q

General Demurrer

California Civil Procedure

A
  1. Pleading failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action
  2. Court lacks SMJ
23
Q

Special Demurrer

California Civil Procedure

A

Only allowed in cases classified as unlimited (>$25000)

  1. Uncertain pleading (motion for a more definite statement).
  2. Complaint unclear about theories of liability being asserted
  3. Lack of Legal capacity to sue
  4. existence of another case on the same cause of action
24
Q

Purposeful Availment & Foreseeability

(Minimum Contacts Standard)

A

A defendant’s contacts with the forum state must be assessed to determine if

  1. the defendant purposefully availed himself to the benefits and protection of the forum state,
  2. such that it is reasonably foreseeable that her activities would subject her to being haled into court there.
25
Q

Removal

+ Rule for Diversity Cases

A

Rule: removal allows a defendant to have a cause originally filed in state court to be remoced to federal court if the case could have been brought in either federal or state court.

  • Diversity Cases: defendant may not remove to federal court if he is a citizen of the forum state
  • Venue: a federal court in the state where the case was originally filed.