non fatal offences- assault Flashcards

to be guilty you need...booklet 7

1
Q

definition of assault

A

an act to cause the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful force or recklessness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

examples of what could be an assult

A

making a threat
pointing a gun
raising a fist
throwing a stone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what case gives a definition of assault

A

r v nelson
‘‘d has to do something of a physical kind which causes someone to apprehend they are about to be struck’’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

to be guilty d must have done the following (actus reus) (4)

A

an act
causes the victim to apprehend
immediate
unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

to be guilty d must have done the following (mens rea) (2)

A

intention OR recklessness to cause the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

an act- actions case

A

Logdon v DPP
(v thought fake gun was real and was terrified)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

an act- written words case

A

R v Constanza
(harassed colleague through written words)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

an act- silence case

A

R v Ireland
(silent phone calls)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

an act- indirect threats case

A

R v Dume
(released his dog towards a police officer and told him to “kill that man”. The dog bit the officer on the leg)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

an act- continuing acts case

A

Fagan V MPC
(accidentally drove onto a police officer’s foot, but on realising he had done so he refused to move the car)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

causing victim to apprehend- no fear means no assault case

A

R v Lamb
(both believed gun was fake)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

causes victim to apprehend- victim must fear actual force

A

Smith v CC of Woking
(stranger in garden)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

imminent definition

A

likely to happen soon but not immediate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

immediate- case that defines immediate
(case already learnt)

A

Smith v CC of Woking
defined ‘immediate’ as ‘imminent not instantaneous’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how does Tuberville v Savage contribute to the meaning of immediate

A

d put hand on sword and said he would take action if it wasn’t that time of day so d was not guilty as his words demonstrate his threat was not immediate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

unlawful force acts (2) and case (1)

A

Wilson v Pringle
Criminal Law Act s.3
s.117 Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE)

17
Q

mens rea- which case confirmed what

A

R v Cunningham confirmed the test for recklessness is subjective- d would need to foresee a risk of v’s fear meaning it depends on what d personally foresaw

18
Q

Wilson v Pringle

A

implied consent to the ‘‘ordinary jostlings of everyday life’’ (common, minor physical contacts that occur during routine interactions among people)

19
Q

Criminal Law Act s.3

A

application of force when self defense is needed is lawful

20
Q

s.117 Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE)

A

force can be used by police when making an arrest