Attachments - Interactions/Stages/Role of the Father Flashcards

1
Q

What is attachment?

A
  • an emotional bond between two people and this behaviour aims to maintain proximity/contact
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two main types of caregiver-infant interactions?

A
  • reciprocity
  • interactional synchrony
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is reciprocity?

A
  • an interaction is reciprocal when each person responds to the other and elicits a response from them
  • for example, when a mother smiles and the baby smiles back
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Brazelton (1979) argue?

A
  • basic rhythm of reciprocity is an important precursor to later communications
  • its regularity allows the caregiver to anticipate the infant’s behaviour/respond appropriately
  • the sensitivity to infant behaviour provides a foundation for after attachment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is interactional synchrony?

A
  • a special type of interaction between the caregiver and infant where they carry out the same action simultaneously
  • it is a reflection of what the other is doing (mother and infant reflect the actions/emotions of the other)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was Meltzoff and Moore’s (1977) study?

A
  • four different stimuli (3 facial expressions and 1 hand gesture) were used to observe the behaviour of infants
  • adult model displayed this and infants had a dummy in their mouth (during initial display)
    • dummy was removed and any reactions were observed/recorded
    • observer watched in real time, slow mo and frame by frame
    • it was then judged by independent observers who were asked to identify the model’s behaviours
  • behavioural categories:
    • mouth opening
    • termination of mouth opening
    • tongue protrusion
    • termination of tongue protrusion
  • ** inter-observer reliability scores were above 0.92 **
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the findings of Meltzoff and Moore’s study?

A
  • young infants imitated specific facial gestures (association)
  • in a later study, they demonstrated synchrony with young infants (innate behaviour)
    • Piaget (1962) cannot imitate intentionally
    • instead they pseudo-imitate because there is a reward
  • supporting study:
    • Murray and Trevarthen (1985) studied 2-month-old infants interacting with their mother in real time
    • when the mother was not responding, the infants showed acute distress
    • this shows that they are actively eliciting a response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why are the strengths/weaknesses of caregiver-infant interactions?

A
  • problems with testing infant behaviour:
    • difficult to test the reliability of their behaviour
    • infants mouths are in fairly constant motion
    • difficult to distinguish between general activity and specific imitated behaviours
  • failure to replicate:
    • Koepke et al (1985) failed to replicate the study’s findings
    • problems may be due to the procedure rather than the babies
  • intentional or imitative behaviour:
    • Abravenal and DeYoung (1991) found that infants showed little response when shown objects with diff. expressions
    • this shows that they do not just imitate what they see, it is in fact a social response
  • individual differences:
    • there is variation between infants behaviour
    • more strongly attached infant-caregiver pairs showed greater interactional synchrony
  • value of research:
    • studying this is important as it shows how infant interactions forms the basis for social development
    • babies associate their imitation with feeling and this leads to them understanding how others think/feel (Theory of Mind)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the stages of attachment?

A
  • stage one: pre-attachment (birth - 3 months)
    • 0 - 6 weeks = babies behave similarly to both human and inanimate objects
    • from six weeks, they become attracted to other humans
    • they are also happier in the presence of humans
  • stage 2: indiscriminate (3 - 6/7 months)
    • babies are more social
    • they recognise and prefer familiar adults
    • they do not show any separation protest or stranger anxiety
  • stage 3: discriminate (7/8 months)
    • by 7 months, infants show separation anxiety and show joy when reunited with a specific person
    • this is the primary attachment figure
    • they also show stranger anxiety
  • stage 4: multiple (9 months)
    • after the primary attachment is formed, multiple attachments are formed
    • Schaffer and Emerson found that within the first month of being attached, 30% of infants had multiple attachments to someone else
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Schaffer and Emerson’s (1964) study?

A
  • studied 60 babies from Glasgow and were visited in their homes every four weeks
  • overt observations and interviews were used/mothers kept a diary of her child’s behaviour
    • left alone in a room
    • left with other people
    • left in their pram outside house
    • left in their pram outside shops
    • left in cot at night
    • put down after being held by adult
    • passed by while sitting in cot/chair
  • mothers were asked to describe the intensity of any protest
    • behaviours that were studied were: separation protest/stranger anxiety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the findings of Schaffer and Emerson’s study?

A
  • 65% = first specific primary attachment was the mother
  • 30% = jointly attached to mother and another figure
  • 3% = attached to father
  • 27% = jointly attached to father/mother
  • most babies formed multiple attachments as soon as the first attachment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the strengths of development of attachments?

A
  • good external validity:
    • carried out in a natural environment
    • would not have shown demand characteristics
    • findings are applicable to everyday life
  • longitudinal design:
    • babies and their mothers were regularly followed up and observed
    • so it has a greater internal validity as there are no individual differences
  • no ethical issues:
    • consent was obtained from parents
    • confidentiality was maintained
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are multiple attachments?

A
  • Bowlby believed that attachments were hierarchal in nature with children having one primary attachment figure
  • then secondary attachments to others
  • rutter proposed the idea of multiple attachments were they are all of equal importance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the weaknesses of development of attachments?

A
  • methodological issues:
    • observations/self-report measures were used and both are prone to bias
    • mothers may have shown social desirability bias
  • biased sample:
    • only consisted of a working-class population
    • parental care has changed considerably since that time (e.g. more women go to work)
  • measuring multiple attachments:
    • babies may not have shown distress due to attachment but instead because their playmates have left them
    • there is a problem in defining the difference between an attachment figure and a playmate
  • conflicting evidence:
    • it is not clear on whether babies can form multiple attachments
    • research implies that they can only be formed when infants have formed a primary attachment
  • stage theories:
    • they suggest that development is inflexible (e.g. single attachments happen before multiple)
    • in other cultures forming multiple attachments may be the norm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the role of the father?

A
  • Grossman et al (2002) carried out a longitudinal study of babies’ attachments til teens
    • found that quality of baby’s attachment with mothers was related to later attachments (but not with fathers)
  • supports the idea that attachment with fathers is less important
  • however, he found that the quality of father’s play with babies was related to further attachments
  • ** fathers have a different role to mothers **
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Can fathers be primary attachment figures?

A
  • fathers tend to be the secondary attachment figure
  • however, they are able to take the role of a primary caregiver if they adopt the emotional role of the mother
  • Field (1978) studied 4 month old babies interactions with:
    • p.c. mothers
    • s.c. fathers
    • p.c. mothers
  • p.c. fathers spent more time smiling, imitating and holding their babies
  • this shows that fathers can also become primary attachment figures
16
Q

What are the strengths/weaknesses of the role of the father?

A
  • real-world application:
    • can be used to offer advice to parents
    • mothers and fathers may be forced to follow stereotypical roles
    • this can help to offer reassurance
  • confusion over research questions:
    • difficult to research as researchers are interested in diff. questions
  • children with single parent/no father:
    • studies by MacCallum and Golombok (2004) found that children brought up with only mothers/same sex couples do not develop differently to those with two heterosexual parents
    • suggest that role of father is not important
  • why fathers are generally not primary attachments:
    • due to traditional gender roles, women are expected to be more caring and nurturing
    • female hormones may create higher levels of nurturing
17
Q

What is imprinting?

A
  • when a new born baby attaches to the first living thing they see at birth
  • this happens very soon after birth within a specific time frame
18
Q

What is Lorenz’s study?

A
  • Lorenz split goose eggs into two batches
    • one half were hatched in an incubator (he was the first moving object they saw)
    • other half were hatched naturally
  • they were placed under an upturned box and their behaviour was observed when the box was removed
    • natural = went straight to mother
    • incubator = Lorenz (showed no bond with actual mother)
  • critical period = 4-25 hours
19
Q

What is sexual imprinting?

A
  • birds that imprinted on a human would later display courtship behaviour
  • imprinting is irreversible and long lasting
20
Q

What are the strengths/weaknesses of Lorenz’s study?

A
  • supporting studies:
    • Guiton (1966) showed that chicks who were exposed to yellow rubber gloves during their first few weeks imprinted on them
    • Lorenz found that peacocks who imprinted on tortoises
  • dispute over characteristics of imprinting:
    • it is now thought of a ‘plastic and forgiving mechanism’
    • can be reversed (e.g. spending times with more species)
  • problems with generalisation:
    • birds attachment system is different to mammalian attachment system
21
Q

What is Harlow’s (1959) study?

A
  • used rhesus monkeys to see if attachments are formed as explained by Learning Theory
  • newborn monkeys were individually put into different cages
    • wire mother with milk/soft mother no milk
    • wire mother no milk/soft mother with milk
    • wire mother with milk
    • soft mother with milk
  • monkeys preferred contact with the soft mother when frightened regardless of whether it produced milk
  • those with only a wire mother showed signs of distress
22
Q

What are the findings of Harlow’s study?

A
  • the monkeys had an innate, unlearned need for contact comfort
  • this indicated emotional security
23
Q

What are the strengths/weaknesses of Harlow’s research?

A
  • theoretical value:
    • has helped develop understanding of human-infant attachment
    • shows importance of quality of early relationships for later social development
  • practical value:
    • helped social workers understand risk factors in child neglect/abuse
    • important in the care of captive monkeys in zoos/breeding programmes
  • ethical issues:
    • caused lots of psychological and emotional harm
    • many monkeys also died
  • problems with generalisation:
    • human behaviour is governed by conscious decisions and we do not know how animals make their decisions
24
Q

What is the learning theory?

A
  • idea that all behaviour is learned rather than inborn
  • classical conditioning
  • operant conditioning
25
Q

What is classical conditioning?

A
  • learning through association
  • UCS = food
  • UCR = salvation
  • NS = bell (no response)
  • created an association between the bell and food
  • bell (CS) then elicits salvation (CR)
26
Q

What is operant conditioning?

A
  • learning through use of rewards
  • positive reinforcement = gaining pleasure
  • negative reinforcement = avoiding displeasure
    • behaviours that lead to a punishment are less likely to be repeated
  • babies cry for comfort (e.g. feeding)
  • if correct response is not provided baby cries again
    • two-way process as the caregiver receives negative reinforcement (stopping the crying)
27
Q

What is attachment as a secondary drive?

A
  • learning theory draws on the concept of drive reduction
  • hunger is a primary drive
    • motivated to eat to reduce hunger drive
  • person supplying food is associated with pleasure/removal of discomfort and becomes a secondary drive
28
Q

What are the strengths of the learning theory?

A
  • plausible theory:
    • explains one way in which attachments can be formed
    • most babies also form attachments with caregivers who feed them
  • newer learning theory:
    • social learning theory where infants observe and imitate the behaviours shown by their parents
    • it is based on a two-way interaction (reciprocity)
29
Q

What are the weaknesses of the learning theory?

A
  • based on animal studies:
    • behaviourists believed that humans are not much different from other animals
    • however, the formation of attachments is a complex process
  • attachment is not based on food:
    • Lorenz and Harlow’s studies showed that food was not the reason why animals form attachments
    • Schaffer and Emerson’s baby study showed that they did not form primary attachment with physical carer
  • ignores other factors:
    • it does not take into account things like interactional synchrony and reciprocity
    • best attachments are those were the caregiver is the most sensitive and easily picks up infant signals
30
Q

What is the monotropic theory?

A
  • Bowlby argued that although infants may form multiple attachments, they have one with special importance
  • this is the primary attachment figure
    • usually the mother but can be the person who responds most sensitively to the infant
31
Q

What are the features of the monotropic theory?

A
  • monotropy:
    • law of continuity = more constant/predictable care forms a better quality attachment
    • law of accumulated separation = effects of every separation from mother can add up
    • p.a.f. provides the main foundation for emotional development
  • social releasers:
    • babies are born with a set of innate ‘cute’ behaviours that encourages attention from adults
    • they elicit caregiving from the caregiver and form attachments through a reciprocal response
      ‎‎
  • critical period:
    • since attachment is innate, there is a limited window, which is the first two years of a child’s life
    • if it is not formed within this window, it would be difficult for the baby to form any further attachments
  • internal working model:
    • relationship with primary caregiver forms a mental representation of what future relationships will be like
    • it can generate expectations about what intimate, loving relationships are like
  • secure base:
    • attachment is important for protection and acts as a secure base
    • it can help foster independence
  • continuity hypothesis:
    • IWM means that there is consistency between early emotional experiences and later relationships
    • the view that there is a link between early attachment and later emotional behaviour
32
Q

What are the strengths of Bowlby’s monotropic theory?

A
  • animal research for imprinting/critical period:
    • Lorenz’s study on imprinting shows that it is innate
    • also found that if this did not take place within the critical period, they would be unable to imprint in the future
  • support for monotropy:
    • Tronick et al (1992) studied African tribe where babies were fed by other women but still show one primary attachment
  • support for social releasers:
    • Brazelton et al (1975) observed mothers and found that babies would be distressed when their mothers did not respond to their social releasers
    • shows that they are used to elicit a response
  • support for IWM:
    • Bailey (2007) assessed 99 mothers and found that those who reported poor attachment to their own parents were most likely to have children classified as ‘poor’
  • support for continuity hypothesis:
    • Minnesota longitudinal study found continuation between early attachment and later emotional/social behaviour
33
Q

What are the weaknesses of Bowlby’s monotropic theory?

A
  • counter evidence:
    • other attachments are seen as equally as important
    • e.g. fathers help with social development, siblings help with forming relationships with peers
    • Schaffer and Emerson’s study focussed on idea of multiple attachments
  • critical period:
    • Tizard and Hodges found that 21/22 children adopted at 4 formed a secure attachment by 8 years old
  • idea that poor first attachments cause difficulty forming healthy relationships:
    • individuals with difficult/insecure childhoods can go on to develop positive and secure relationships in adulthood
  • ignores role of father:
    • focuses on the role of the mother as the primary attachment figure and does not consider the father (seen as mainly economic)
  • temperament may be important as attachment:
    • this is the child’s genetically influenced personality
    • generally, happier babies encouraged more sensitive caregiving than moody babies