Memory Flashcards

1
Q

Memory

A

The process by which we retain information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Name the 3 types of long term memory

A

Procedural, Semantic and Episodic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How is information usually coded in long term memory?

A

Coded semantically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Semantic Memory

A

Factual knowledge an individual has learned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Episodic Memory

A

Personal experiences that are time stamped

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Procedural Memory

A

Memory store for our knowledge of how to do things, including our memories of learned skills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Give one similarity between episodic and semantic memory

A

Both declarative - they can be consciously recalled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

3 types of memory

A

Sensory memory, Short term memory and Long term memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sensory Memory

A

Initial contact for stimuli. SM is only capable of retraining information for a very short time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Short term Memory

A

The information we are currently aware of, or thinking about. It comes from paying attention to sensory memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Long term Memory

A

Information transferred from short-term memory into long-term storage in order to create enduring memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Duration of STM vs LTM

A

Up to 30 seconds unless its rehearsed or paid attention to

Can last from 2 minutes to 100 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rehearsal

A

Transferring information into long term memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Peterson and Peterson (1959)

A

-Participants given a nonsense syllable and asked to count down in threes or fours for 3-18 seconds
-after 3 seconds, 80% recalled correctly
-after 18 seconds, less than 10% recalled correctly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Coding

A

The process of converting information from one form to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Baddeley (1966) Method

A

Gave different lists of words to four groups of participants to remember. These were either acoustically similar or dissimilar, semantically similar or dissimilar.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Baddeley (1966) Results

A

Participants had problems recalling acoustically similar words when recalling immediately (from STM)

If recalling after an interval (from LTM) they had problems with semantically similar words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Baddeley (1966) Conclusion

A

LTM more likely to rely on semantic coding and the STM on acoustic coding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Baddeley Evaluation

A

Lacks ecological validity

Other types of LTM and other methods of coding that aren’t considered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Peterson and Peterson (1959) Evaluations

A

-Forgetting in STM can occur if information is not rehearsed
-Identified that duration of STM is approximately 18 seconds

-Artificial stimuli lacked personal meaning creating mundane realism, meaning we cannot generalise findings to different memory tasks
-Small sample size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Miller (1956)

A

noted that things come in sevens: 7 notes, 7 days etc. This suggests that the capacity of STM is 7 items (plus or minus 2).
-chunking: our capacity for remembering information can be increased if we chunk items together. We are more likely to remember things if we group them together.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Evaluation of Millers Chunking

A

Miller may have overestimated the capacity of the STM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

(Sperling’s investigation of the sensory register) Method

A

Participants were shown a grid with three rows of four letters for 50 milliseconds.

They had to immediately recall either the whole grid or a randomly chosen row indicated by the pitch of a tone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

(Sperling’s investigation of the sensory register) Results

A

When recalling the whole grid they only recalled an average of 4 or 5 letters.

When a particular row was indicated, an average of 3 items were recalled, no matter which row was selected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

(Sperling’s investigation of the sensory register) Conclusion

A

They did not know which row was to be selected, so we can assume that 3 items from any row could be recalled. Therefore the entire grid was in their sensory register.

They could not recall the whole grid because the trace faded before they could finish recall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

(Sperling’s investigation of the sensory register) Evaluation

A

Lab experiment was highly scientific but lacked ecological validity. People do not normally have to recall letters so it might not represent what would happen in the real world.

27
Q

Glanzer and Cuntiz

A

showed participants a list of 20 words, presented one at a time and then asked them to recall.
This is called the serial position effect: “When asking people to remember a list of words which is greater than the capacity of short term memory they have a tendency to remember words from the beginning and end of the listshowed participants a list of 20 words, presented one at a time and then asked them to recall.
This is called the serial position effect: “When asking people to remember a list of words which is greater than the capacity of short term memory they have a tendency to remember words from the beginning and end of the list”

27
Q

Multistore Memory of Memory

A

A theoretical framework that explains how information is processed and stored in our memory. It consists of three different memory stores: sensory memory, short-term memory, and long-term memory.

28
Q

Working Memory Model

A

Explains how we hold and manipulate information in the short term

28
Q

Central Executive

A

-Functions: direct attention to tasks, decides what working memory pays attention to
-manages the slave systems (phonological loop, visuo-spatial sketch pad, episodic buffer)

29
Q

Phonological Loop

A

-Limited capacity
-deals with auditory information and preserves order
-Baddeley 1986 further subdivided it into: phonological store (holds on to words heard) and Articulatory process (holds words heard/seen and silently repeated (looped) like an inner voice This is a kind of maintenance rehearsal)

29
Q

Visuo-spatial Sketch Pad

A

-Visual and/or spatial information stored here (inner eye)
-visual refers to what things look like and spatial refers to the relationships between things
-limited capacity
-Logie (1995) suggested subdivision: visuo-cache (store) and inner scribe for spatial relations

30
Q

Episodic Buffer

A

-Baddeley 2000 added episodic buffer as he realised model needed a more general store
-slave systems deal with specific types of information
-buffer extra storage system but with limited capacity
-integrates information from all other areas

31
Q

Baddeley and Hitch 1974

A

Believed memory is not just in one store, but in a number of different stores.

-only focused on STM
-LTM is a more passive store that holds previously learned material for use by the STM when needed

32
Q

(Evaluation of Working Memory Model) Clinical evidence

A

Shallice and Warrington 1970 supports the existence of a separate visual and acoustic store.

However, this was a case study so results cannot be generalised.

33
Q

(Evaluation of Working Memory Model) Evidence for the Episodic Buffer

A

Baddeley et al 1987
-Participants were shown words and then immediate recall
-Recall was much better for related words in sentences than unrelated words

Supports the idea of ‘general’ memory store that draws on LTM (semantics), for items that are neither visual nor phonological.

34
Q

(Evaluation of Working Memory Model) Studies of the word length effect support the phonological loop

A

Baddeley et al 1975 word length effect

-there is a finite space for rehearsal in the articulatory process
-WLE disappears if a person is given an articulatory suppression task

35
Q

Memory Decay

A

-memory traces decay over time
-during any delay a memory is subject to the effects of time and interference from other memories
-memories seem to be forgotten because we no longer have the appropriate reminders
-you are more likely to forget something that you did not pay attention to when it originally happened
-are more likely to forget or get mixed up with similar pieces of material

36
Q

Interference

A

One memory blocks another. This might result in forgetting on or the other or both.

37
Q

Proactive Interference

A

Forgetting occurs when older memories disrupt the recall of newer memories.

38
Q

Retroactive Interference

A

Forgetting occurs when newer memories disrupt the recall of older memories already stored.

39
Q

Method (Tulving and Psotka 1971 Forgetting in LTM)

A

Compared the theories of interference and cue-dependent forgetting.

Participants given either 1,2,3,4,5 or 6 lists of 24 words. Each list was divided into 6 categories of 4 words which were presented in category order.

FIRST CONDITION: participants had to recall all of the words in total free recall.

SECOND CONDITION: participants given all the category names and had to recall words from the list in free cued recall.

40
Q

Results (Tulving and Psotka 1971 Forgetting in LTM)

A

In total free recall condition, evidence of retroactive interference. Those with 1 or 2 lists had higher recall than those with more, suggesting that later lists interfered with the earlier lists.

In cued recall, the effects of retroactive interference disappeared. No matter how many lists, participants recalled about 70% of the words

41
Q

Conclusion (Tulving and Psotka 1971 Forgetting in LTM)

A

Suggests that interference had not caused forgetting because memories became available when a cue was used, showing that they were available, but inaccessible.

Forgetting shown in the total free recall was cue dependent forgetting.

42
Q

Evaluation (Tulving and Psotka 1971 Forgetting in LTM)

A

Lab experiment, low ecological validity.

Only tested memory of words, so results cannot be generalised to information of other types.

Highly controlled, lack of extraneous variables.

43
Q

Tulving 1983 (Retrieval Failure)

A

When we encode a new memory we also store info that occurred around it (cues). If we can’t recall it then the situation is not similar to that in which the memory originally occurred.

If the cues are not present when we come to recall then we find it difficult to retrieve the memory. It is not necessarily because we have forgotten it, it’s that we don’t have the cues to help us to access the memory. It is available, but there is a problem with accessing the memory.

44
Q

Types of cue dependent forgetting

A

-context: External environmental cues
-state: Internal cues

45
Q

Eye Witness Testimony

A

The ability of people to remember the details of past events which hey have observed.

46
Q

Misleading information

A

incorrect information given to the EW usually after the even

47
Q

Leading Question

A

A question that suggests a certain answer

48
Q

Post event discussion (PED)

A

occurs when there is more than one witness to an event. Witnesses may discuss what they have seen with other co-witnesses. This affects accuracy, as co-witness testimonies may contaminate each other’s testimonies. They may combine misinformation from other witnesses with their own memories. Research has demonstrated how this happens.

49
Q
A

Schemas are generalised, simplified representations of things based on our experience. Memory capacity can prevent us from remembering precise details about our everyday lives, but schemas allow us to overcome these limitations because we can summarise the regularities in our lives.
A problem with this is that we ma mistakenly recall events that never really happened, because they make sense within a particular schema.

50
Q

(Loftus and Palmer 1974) Experiment 1 Method and Results

A

Participants were shown a film of a multiple car crash. They were then asked a series of questions on how fast the cars hit each other (first condition), but using a different verb in the second condition (either smashed, collided, bumped or contacted).

Participants given ‘smashed’ estimated the highest speed, those given contacted gave the lowest.

51
Q

(Loftus and Palmer 1974) Conclusion

A

Leading questions can affect the accuracy of people’s memories of events.

52
Q

(Loftus and Palmer 1974) Evaluation

A

A
Implications for police interviews

artificial, watching a video is not as emotionally arousing as a real-life event so this may affect recall

a later study found that participants who thought they’d seen a real robbery could give an accurate description of the robber

demand characteristics (cues in the questions) reduce the validity and reliability in this experiment

53
Q

Why do we remember trauma?

A

The Amygdala

-Responsible for encoding and storing associations.
-released cortisol stress hormone, vivid and memorable
-Arc proteins in neurons strengthens the synapses, in hippocampus, emotionally arousing and repetition
-Genetic and environmental: how we react to trauma depending on genetic makeup or how we’ve been conditioned
-DID- Dissociation and Detachment

54
Q

Anxiety

A

-an unpleasant emotional state of fearing that something bad will happen
-happens in stressful situations
-tends to be accompanied with physiological arousal (increased heart rate and slow breathing)

55
Q

The Tunnel theory

A

An explanation for the weapon-focus effect is that the weapon narrows the field of attention and thus reduced the information to be stored

56
Q

Yerkes-Dodson Law 1908

A

Suggests EWT is very good when the person had medium anxiety levels

Suggests EWT is very poor when the person had low or high anxiety levels

(Basically Inverted U)

57
Q

The Cognitive Interview

A

w

A
The cognitive interview technique is a questioning technique used by the police to enhance retrieval of information from the witnesses’ memory.

Importance: Improving effectiveness of questioning witnesses in police interviews, Apply findings of psychological findings to this area.

Created by Fisher and Geiselman

58
Q

Outline Fisher and Geiselman 1992

A

Reviewed memory literature- people remember things better if they are provided with retrieval cues. The technique they devised had 4 components: Report everything, context reinstatement, recall from changed perspective and recall in reverse order

59
Q

4 components of Fisher and Geiselman 1992

A

-Report everything- every single detail, even trivial ones.
-Context reinstatement- Mentally reinstate the context of the target event. Recall scene, weather, thoughts and feelings, preceding events.
-Recall from changed perspective- Try to describe the episode as it would have been seen from different viewpoints, not just your own. Disrupts schema.
-Recall events in reverse order- different temporal orders, moving backwards and forwards in time.

60
Q

The enhanced cognitive interview

A

An amended version of the CI that seeks to build a trusting relationship between interviewer and witness and improve the quality of the communication between the two.
-The interviewer won’t distract e witness with unnecessary interruptions or questions
-The witness controlling the flow of information
-Asking open ended questions
-Getting them to speak slowly
-Reminding them not to guess and to say “I don’t know” when necessary
-Reducing anxiety in witnesses
Modified versions of this and the cognitive interview have been made, for example, with children.