Chapter 7: Joinder of Claims and Parties Flashcards

1
Q

When Joinder is Not Feasible (“Parties are “Indispensable”)

A

FRCP 19(b)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rule 19(b) “If a person who is required to be joined” - You have already determined that the party is required, and you have made that assessment. There are two choices:
1.
2.

A
  1. proceed among the existing parties or
  2. should be dismissed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Analysis Under Rule 19(b)
The court has already determined that a party or parties who are “__________” under Rule 19(a) cannot be joined due to the limitations of SMJ (adding them would destroy diversity) or venue, or due to a lack of PJ over the absent party.

A

necessary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

__________ helps determine whether the court should proceed with the suit in its piecemeal form or instead dismiss it in the expectation that there is another forum where joinder of necessary parties could be achieved.

A

Rule 19(b)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The four factors listed in Rule 19(b) are not totally exclusive of the factors in Rule 19(a), and there is some overlap among them. True or False.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

____________ action is when you don’t know who has a right to a property.

A

Interpleader

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

____________ ____________ meaning that you cannot sue me unless I give you permission.

A

sovereign immunity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Under Rule 19(b) determine ________ first and then ____________.

A

necessary
indispensable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Are they ___________? Are they _________? If they are _____________ the question is: can you proceed without them or must you dismiss it?

A

necessary
Indispensable
indispensable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The potential consequence of failing to join a necessary and Indispensable Party is _________ of the _________. This is a harsh remedy, but only if there really is no adequate alternative remedy or forum.

A

dismissal of the suit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Note that ______________ instruct the court to make its dismissal determination “in equity and good conscience.” Courts are not likely to favor dismissal when there is no alternate forum unless the interest being protected is particularly stoning.

A

Rule 19(b)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is intervention?

A

Injecting yourself into a case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Of right

A

you have to let me in the case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

permissive

A

you can let me in the case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

you have to let me in the case

A

of right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

you can let me in the case

A

permissive

17
Q

FRCP 24(a) refers to what?

A

legal interest

18
Q

2 kinds of intervention
1.
2.

A
  1. of right - the court MUST
  2. permissive - the court MAY
19
Q

Rule 24(b). In general. On TIMELY motion. Timeliness is not fixed. Rather it is evaluated under ____ factors.

A

4 factors

20
Q

In general. On TIMELY motion. Timeliness is not fixed. Rather it is evaluated under 4 factors. What rule?

A

Rule 24(b)

21
Q

Timeliness is not fixed. Rather it is evaluated under four factors:
1. The length of time during which the would-be inventor actually knew or reasonably should have known of its

A

Factor 1 Rule 24(b)

22
Q

Timeliness is not fixed. Rather it is evaluated under four factors:
2. The extent of the prejudice that the existing party to the litigation may suffer as a result of the would-be intervenor’s failure to apply for intervention as soon as it actually knew or reasonably should have known of its interest in the action;

A

Factor 2 Rule 24(b)

23
Q

Timeliness is not fixed. Rather it is evaluated under four factors:
3. The extent of the prejudice that the would-be intervenor may suffer if its petition for leave to intervene is denied; and

A

Factor 3 Rule 24(b)

24
Q

Timeliness is not fixed. Rather it is evaluated under four factors:
4. The existence of unusual circumstances militating either for or against a determination that the application is timely.

A

Factor 4 Rule 24(b)

25
Q

DO NOT confuse interpleader with impleader!

A

okay

26
Q

What is interpleader?

A

When someone who holds property seeks court intervention to determine the rightful owner.Wh

27
Q

When someone who holds property seeks court intervention to determine the rightful owner.

A

Interpleader

28
Q
A
29
Q
A