Chapter 5 & 6 - Profit Sharing Plans, Stock Bonus Plans, & Employee Stock Ownership Plans Flashcards
PSP contributions
Annual contributions are discretionary
must be substantial and recurring - 3 out of 5 or 5 out of 10 years
PSP employer stock
100% of assets can be in employer stock
PSP types
Profit sharing plan
Stock Bonus Plan
Employee stock ownership plan
401k plan
Contributory plans
401k
Thrift savings
Noncontributory plans
Profit sharing
Stock bonus
Employee stock ownership
PSP formulas
Standard allocation
Age based and benefits based
Social security integration
Standard allocation - PSP
fixed percentage of each employee’s compensation
Age based and benefits based - PSP
allocations are allowed
Social security integration - PSP
allowed
Excess method
PSP Advantage
Allocation Flexibility
Withdrawal flexibility
Contribution flexibility
PSP disadvantage
Unpredictable benefits
PSP vesting
Generally 2-6 yr graduated or 3 year cliff - can be faster but not longer
if plan requires 2 years of service must have 2 year cliff
401k safe harbor requires 100% immediate vesting
PSP employer contributions
Tax deductible
total of all employer contributions can’t exceed 25% of total employee compensation for the year
Total contributions and deferrals can’t exceed lesser of 100% of compensation or $66,000
Advantages of standard allocation method
Easy for employees to understand
Likely to be accepted as fair
Easy to implement because math is straightforward
Disadvantages of standard allocation method
At retirement total income replacement will be lower for owners and executives
If plan is established when owner is older the owner will struggle to accumulate enough plan assets to replace income
Permitted Disparity Method advantages
Increases profit sharing contribution for highly paid employees
Not viewed as discriminatory
Permitted Disparity Method Disadvantages
Harder to explain to employees why higher compensated colleagues get more
Not as easy to calculate
PSP Permitted Disparity calculation
All employees receive base contribution
Base contribution x $160,200
Excess contribution x ($330,000 - $160,200)
Total of both calculations is contribution
Advantages of Age Based Allocation
Shifts contributions toward older employees
Plan established by older owner allows them to accumulate funds quickly
not viewed as discriminatory
Disadvantages of Age Based Allocation
Younger employees may view as inequitable
Complex calculations to derive final contributions
Plan likely top heavy and will require 3% minimum contribution
Comparability plan
Employee classification scheme - owner group and employee group
must pass 1 of 2 minimum allocations
NHCE allocation is at least 1/3 of highest HCE allocation or
NHCE receives at least 5%