Romanian orphan studies Flashcards

1
Q

How many children were Romanian women required to have?

A

5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the aim of Rutter’s research?

A

To investigate the extent to which good care could make up for poor early experiences in institutions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was Rutter’s procedure?

A
  • Followed a group of 165 Romanian orphans as part of the ERA study.
  • They had been adopted by English families.
  • Physical, cognitive and emotional development was assessed at ages 4, 6, 11, 15 and 22-25 years.
  • The control group was made up of 52 children from the UK adopted around the same time.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many adoptees showed signs of delayed intellectual development?

A

1/2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did the adoptees show at age 11?

A

They showed differential rates of recovery that was related to their age of adoption.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the mean IQ of the children adopted before 6 months?

A

102

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the mean IQ of the children adopted between 6 months and 2 years?

A

86

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the mean IQ of the children adopted after 2 years?

A

77

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the procedure of Zeanah’s research?

A
  • Assessed attachment in 95 Romanian children aged 12-31 months.
  • Were compared to a control group of 50 children who had never lived in an institution.
  • Attachment type was assessed using the strange situation.
  • Carers were also asked about unusual social behaviour.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the 4 findings of Zeanah’s research?

A
  • 74% of the control group were securely attached, however 19% of the institutional group was securely attached.
  • 44% of institutionalised children had disinhibited attachments as oppose to less than 20% of the control group.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Rutter’s reasoning for a disinhibted attachment?

A

It is developed as an adaptation to living with multiple caregivers during the critical period of attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the behaviours associated with a disinhibited attachment?

A

Equally friendly and affectionate towards familiar people and strangers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the 2 issues with development?

A
  • Lack of intellectual development
  • Lack of emotional development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Strength - Real world application

A
  • Can improve the conditions for children growing up outside of a family home.
  • Has helped psychologists understand the effects of early institutional care.
  • E.g = care homes now avoid having large amounts of caregivers for the children.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strength - Fewer confounding variables

A
  • Many children studied had experienced varying degrees of trauma, and it is difficult to disentangle the effects of neglect from those in institutional care.
  • Therefore the results were less likely to be confounded by other negative early experiences.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Limitation - Lack of adult data

A
  • We don’t have data to answer some of the questions about the long-term effects of insitutional care.
  • This includes questions about the development of mental health and forming adult relationships.