ethology and aggression Flashcards

1
Q

2 reasons why is aggression beneficial to survival

A
  1. it reduces competition
  2. establishes dominance hierarchies and these are vital to allow access to resources such as females
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

support of aggression establishing dominance hierarchies

A

Pettit et al observed how aggression in children at play led to dominance hierarchies - this is adaptive because dominance over others brings benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ritualistic aggression - Lorenz

A

Lorenz proposed that aggression in animals is often ritualistic, which he argued is more adaptive than direct aggression, as symbolic aggression would help ensure that organism was not harmed.
if the organism sustained an injury this could impair their ability to reproduce or even result in death.
So ritualistic aggression such as ‘teeth bearing’ would have the effect of deterring an opponent without causing physical harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is an innate releasing mechanism

A

an inbuilt physiological process.
A Key Stimulus triggers/activates the innate releasing mechanism which produces the Fixed Action Pattern

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is a Fixed Action Pattern

A

FAP is a pattern of instinctive behaviours triggered by an IRM.
They are a sequence of actions that respond to a stressor or cue (Stimulus). FAP’s are innate and must be performed to their fullest extent, even when the stimulus is no longer present. Cannot be altered before it is completed. Found in every individual of a species (universal)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Lea three features of FAPs

A
  1. universal - all the animals in that species use the same type of threat.
  2. Innate - all the animals in that species seem to be born with it and dont have to learn it
  3. Ballistic - once it starts it cannot
    be stopped
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Key study for IRMs and FAPs:
Tinbergen - The Stickleback study

A

Tinbergen - The Stickleback study:
- Tinbergen presented male sticklebacks with a series of wooden models of different shapes.
The red on the competing males’ underbelly is the stimulus that triggers the IRM that, in turn, leads to aggressive FAP.
He found that if the model had a red underside, the stickleback would aggressively attack it, but no red meant no aggression.
Once triggered, the FAP always ran its course to completion without any further stimulus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

research showing a limitation of ethological explanation

A

Mead - studied three tribes in Papa New Guinea for 6 months. Found the Mundugamor tribe were aggressive excannibals. But the Arapesh tribe were gentle and no aggression found.
Proves aggression is not innate as both tribes would have both been aggressive, not one aggressive and one non aggressive.
Shows that environmental influences like culture affect aggression.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Research showing limitation of ethological explanation - NIsbett

A

Nisbett:
Found that in a lab experiment when South American white males were insulted they were more likely to respond aggressively than white North American males under the same conditions.

problem for ethological explanation of aggression because it demonstrates cultural differences that would be problematic for the ethological explanation to account for as there was a high variation in aggressive responses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Limitation animal study to show aggression is not always ritualistic - Goodall

A

Goodall studied chimpanzee behaviour for over 50 years. SHe observed groups of chimpanzees that slaughtered all members of the other groups. Goodall referred to this as gang behaviour as the systematic slaughtering of one group by another group. This aggression is hard to explain by an ethological explanation as the risk of injury to the attacking group is high and thus does not appear to be adaptive behaviour. - not a harmless ritualistic aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly