US supreme court Flashcards

1
Q

presidential selection of a nominee

A

aim to appoint those who share their view of how constitution should be interpreted e.g. Trump promised to choose nominees from cons legal group Federalist Society suggestions

background FBI check e.g. Anthony Kennedy 1988 iterviewed for over 10 hours- sexual history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

senate judiciary committee

A

interviewed in televised hearing, then SJC votes
only rec but fortells result e.g. RBG unnanimous committee vote, then 96-3 in senate
if committee partisan, senate probably is e.g. Clarence Thomas 7-7 SJC, 52-48 senate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

senate confirmation

A

simple majority
used to be 60 votes for cloture but 2013 nuclear option which allowed cloture w simple maj
means now justices can be confirmed if one party have maj, allowing more controversial candidates
e.g. 2020 Amy C-B first SCJ not to get single minority vote in 150 yrs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

merrick garland

A

2016
Rs held senate and said they wouldn’t consider in hearings him due to upcoming Nov election
Ds said it was unprecedented and president should still be able to nominate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Amy Coney Barrett

A

2020
R eager to take advantage of majority
Trump wanted her confirmed to rule in his favour if he appealed electoin result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Clarence Thomas

A

1991
accusations of sexual harassment from former colleague Anita Hill
confirmed by senate partisan vote- only 11 D supported

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Brett Kavanaugh

A

2018
denied allegations of sexual misconduct
important significane- nominated by Trump to replace swing Kennedy
only 1 D for and 1 R against

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

arguments for appointment process effective

A
  1. detailed scrutiny (FBI, SJC)- opps for unsuitable candidates withdrawn
  2. independent once appointed and may follow unexpected approach
  3. both pres and senate involved: 2 elected branches oversee. important for democracy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

judges independent once appointed

A

life terms and not influenced by president
e.g. R George Bush appointed David Souter 1990- became unexpectedly liberal member of SC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

arguments against appointment process effective

A
  1. pres choose nominees who support their philosophy
  2. political decision making violates president’s right to appoint e.g. Garland
  3. increased partisanship = not assessing nominees actual qualities e.g. Kavanaugh, Amy CB
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

balance of the Supreme Court

A

Kennedy former swing vote - cons gun control but maj opinion for Obergefell v Hodges. replaced by Kavanaugh (cons) e.g. Rucho v Common Clause 2019- rule partisan gerrymandering constitutional.

still regular unanimity e.g. 2018-19 under 50% of 5-4 decisions were partisan- legal side more important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

diversity of Supreme Court

A

only 6 women ever sat on court, but 4 currently- Sotomayor, Kagan, Coney Barrett, Brown Jackson
3 African Americans
1 hispanic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

strict constructionism

A

interpreted literally- only updated formally
e.g Scalia (Reagan)- “it means today what ut meant when it was adopted”
R presidents e.g. Trump- Gorusch, Kavanaugh
most originalists are R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

loose constructionism

A

interpreted loosly and applied to modern text
needs to change to society’s needs
D presidents e.g. Stephen Breyer (clinton) “interpreted in light of our whole experience”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Supreme Court as protector of rights

A

2014 Burwell v Hobby Lobby Stores- struck down part of ACA that made family run businesses contribute to health insurance that may be used for contraceptives. (protect 1st amendemnt freedom of religion)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

controversial rulings

A

politically significant changes
e.g. Bush v Gore 2000- recount of Florida’s votes within the timeframe was unconstitutional

17
Q

quasi-legislative body

A

through its decisions, SCJ creates new rights for Americans and moves beyond interpretive role?
‘legislating from the bench’
effectively making new law

18
Q

judicial restraint

A

conservative judges claim judicial restraint.
tend to rule in line with precedent and therefore rarely unconstitutional

19
Q

federalism

A

has made decisions overruling state laws e.g. Obergefell v Hodges

19
Q

judicial activism

A

liberal judges- likely to strike down to improve society
e.g. Brown V Topeka

20
Q

Brown v Board of Education

A

1954
“separate but equal” clause legitimised idea of racial inferiority
SC ruled this violted 14th amendment “equal protection”- key victory for growing civil rights movement

21
Q

Obergefell v Hodges

A

2015
Obergefell married husband in Maryland but Ohio didnt recognise
5-4 ruling that right to marry was fundamental by 14 amendment.
fundamental change by unelected body

22
Q

Roe v Wade

A

1973
Roe challenged right of Texan law to deny abortion, 7-2 maj
‘right to privacy’- due process clause in 14th and 15th amendments