Topic 1 Flashcards

Functionalists, strain and subcultural theories.

1
Q

What do functionalists say about crime?

A

Functionalists believe that crime is inevitable in society; poor socialisation and inequality result in the absence of norms and values being taught. Also, functionalists believe crime is positive for society because it allows boundary maintenance, and allows a scope for adaption and change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does Durkheim say about crime?

A

‘Crime is normal… an integral part of all healthy societies.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How does Durkheim believe crime is caused?

A

Believes it is caused by not everyone being equally and effectively socialised into the shared norms and values, so some individuals will be prone to deviate. Also there is a diversity of lifestyles and values meaning that different groups may have their own norms about what they deem as deviant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does Durkheim say about modern societies?

A

Modern societies tend towards anomie or normlessness - the rules governing behaviour become weaker and less clear-cut. Modern societies have a complex division of labour, meaning individuals are different from one another weakening the collective conscience and results in higher levels of deviance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are Durkheim’s two positive functions of crime?

A
  1. Boundary maintenance.
  2. Adaptation and change.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is boundary maintenance?

A

The concept that when people are punished for committing crimes, it teaches the rest of society not to go against norms and values, in turn strengthening boundaries and preventing further crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is adaptation and change?

A

Adaptation and change is the concept that deviant behaviours demonstrate a changing attitude of the population to the established way of doing things. At first by someone challenging norms, they will be seen as deviant but however in the long run their values may give rise to a new culture and morality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who supports Durkheim’s view that crime can be positive?

A

Davie. He suggests that prostitution is positive because it allows men to express sexual frustration without threatening the nuclear family. Argues it acts as a safety valve.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are criticisms of Durkheim’s view?

A

Durkheim offers little explanation as to why crime occurs other than frustrations.
In contemporary society, deviant behaviours have less effect than previous examples. For example, the Black Lives Matter protests in the USA haven’t led to widespread change.
It is difficult to measure the ‘optimal amount’ of crime that can exist in a society.
Crime doesn’t exist for social solidarity.
Functionalism ignores individual difference, as it regards society as a whole, we do not know the impact it has on individuals.
Crime can actually create isolation instead of solidarity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does Merton believe about crime?

A

Believes crime and deviance were a product of dysfunction in society. Suggested that society was structurally unequal and that the inability of some members to achieve the ‘American Dream’ led to a strain to anomie.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does Merton mean by a strain to anomie?

A

The resulting strain between the cultural goal of money success and the lack of legitimate opportunities to achieve it produces frustration, and this in turn creates a pressure to resort to illegitimate means such as crime and deviance. The strain to anomie is the pressure to deviate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are Merton’s 5 deviant adaptations to strain?

A
  1. Conformity.
  2. Innovation.
  3. Ritualism.
  4. Retreatism.
  5. Rebellion.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is conformity?

A

Individuals chase the American Dream and work hard, accept social goals and pursue them from legitimate means.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is innovation?

A

Individuals accept the goal of money success but use ‘new’, illegitimate means such as theft or fraud to achieve it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is ritualism?

A

Individuals have accepted they were unlikely to achieve goals of wealth, conformed to the norms and values of society, adopted legitimate means despite knowing it wouldn’t lead to their goals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is retreatism?

A

Individuals reject both the goals and the legitimate means and become dropouts. Merton uses alcohol and drug addicts as examples.

17
Q

What is rebellion?

A

Individuals challenge the socially-approved goals, rejected the legitimate means of achieving these goals and would look to adopt alternative methods of achieving their vision of society.

18
Q

How does Merton explain the patterns shown in official crime statistics?

A

Most crime is property crime, because American society values material wealth so highly.
Lower-class crime rates are higher, because they have least opportunity to obtain wealth legitimately.

19
Q

What is a strength of Merton’s argument?

A

He recognized the role of structural inequality in crime and highlighted the lack of opportunities available to some groups - links to Cohen.

20
Q

What are criticisms of Merton?

A

He takes official crime statistics at face value. These over-represent working-class crime meaning that Merton sees crime as a mainly working-class phenomenon. Too deterministic, the working-class experience the most strain yet they don’t all deviate.
Marxists argue that it ignores the power of the ruling class to make and enforce the laws in ways that criminalise the poor not the rich.
Also it assumes that there is a ‘value consensus’ - that everyone strives for ‘money success’ and he ignores the possibility that many may not share this goal.

21
Q

How does Cohen agree with Merton?

A

He agrees that deviance is largely a lower-class phenomenon. It results from the inability of those in the lower classes to achieve mainstream success goals by legitimate means such as educational achievement.

22
Q

How does Cohen criticise Merton?

A

Merton sees deviance as an individual response to strain, ignoring the fact that much deviance in committed in or by groups, especially among the young.
Merton focuses on utilitarian crime committed for material gain, such as theft or fraud. He largely ignored crimes such as assault and vandalism, which may have no economic motive.

23
Q

What did Cohen do and what did he find?

A

He examine young males from low income backgrounds in the USA and in the 1950s. As a response to educational failure and inability to achieve status through legitimate means these males suffered from status frustration. As a response they turned to subcultural groups in order to obtain status from their peers.

24
Q

What is a strength of Cohen’s argument?

A

Offers an explanation of non-uti;Italian deviance. Unlike Merton, whose concept of innovation only accounts for crime with a profit motive, Cohen’s idea of status frustration helps to explain non-economic delinquency.

25
Q

What are criticisms of Cohen’s argument?

A

Cohen assumes that working-class boys start of sharing middle-class success goals, only to reject these when they fail.

26
Q

What alternative argument does Matza suggest?

A

Matza suggests that most young people drift in and out of deviant behaviours as they are unable to control subterranean values - lack of control in teenage years, younger people drift in and out of delinquency before setting on a path that conforms to society’s norms.

27
Q

How is Cloward and Ohlin’s argument similar to Merton’s?

A

They suggested that young working-class youths were more likely to react to blocked opportunities for money success in society.

28
Q

What else do Cloward and Ohlin argue?

A

They suggested that there was a greater diversity of subcultural responses and these were based upon the characteristics of their local area, depending on the area young working-class youths lived in, they had different opportunities to commit crime.

29
Q

What are Cloward and Ohlin’s three types of deviant subcultures?

A
  1. Criminal subcultures.
  2. Conflict subcultures.
  3. Retreatist subcultures.
30
Q

Criminal subcultures…

A

Based in areas where there was an existing structure of criminal behaviour. Allows the young to associate with adult criminals, who can select those with the right abilities and provide them with training as well as opportunities for employment on the criminal career ladder.

31
Q

Conflict subcultures…

A

Most likely to develop in areas of transition where social organisation was lower and had less social cohesion. There is no stable professional criminal network so only allows for loosely organised gangs. Violence allows the youth to release frustration at blocked opportunities as well as an alternative source of status by winning territory from rival gangs.

32
Q

Retreatist subcultures…

A

Can occur in any neighbourhood, youths have retreated from social integration. They don’t aspire to be a professional criminal, they turn to substance abuse.

33
Q

How does South criticise Cloward and Ohlin?

A

South argues that the definitions of conflict and criminal subcultures can become blurred in modern society particularly in the drugs and counterfeit goods trade.

34
Q

What are other criticisms of Cloward and Ohlin?

A

They ignore the wider power structure, including who makes and enforces the law.
They over-predict the amount of working-class crime.