Duty to protect against 3rd persons Flashcards

1
Q

The duty owed to protect against the actions of 3rd parties hinges on what concept?

A

The duty to control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What duties are owed by an actor in a special relationship with another?

A

The duty of reasonable care with regard to risks that arise within the scope of the relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What affects whether a relationship is deemed to be special?

A

The decision is based on principle or policy, usually due to the defendant’s ability to control the environment, to protect and prevent the risk, and the plaintiff’s reasonable dependency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When does a duty to protect from a 3rd person exist?

A

Several cases have found the duty to protect only (1) when there was a special relationship, and (2) when the risk was known or foreseeable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When have courts imposed liability for store owners to protect their clients from the actions of 3rd parties?

A

when attacks by third persons were foreseeable and the business failed to take reasonable steps to protect those on its premises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The specific harm rule for the duty of store owners

A

A landowner doesn’t owe a duty to protect from violent 3rd parties unless they are aware of specific imminent harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The prior similar incidents test for the duty of store owners

A

Foreseeability is established by evidence of previous crimes on or near the premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The Totality of the circumstances test for the duty of store owners

A

Takes additional factors into account such as the nature, condition, and location of the land as well as any other relevant factual circumstances bearing on foreseeability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The balancing test for the duty of store owners

A

Balances the foreseeability of harm against the burden of imposing the duty to protect against 3rd parties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How is the issue of foreseeability dealt with by courts when dealing with the duty of stores to protect patrons against 3rd parties?

A

Holistically, considering a number of factors such as the existence of prior criminal acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Immunity of teachers

A

Teachers and administrators at schools that accept federal funds are immune from liability for acts and omissions that cause harm when acting on behalf of the school.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Child abuse reporting statutes

A

Every state has one but not all provide a private right of action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Liability for student on student violence

A

Many courts have held that school officials are liable, especially when there has been notice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Time and space considerations for the duty of schools

A

Harms suffered off of school grounds and after school has ended are not covered because the school has no supervisory role and the students are out of the school’s control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The standard of care LL’s owe tenants

A

The standard that was in place at the time the plaintiff became a resident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The affirmative duties of LLs

A

A duty of reasonable care in all areas under there control

17
Q

What is the LL’s duty to protect from 3rd parties under the common law?

A

There is no duty to protect from criminal acts of 3rd persons under the common law