Week 2 Lecture Flashcards

1
Q

The consumer decision process

A
  1. Problem recognition
  2. Information search
  3. Evaluation of alternatives
  4. Product choice/purchase decision
  5. Outcomes/post-purchase behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cognitive dissonance

A

buyer’s remorse
can be reduced when marketers engage (send thank you notes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  1. Problem recognition
A

Occurs when a customer sees a significant difference between their current state and a desired state/ideal state –> there is some type of tension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

2 types of problem recognition

A

Opportunity recognition: ideal state moves upward (when you want a new car)
Need recognition: actual state moves downward (when you run out of gas)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. Information search
A

identify possible solutions to our problem (surf the web)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

(Info search) Reduces risks of decision-making

A
  1. Financial –> lose money
  2. Functional –> alternatives that solve the problem
  3. Physical –> harm
  4. Social –> social status
  5. Psychological –>self-esteem, confidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Categorization of information search

A
  1. Prepurchase vs Ongoing search
    Prepurchase –> consumers recognise a need and search the marketplace for specific info
    Ongoing search –> browsing for fun (intrinsic enjoyment of the search process) or staying up to date on what’s happening in the market
  2. Internal vs External search
    Internal search –> scanning our own mind for info about product alternatives (past experience, knowledge)
    External search –> obtaining product info from the environment (ads, friends, consumer reports)
  3. Deliberate vs Accidental search
    Deliberate search –> our knowledge may be result of directed learning (when you bought a birthday cake last month, you will probably know where to buy the best one)
    Accidental search –> when info is acquired in a more passive manner
    E.g. mere exposure to ads, packaging, sales promotion (creates an association with products)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Brand switching

A

Changing brands even if the current brand satisfied the customer’s needs
When in a good mood or little stimulation elsewhere (sensory-specific satiety)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sensory-specific Satiety

A

a cause of variety seeking when there is relatively little stimulation in the environment of a consumer
and/or desire to choose new alternatives over familiar ones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How many info is searched for?

A

When it involves an important purchase
When there is a need to learn about the purchase
When info is easily obtained
Depends on prior knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When do we stop searching?

A

We continue to search until the costs exceed the utility of information search (as long as the process is not too time-consuming)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  1. Evaluation of alternatives
A

important to understand product categorization
(comparing several models)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evaluation of alternatives: Product categorization

A

Evoked set –> products already in memory
products are comparable to each other (they belong to the same product category; different types of cola)

Consideration set (part of the evoked set) –> the products that are considered for purchase

The success of brands depends on whether they belong to the evoked set of consumers (position the brand in a way that a consumer is able to add the brand to the evoked set)
Products in the evoked set share similar features
When faced with a new product, consumers refer to already existing knowledge in familiar product categories to form new knowledge
Important to understand how knowledge is represented in the consumer’s cognitive structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Product positioning

A

The way a product is grouped with other products has implications of who the competitors are and on what criteria consumers make their choice

Product positioning –> success depends on convincing the consumer that the product should be considered in the category
Example: the orange juice industry repositioned orange juice as a drink that could be enjoyed all day, not just as a breakfast drink

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Levels of set elements

A
  1. Superordinate level (cola)
  2. Basic level (diet cola vs non-diet cola)
  3. Subordinate level (diet cola vs diet pepsi; cola zero vs pepsi vs coca cola)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Experiment - Dijksterhuis, Bos, van Baarden (2006)
On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect

A

What is the best car to buy?
Each car with 4 characteristics
2 groups of participants –> not thinking (distracted by other task); thinking

Results:
Simple decision: enhanced by unconscious thought
Complex decision: enhanced by unconscious thought

Explanation:
Conscious thinking –> limited capacity
decision making requires cognitive resources
Unconscious thinking –> no limited capacity
decision making requires no cognitive resources

Conclusion: sometimes it pays not to think hard about a complex problem

17
Q

Deliberation-without-attention hypothesis

A

Conscious thinking leads to good choices when it concerns simple choices
But its limited capacity has the consequence that is not efficient when it concerns complex choices

18
Q

Experiment 2
Surveying shoppers buying simple and complex products

A

Method: surveying shoppers emerging from Ikea and Bijenkorf (sells simple products like clothing
Conscious vs Unconscious thinkers

Results: unconscious thinkers were most satisfied with their IKEA purchase; conscious shoppers were most satisfied with their Bijenkorf purchase

Conclusion: choose your socks carefully but don’t sweat the details about the couch

19
Q

Dijksterhuis (2006) has 4 predictions

A
  1. Decisions after unconscious thought are better than after conscious thought
  2. Quality of unconscious decisions increases with the duration of unconscious thought
  3. Unconscious thought is superior, even with real-life decision problems
  4. Unconscious thought is associated with an optimal decision strategy: weighting strategy