Social Influence- Minority Influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Minority influence

A

Requests individuals to reject majority behaviours/belief, and be converted to the views of a minority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does the minority attempt to do?

A

change views through informative social influence, so this is likely to result in internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Changing views through informative social influence, likely results in what?

A

Internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What starts as a slow process?

A

Minorities changing majority opinions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does the process change from a slow process to a quicker process -of minorities changing majority opinions?

A

As more of a majority convert to the new view the process speeds up in a process called the snowball effect.
And the minority view improves its acceptability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the name of the process called when more a majority converts to the new view?

A

Snowball effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How many behaviours are there?

A

3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the 3 behaviours ?

A

Behaviour 1: Consistency
Behaviour 2: Commitment
Behaviour 3: Flexibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Behaviour 1: Consistency

A

The minority needs to demonstrate it is confident in its view if they repeat some messages over time (diachronic consistency) - the argument seems more powerful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In which behaviour does this occur and what is it called when the same message is repeated over time expressing confidence ?

A

Behaviour 1: Consistency
Diachronic consistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Behaviour 2: Commitment

A

If the minority are willing to suffer for their views but still hold them, this is likely to cause members of the majority to take them seriously.

This is known augmentation principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is it called if the minority are willing to suffer for their views but still hold them, this is likely to cause members of the majority to take them seriously?

A

Augmentation principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define the augmentation principle.

A

The minority are willing to suffer for their views but still hold them, and this likely causes members of the majority to take them seriously

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Behaviour 3: Flexibility

A

If seen as dogmatic, minorities will not be persuasive, they need the ability to appear to consider valid counter arguments, and slightly compromise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Between what factors is there a balance needed?

A

Flexibility and consistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why is there a balance needed?

A

To seem reasonable, open-minded as well as having a clear stable opinion there needs to be a balance.

17
Q

Evaluative studies

A

Moscovici (1969)
Nemeth (1986)

18
Q

Moscovici
1969

A

Commitment:
-Group of 4 Ps and 2 Confederates were shown 36 blue slides of different shades in 2 conditions

-in the first a consistent minority stated that every slide was green
-32% if Ps gave the same answer as the minority on at least 1 trial w/ wrong answers given by Ps on 8.4% of trials
-compared to only 1.25% when the minority was inconsistent

=AS 68% of Ps never agreed w/ the minority, perhaps only some people are receptive to minority groups

19
Q

Nemeth (1986)

A

Flexibility:
-used groups of 3 Ps + 1 confederate
-in 2 conditions
-in 1st condition, fed (minority) would show inflexibility by arguing for a low level of compensation for the victim of an imaginary ski flit accident and not changing from that level

-in 2nd condition, fed showed flexibility by raising his offer slightly. In this flexible condition, the majority was much more likely to lower their compensation level close to the fed than the inflexible condition

20
Q

Critical evaluation for Nemeth (1986)

A

-as it was an experimental situation w/ the Ps aware of the ski lift vicim was not real, and no money would be paid, we may question the external validity of this experiment

21
Q

More evlauation
Give real life examples of time when minorities have cause soical change due to minoirty influence

A

Gay rights movemement
Environmental groups
Suffragettes
AND ON THE RIGHT OF POLITICS UKIP

these groups have been :
-consistent in message
-and in some cases suffered

eventually leading to the social change they aimed for