Enforcement of Contractual Rights/Problems, Discharge of Contract Flashcards

1
Q

unenforceable contract (3)

A

statutes of frauds
sales of goods act
illegality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Enforceable contract - Requirement of Writing
jurisdiction vs common law vs statutory

A

Some contracts in jurisdictions must be in writing to be enforceable
in common law no contracts have to be in writing
for statutory contacts they need to be in writing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Statutes of Fraud purpose
and where it is effect in Canada

A

ensure fraud was not perpetrated through lack of sufficient writing in contracts, less lying, liars cannot win cases

everywhere except BC and MB

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Statute of Fraud indicated that certain types of contacts are not unenforceable because they are not in writing. List 4-6 examples

A
  1. Promise to answer for damages out of estate
  2. Guarantee of debt of another without indemnification
  3. Agreement made in consideration of marriage
  4. Agreement concerning land
  5. Agreement not performed for one year
  6. Ratification of infants/minority contract
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. What does writing mean? - if contract falls within scope of statute of fraud there must be?
  2. What is it?
A
  1. Memorandum
  2. written record in existence containing critical essential terms of the contract
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does writing mean? - Critical/Essential Terms of the contract and which party signs incase of suing

A

identity of parties, subject of consideration, possession date, signed by parties.
only party to be sued needs to have signed it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does writing mean? - What if contract falls within scope of statute of fraud and there is no memoradndum (3)

A

contract rendered unenforceable by statute/court
neither party gets a remedy
Court won’t help with parties pre relationship or transfer of goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Courts Method to limit statute of fraud - Doctrine of part performance

A

enforces contracts concerning land if plaintiff, suffering loss, can show they initiated performance of contract with reliance on it, courts accept in lieu of memorandum

Act of performance can suggest existence of contract, deposit not enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sales of Goods Act and regards to illegality and courts

A

Sales of chattels in Manitoba over 50$ and Receipt is sufficient. With regards to illegality, can affect property relationships but courts won’t get involved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

1.Doctrine of Substantial Performance 2. goal

A

performance that is not technically complete may still be legally sufficient—assuming that the defects are not “material” to the agreement

Equity attempt to limit unfair potential of the statutes of fraud as liars (part performance) victorious in courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how courts review contracts to avoid bias towards enforceability: Literal plain, strict approach

A

restricts interpreting to dictionary, but can have more than one dictating certainty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how courts review contracts to avoid bias towards enforceability: Liberal Approach

A

looks to intent of parties in drafting the agreement, Stresses circumstances around contract, negotiation, knowledge of parties (context)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Parol Evidence rules (3)

A
  • rule of evidence
  • create certainty in contracts
  • submit element to fact finder to consider
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Where there is a situation of bargaining or negotiation where parties have to put in a final form of agreement, parol evidence states

A

a term previously agreed upon by the parties but not included in the final written form of contract will not later be permitted to add to or contradict the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does “parol” mean in the contract context

A

extrinsic (not part of) to or outside the written agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Parol Evidence Rules apply to two things and describe what they reduce to

A

oral agreement which reduce to writing
and written agreement reduced to formal document under seal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Parol Evidence rules operates to exclude (2)

A

information not found in the written agreement or a party that claims should be added

18
Q

Exceptions to Parol Evidence rules:
It doesn’t (4)

A
  1. apply if party can show written contract was never to embody all its terms
  2. evidence of amending agreements reached subsequent of written agreement
  3. exclude collateral agreements
  4. exclude condition precedence
19
Q

Contra Preferentum

A

courts read the contract against interest of party that created it, if two interpretations possible

20
Q

Judicial Notice

A

Some things in a contract doesn’t have to be proven

21
Q

Agreements to Agreement are _______ so contract is ______

what clause can save the contract

A

uncertain so contract is void
arbitrator clause can save contract

22
Q

Contract incompleteness

A

failure to include data in which contract begins so agreement fails

23
Q

Implied terms in interpreting contract (2)

A
  1. statutory implied terms
  2. Common law implied terms
24
Q

What is an implied term and what is it result of

A

term that parties have not expressly included in their agreement but in opinion of court, would as reasonable people have included when making contract

result of precedence cases

25
Q

reasonable notice provision with employees (2 situations)

A
  • employer wants to terminate employee, give reasonable notice
  • employees give reasonable notice to employer for quitting
26
Q

What factors determine reasonable notice?
What time is it usually?
What can be provided for equivalent notice to a dismissed employee?

A
  • length of service, type of occupation, state of economy, age of employee
  • 2 and 4 weeks for every year to maximum of 2 years
  • Severance payment
27
Q

Doctrine of Privity

A

contract cannot as a general rule confer rights or oppose obligations arising under it on any person except parties to a contract

28
Q

Doctrine of Privity - rights, liabilities, and suing

A

no one except the parties in the contract can acquire rights or subject to the liabilities, or ability to sue

29
Q

Doctrine of Privity - what is exception?
1. Insurance
2. A trust
3. Novation

A

only insurance is an exception

30
Q
  1. Discharge of contract (3)

Contract discharged……obligation is at an ____ consideration has been _____ and obligations have been _________

A
  1. cancel obligation, contract null and inoperative.

2.end, exchanged, satisfied

31
Q

Discharge by performance -
- Tender of performance
- an advantage of it
- primary reason

A

One party attempts to perform but other refuses or accepts.
Adv: alleged of breach of contract
Primary Reason: Evidence

32
Q

Discharge by agreement: Describe The Waiver and what it becomes if ineffective

A

formally discharge both parties, parties agree that contract doesn’t have to perform.

ineffective when one party performs so becomes gratuitous promise

33
Q

Discharge by agreement: describe the Substituted agreement

A

new agreement, replace first agreement as it is discharged

34
Q

Novation

A

Substituted agreement with new party

35
Q

Accord and Satisfaction

A

when a party does not want to perform their agreement in contract, make an offer of a cash payment to buy out

36
Q

Option to terminate

A

ones offering the contract can buy the parties contract to terminate them etc sport contracts

37
Q

Discharge: Contact provides for its own dissolution - Condition Precedent

A

future or uncertain event which must either happen or not happen before promissor’s contractual liability is established

38
Q

Discharge: Contact provides for its own dissolution - Condition Subsequence`

A

uncertain event that happened of which brings promissor’s contractual liabilities to an end. An out is reserved is certain circumstances

39
Q

Discharge by frustration

A

courts excuse persons for failure to perform their contracts where inability to perform is not their fault

40
Q

Discharge by frustration - two examples

A
  1. performance has become impossible
  2. Performance physically possible but now has far different meaning than at time of original contract
41
Q

Frustrated Contracts Act

A

Reallocation of benefits already exchanged when contract discharged and future performance relieved