lexical development Flashcards

1
Q

Productive vocabulary​

A

the words a child can actually speak.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hyponym​

A

a word within a hypernym’s category (i.e. apple NOT fruit)​ (same for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hypernym​

A

a category into which other words fit (i.e. fruit NOT apple)​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mutual Exclusivity Assumption

A

The belief that something cannot be two things at once. eg. a poodle cannot be a dog and an animal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Categorical Overextension

A

a. The name for one member of a category is extended to all members of the category.
b. Apple used for all round fruit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Analogical Overextension

A

a. A word for one object is extended to one in a different category; some physical connection:
b. Cat for all fluffy things.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mismatch Statements

A

a. One-word sentences that appear abstract: child makes a statement about one object in relation to another.
b. Saying ‘duck’ when looking at an empty pond.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Underextension

A

a. When a child uses a word in a very restricted way, such as only to refer to one specific example
b. Eg a child learns that the family’s black cat is ‘cat’ but does not understand that the neighbor’s fluffy white cat can also be referred to by the same word
c. So seeing the word cat as a hyponym not hypernym.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Virtuous Error

A

A logially made mistake that makes sense as it shows that they are trying (applying grammatical rules, thinking logically, etc.) . Eg. eated, fish(i)es, feets, overextension.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Katherine Nelson on Categorizing 1st words: (5/6)

A
  1. Categorising first words:
    a. Naming things/people (60%)
    b. Actions/events
    c. Describing/modifying things
    d. Personal/social words
  2. Lexical not grammatical words
    a. Grammatical words are the ones that are weird to define (eg. Prepositions)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Eve Clark’s Semantic Feature Hypothesis: (6/7)

A

Identifies word (as in which word would work for this- think overextension) using some of the components/features associated with the word.
1. Taste
2. Sound
3. Movement
4. Shape
5. Size
6. Texture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Jean Aitchison Her 3 proposed stages for children. (4)

A
  1. Labelling:
  2. Packaging:
  3. Network Building:
  4. “Language had a biologically organised schedule”.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who proposed these stages?
Labelling
Packaging
Network Building

A

Jean Aitchison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who said that the first words would likely be to the purpose of:
a. Naming things/people (60%)
b. Actions/events
c. Describing/modifying things
d. Personal/social words

A

Katherine Nelson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who suggested these as features that might be associated (perhaps too much sometimes) with a word:
1. Taste
2. Sound
3. Movement
4. Shape
5. Size
6. Texture

A

Eve Clark

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how many of our first words are nouns?

A

60%

17
Q

Jean Aitchison Her 3 proposed stages for children. (4)
Labelling

A

Linking words to objects. Understanding that objects can be labelled.

18
Q

Jean Aitchison Her 3 proposed stages for children. (4)
Packaging

A

Exploring what labels can apply to. Over/under extension occurs in order to understand the range of a word’s meaning. Positive 😊.

19
Q

Jean Aitchison Her 3 proposed stages for children. (4)
Network Building

A

Making connections between words – understanding similarities and opposites in meanings.