FINALS Flashcards

1
Q

decisions require information, and although the availability of good
information doesn’t automatically mean that decisions also will be good, its
unavailability will almost always contribute to bad decisions.

A

Policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

is a very general word, meaning the effects of any actual or proposed
policy.

A

Impact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

is essentially an identification and
study of all significant environmental repercussions stemming from a course
of action.

A

Environmental Impact Analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

would estimate the costs of these different alternatives

with the aim of showing how they compared in terms of, say, the costs per
million gallons of delivered water into the town system.

A

cost-
effectiveness analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the objective

of which is to estimate the value of the damages to an injured resource so that
these amounts can be recovered from those held liable by the courts.

A

damage assessment, the

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

is based on the idea of making reasonable com-
prehensive adjustments to standard GDP measures to adjust for changes in the

value of the natural resources and services produced from them.

A

Green GDP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

is for the public sector what a profit-and-loss analysis is
for a business firm or a budget is for a household.

A

Benefit–Cost Analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

that involve direct public production: public waste treat-
ment plants, beach restoration projects, hazardous-waste incinerators, habitat

improvement projects, land purchase for preservation, and so on.

A

Physical projects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

that are aimed at enforcing environmental laws and
regulations, such as pollution-control standards, technological choices,
waste-disposal practices, restrictions on land development, and so on.

A

Regulatory programs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The study of where risk comes from and how people nor-
mally respond to it.

A

Risk assessment:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The study of what values, in terms of concepts such as will-
ingness to pay, people place on risk reduction.

A

Risk valuation:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The study of how different policies affect levels of envi-
ronmental risk to which people are exposed.

A

Risk management:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Engineers, hydrologists, and others must determine the
likelihood that the chemical will migrate to the aquifer, and how much the
citizens of the community will be exposed to it if it does. It could be that
other pathways of exposure also might have to be considered.

A

Exposure analysis:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Scientists must determine the relationship
between exposure levels to the chemical and impacts such as incidences
of cancer. Relationships like this are sought by laboratory scientists and by
epidemiologists.

A

Dose–response analysis:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Combining steps (1) and (2) makes it possible to esti-
mate the specific risks faced by members of the community in terms of, for

example, the number of premature deaths they could expect.

A

Risk characterization:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

of environmental quality im-
provements stem from the reduced damages this would produce.

A

benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

the estimation of

what future cost levels could be expected to be in the absence of the regula-
tion.

A

baseline analysis,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

left to itself, is likely to malfunction when matters of environmental pollution are involved.

A

The market system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

The essence of the model consists of a simple situation that characterizes all pollution-control activities.

A

trade-off

20
Q

The essence of the model consists of a simple trade-off situation that characterizes all pollution-control activities.
Reducing emissions reduces the damages that people suffer from environmental pollution
But reducing emissions takes resources that could have been used in some other way.

A

Suggests that optimal level of pollution is not zero.

21
Q

To describe the relationship between pollution and damage, we will use the idea of a

A

damage function.

22
Q

we mean all the negative impacts that users of the environment experience as a result of the degradation of that environment

A

damages

23
Q

are the costs of reducing the quantity of residuals being emitted into the environment, or of lowering ambient concentrations.

A

Abatement costs

24
Q

normally will differ from one source to another, depending on a variety of factors.

A

Abatement costs

25
Q

To get the minimum aggregate marginal abatement cost curve, the aggregate level of emissions must be distributed among the different sources in such a way that they all have the same marginal abatement costs. In effect what we have done here is to invoke the important

A

equimarginal principle.

26
Q

Emission reductions do not happen unless resources are devoted to enforcement.
To include all sources of cost we need to add ——————– to the analysis.

A

enforcement costs

27
Q

The model is very general and risks giving an —————— impression of pollution problems in the real world.

A

overly simplistic

28
Q

Measurement issues makes it useful to employ —————— as a primary policy criterion.

A

cost-effectiveness

29
Q

requires energy and resources.

A

Enforcement

30
Q

A widespread practice is for agencies to require ————— of emissions by firms.

A

self-reporting

31
Q

refers to measuring the performance in comparison to whatever requirements are set out in the relevant law.

A

Monitoring

32
Q

refers to the task of bringing to justice those whom monitoring has shown to be in violation of the law.

A

Sanctioning

33
Q

means that it cannot simply be assumed that each and every attempt at public environmental policy will make the situation better.

A

Government failure

34
Q

policies we mean policies that essentially allow the individuals involved in a case of enviro

A

“decentralized”

35
Q

systems rely on court proceedings in which plaintiffs and defendants meet to make claims and counterclaims, and in which juries often are called on to decide questions of fact and amounts of compensation.

A

Common-law

36
Q

approach mandates the behavior in law, then uses whatever enforcement machinery—courts, police, fines, and so on—are necessary to get people to obey the law.

A

command-and-control

37
Q

In the case of environmental policy, the command-and-control approach consists of relying on ——————-of various types to bring about improvements in environmental quality.

A

standards

38
Q

These total abatement costs are the ———————- of meeting the standard.

A

compliance costs

39
Q

are normally expressed in terms of average concentration levels over some period of time.

A

Ambient Standards

40
Q

The basic point of differentiation is that a performance standard, such as an emission standard, sets a constraint on some performance criterion and

A

then allows people to choose the best means of achieving it.

41
Q

A basic problem is that standards are all-or- nothing—either they are being met or they are not.
If they are being met

A

there is no incentive to do better

42
Q

Crossing the MAC function is a

A

marginal penalty function.

43
Q

Suppose authorities had instituted a ————————- cutback.

A

proportionate

44
Q

Emission charges lead to

A

tax revenues.

45
Q

A government might reduce employment taxes and increase emission taxes in such a way as to keep its total tax revenue the same.
This action has come to be known as the

A

double-dividend hypothesis.

46
Q

would pay a polluter a certain amount per ton of emissions for every ton it reduced, starting from some benchmark level.

A

emission subsidy

47
Q
A