17. Directors Duties Flashcards

1
Q

What are the common law duties of directors?

A
  1. Act in the interests of the company
  2. Act responsibly and honestly
  3. Act in accordance with the constitution and in accordance with law
  4. Not to make a secret profit and avoid conflict of interests
  5. Not to fetter their discretion
  6. Duty of care, diligence, and skill
  7. Have regard to interests of members
  8. Have regard to creditors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What section of the act outlines the duties?

A

Section 228

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Exercising powers bona fide in the interests of the company case law

A

Regencies plc v. Cohen

Nash v. Lancegaye

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Duty to act responsibly and honestly case law is also what?

A

A defence to the making of a restriction order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How is the duty to act in accordance with the constitution and within the law enforced?

An example of any activity prohibited by this duty?

A

Through misfeasance proceedings

The diversion of company funds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Are there any circumstances where the making of a profit/entering a conflict are permissible?

A

Yes. Where permitted by the constitution

Or

Where a special resolution is passed by its members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Regal Hastings v. Gulliver

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Competing with the company case law

A

Cooley

Peso Silver Mines

O’Malley

Anderson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Disc,owing a conflict of interest remedies

A

Profit held on constructive trust for company

Unduly harsh order

Damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can a director ever fetter his discretion?

A

Yes.

Where it is permitted by the constitution.

Where he is acting in good faith

The restriction has been approved by special resolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fulham football club Ltd v. Cabra Estates Plc

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Duty of care, skill, and diligence case law

A

Re Cuty Equitable Fire Insurane Co.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What kind of test is used to ascertain the duty of care, skill, and diligence?

A

A wholly subjective one

Courtney: “subjectivity in this context has been interpreted as meaning that an idiot, provided he is honest, can avoid liability”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Re Brazilian Rubber Plantations and Estates Ltd

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Duty of diligence

A

Where directors are put on notice of impropriety they must act to prevent it

Jackson v. Munster Bank Ltd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Duty of care - case law

A

Nowadays directors are more qualified, thus a higher standard is required of them.

Dorchester Finance Co v. Stabbing
- two non executive directors
- signed blank cheques which the managing director used to misappropriate funds
- one chartered account, one with vast experience
Held both had been negligent
Held the duties of directors, whether executive or not, are the same

17
Q

Duties of a non executive director

A

Less extensive than an executive director as they will not be so involved in the dealings of the company and will rely on the executive director to inform them of performance and other matters.

Re Mitek Holdings
- “there will usually be a real difference between the duties of an executive and non executive director”

18
Q

Re Barings Plc

A

Bank collapsed. Rogue trader left unsupervised and granted permission for significant funding by three directors.

Three directors had left him in control.
Allowed him to doctor accounts, and report profits while trading at a huge loss.
Ignored internal audit recommendations.

Held: “ each individual director owes duties to the company to inform himself about its affairs and to join with his codirectors and supervising and controlling them”

19
Q

Directors owing duties to shareholders

A

Allen v Hyatt

Coleman v Myers
- set out factors to be taken into account when deciding whether a duty to shareholders exists

  1. Dependence upon information and advice.
  2. Existence of a relationship of confidence.
  3. significance of the transaction
  4. Extent of any action taken by the director to promote it
20
Q

Directors owing duties to creditors?

A

Kinsela
“Where a company is insolvent the interests of the creditors intrude”

Re Frederick Inns Ltd

SC endorsed Kinsella decision
“ Once the company clearly had to be wound up and it’s assets applied pro tanto in discharge of its liabilities the directors had a duty to the creditors to preserve the assets to enable this to be done or at least not to dissipate them.”

21
Q

Do directors owe duties to employees?

A

No duties owed at common law.

But a statutory duty owed under s.224.

Directors only need to have regard to the interests of employees.

22
Q

Statutory duties of Directors

A
23
Q

Preventing transfer of substantial non cash assets

A

Can be approved by ordinary resolution

And informal agreement of all shareholders to enter into a transaction deemed to be sufficient.

Must be of requisite value. Not worth less than 5 thousand and exceeds 10% of the companies assets

24
Q

What are the effects of a breach of the duty to prevent transfer of substantial non cash assets?

A
  1. Contract is voidable unless
    - restitution no longer possible
    - company has already been indemnified
    - avoidance would affect an innocent third party
    - approval of the company has been given within a reasonable period after the transaction
  2. Directors and connected persons may be liable to account to the company for any profit made, as well as any loss the company suffered
  3. Company is also entitled to damages at common law (or equitable relief) provided it doesn’t produce a double benefit
25
Q

Defence to a breach?

A

Director can show he took reasonable steps to secure compliance

Connected persons can also show they did not know the circumstances giving rise to contravention

Directors should seek certs of compliance

26
Q
  1. Not to accept a loan, a guarantee, etc from the company

Effects of a breach

A

Director or connected person who benefitted from transaction must indemnify the company for any losses or account to it for any gains made.

Transaction is voidable at the instance of the company provided:

Restitution is possible
The company has not already been indemnified for loss/damage
There is no third party who has acquired rights bona fide for value and without actual notice of the contravention

27
Q

Ruby Property Company Ltd v. Kitty and Superquinn

A
28
Q

Effects of breach

A

Officers in default may be found guilty of a Category 2 offence

Did the loan contribute materially to its insolvency?

Or did it substantially impede the orderly winding up of the company?

If so, any who benefitted from the loan may be held personally liable for the company’s debts, with or without limit

29
Q

Exceptions to s.239 prohibition

A
  1. Where loan is less than 10% of the value of the company’s assets
  2. Does not prevent money being advanced to a director for vouched expenses
  3. Main exception - Summary Approval Procedure is properly pursued
  4. Where the company gives loans, etc in the ordinary course of its business
  5. Holding companies and subsidiaries can make loans, etc to one another
30
Q
  1. To disclose an interest in certain contracts
A
31
Q
  1. To disclose an interest in shares and debentures
A

Specified exceptions in Part 5

32
Q
  1. Duty to comply with the Companies Act
A

Every director must ensure company complies with the act

Must make “acknowledgement” of this fact upon taking office

33
Q

Indemnification of Directors

A

Constitution cannot exempt directors from liability

Indemnification from the company

Company can get negligence insurance in respect of its directors

Court can also relieve directors who have acted honestly and reasonably