2. Civil Case Analysis Flashcards
(113 cards)
What is the overriding objective?
r1.1 Dealing with a case justly and at proportionate cost
R1.2
The court must seek to give effect to the overriding objective when it exercises any power given to it by the rules
R1.3
The parties are required to help the court to further the overriding objective
Does the duty to assist the court to further the overriding objective mean that a party owes a duty to another party?
NO- woodward v phoenix healthcare distribution
What duty is imposed upon the court according to rule 1.4
The court has a duty to further the overriding objective by actively managing cases
What is a vulnerable witness?
When a factor- personal or situational, permanent or temporary may adversely affect their participation in proceedings or the giving of evidence
Court’s role in relation to vulnerable witnesses
The court should try to identify the vulnerability at the earliest possible stage of proceedings & consider whether a party’s participation or quality of evidence is likely to be diminished by reason of vulnerability
Things to consider regarding vulnerable witnesses
- Are they vulnerable (should be identified early on)?
- Will their participation or giving of evidence be diminished?
- Is it necessary to make directions to further the overriding objective?
- Should the court order ground rules prior to giving of evidence?
Potential ground rules for vulnerable witnesses
- Nature and extent of evidence
- Conduct of advocates/parties
- Any necessary support to be actioned for that person
How is Cross examination of a witness different from that of a vulnerable witness
Reflected in claim forms (7.2.1.6 and Appendix A(1) Directions Questionnaire (9.5.1.9) and Appendix A(7) and an application notice (10.2 and Appendix A12)
Client objectives
- What does the client want?
- Compensation, Apology, Day in court
- Is the damage recoverable?
- Is it too late to claim a remedy?
- Is a dispute damaging the cl’s business?
- Is maintaining a business relationship with the other side important?
Prospective parties
- Who will constitute all potential parties?
- Any issues of professional conduct?
- Is the defendant worth pursuing?
Evidence
- Collect relevant evidence
- Never delay taking a statement (proof of evidence) from cl and potential witnesses
Costs
What are the legal costs, how are they calculated, how will they be paid for?
Limitation/jurisdiction
When does the limitation period expire? Note this
For commercial disputes, does the contract provide for litigation to be conducted
Dispute Resolution
- Which form of DR is most appropriate?
- What are the advantages/disadvantages of the viable options
- Manage cl expectations
- Ensure cl receives a full assessment of the merits of their case
Pre Action protocols
- What steps should `parties take before commencing a case?
- What issues are in dispute, share info available to each of them & endeavour to resolve the matters
- Do pre-action protocols apply?
ADR
- Enter discussions or negotiations prior to proceedings
- Give serious consideration to any suitable form of available ADR
- r1.4(2)(e) - active case management requires encouraging ADR procedure
Standard letter before claim
- Potential Cl should send potential D a letter detailing the claim
- If approved protocol exists, it is to be followed, otherwise see appendix A(19) Practice Direction
- Enough info to be given so D can commence investigations and valuate the claim
- Prospective claimant should set out any proposals they have
Response letter
D acknowledgement of safe receipt of letter, whether liability is admitted
reasons to be given if denied
- Where primary liability is admitted, but contributory negligence is alleged details should be provided
- Cl should respond to any allegations
- Should ADR be addressed
How do proceedings initiate
Via claim form served on d
What else must be served to d
Full details (particulars) must be served
How can D contest the claim
D must file at court and serve a defence on Cl
Intermediate track
Trial will not last longer than 3 days. Any oral evidence is likely to be limited to 2 experts per party. CLaim must be brought by 1 cl against one or 2 defendants or 2 cl against one defendant