2025 Torts Class Notes Flashcards

02/08/25

1
Q

What are the three elements of trespass to land?

A
  1. Intent to enter another person’s property or commit the act that causes entry
  2. Tangible intrusion on the property in possession of another
  3. Physical harm not required
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In Creel v. Crim, what is the rationale for indemnity?

A

It is fair to indemnify the innocent employee, shifting the entire burden to the employer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How are damages for trespass measured?

A

By the difference in value of the land before and after the trespass occurred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the definition of trespass according to Stukes v. Bachmeyer?

A

Trespass occurs when an unauthorized person:
1. Physically enters another’s land
2. Causes/permits a thing to cross the boundary of the property of another
3. Fails to remove from the land that which the person has a duty to remove.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

True or False: Necessity is a complete defense to trespass.

A

True, but the defendant still needs to pay damages as appropriate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In TL Crowther (Utah), what is the measure of damages for injury to trees on land?

A

A flexible one, based on reasonableness, either diminution in value or reasonable restoration costs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the two types of nuisance?

A
  1. Private Nuisance
  2. Public Nuisance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does liability for nuisance depend on?

A

The gravity of harm to the plaintiff versus the utility of the defendant’s conduct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the gravity of harm analysis in nuisance claims?

A

Factors include:
1. Extent of harm
2. Character of harm
3. Social value attached
4. Suitability of particular use invaded
5. Burden of avoidance of harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the holding in Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co. regarding economic loss?

A

The court’s damage calculation is for economic loss to their property, not for health concerns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the definition of public nuisance?

A

Substantial and unreasonable interference with a right held in common by the general public, in health, safety, and convenience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is strict liability?

A

Liability without proof of intent or fault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What activities are considered abnormally dangerous?

A

Activities that involve a high risk of injury despite precautions and are not commonly used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the factors for determining abnormal danger?

A
  1. High degree of risk of some harm
  2. Likelihood that resultant harm will be great
  3. Inability to eliminate risk
  4. Not a common action
  5. Inappropriate to the place
  6. Value to the community outweighed by the dangerousness.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What must be proven for a products liability claim?

A
  1. Proper Parties
  2. Defectiveness (manufacturing, design, warning)
  3. Causation
  4. Scope of Liability
  5. Damages.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What constitutes a manufacturing defect?

A

A product made which varies from specifications in such a way that it causes injury.

17
Q

What is the Restatement (Second) of Products Liability § 402A about?

A

A seller is liable for physical harm caused by a product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer.

18
Q

Fill in the blank: The intent of the seller is ______ in strict liability cases.

A

not considered

19
Q

What is the outcome of Escola v. Coca Cola regarding manufacturer liability?

A

A manufacturer incurs absolute liability when a product they placed in the market proves to have a defect that causes injury.

20
Q

In Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc., what is required to establish liability?

A

Injury occurred while using the product as intended and the injury was the result of a defect in design and manufacture.

21
Q

What must be proven regarding the seller in a products liability case?

A

Seller is the proper defendant

22
Q

What condition must the buyer maintain regarding the product?

A

Buyer can’t modify (must still be in the same condition as when manufactured)

23
Q

What does ‘unreasonably dangerous’ mean?

A

Dangerous to an extent beyond that which would be contemplated by the ordinary consumer who purchases it

24
Q

When must a product be considered dangerous?

A

Must be dangerous at the time it leaves the seller’s hands

25
What defines a manufacturing defect?
Product departs from design specifications and standards in such a way that it prevents the product from operating safely
26
What is the test for determining a manufacturing defect?
Compare product to manufacturer specs/standards - is it more or less safe?
27
What is the definition of design defects?
All products have this flaw which makes them unreasonably dangerous
28
What is the risk-utility test in design defects?
Weighing the risk vs. utility, which is a difficult determination often reserved for a jury
29
What is the consumer expectations test?
A test to determine if a product has a design defect based on ordinary consumer expectations
30
What are warning and instruction defects also known as?
Marketing defects
31
What is the implication of misuse of a product in a products liability claim?
Misuse of a product is a defense, but NOT if D invited the misuse
32
In the case of Welge v Planters Lifesavers Co, what was the issue regarding the label?
The sellers invited users to remove the label, therefore the use was normal (not misuse)
33
What must be established to prove liability regarding product use?
You don't have to exclude every possibility, just that ordinary people are using the product in ordinary ways
34
What legal principle is applied in the context of accidents as evidence of liability?
'BUT FOR' causation
35
What is the significance of commercials in consumer expectations?
Commercials do set consumer expectations; manufacturers must beware
36
What is the crashworthiness doctrine?
A legal principle that requires manufacturers to ensure that their products can withstand foreseeable accidents
37
In the Campbell v. General Motors Corp case, what is noted about expert testimony?
If ordinary people have knowledge of the issue at hand, no expert testimony is required
38
What is the legal term for a product that is defective by design?
Defective Per Se
39
Fill in the blank: A product has a design defect under the _______ test.
consumer expectations