2.3 Sociological Theories Of Criminality Flashcards
(31 cards)
Sociological theories-durkhiem-functionalist
Durkheim was a functionalist who believed society was a stable structure because everyone shared norms,values and beliefs and everyone agreed what was right and wrong thus produces solidarity
What did Durkheim suggest shared norms and values meant for society
Durkheim recognised that crime was inevitable this was because in every society some people were inadequately socialised which meant that they didn’t share the same norms and therefore were likely to deviate understood that society contains lots of social groups so shared rules and behaviour less clear he called this ‘anomie’
Name the four functions of crime- Durkheim
Boundary Maintenance:
Crime reminds us what’s right and wrong. When people break the rules, it shows everyone what’s not allowed, and society reacts by punishing or criticizing the behavior, which helps keep things in order
.
Adaptation and Change:
Crime can lead to change. Sometimes, when people break the rules, it shows that society’s rules need to be updated or improved. This helps society grow and adapt over time.
Safety Valve:
Crime can release tension. If people feel frustrated or stressed, certain minor crimes (like prostitution) can give them a way to blow off steam without causing bigger problems.
Warning Signal:
Crime can be a warning. If crime rates go up in certain areas, it can signal that something’s wrong in society, like poverty or inequality, and needs to be fixed
Strengths of Durkheim
Crime Can Have Positive Functions:
Crime can help society stay balanced by reinforcing rules and encouraging change.
Looks at Society as a Whole:
Functionalism shows how different parts of society work together to keep things running smoothly.
Focuses on Stability and Order:
It highlights how institutions like family and education keep society stable and organized
Limitations of Durkheim
Doesn’t Say How Much Crime is Right:
Functionalism doesn’t explain the right amount of crime for society to function properly.
Crime Isn’t Good for Everyone:
Not everyone benefits from crime, especially victims who suffer.
Doesn’t Explain Social Change:
Functionalism focuses on stability but doesn’t explain how or why societies change over time.
Ignores Inequality:
Functionalism overlooks how some groups take advantage of power and inequality in society.
Merton sociological theory-functionalism
Argues the root cause of crime was due to unequal structure of society
Explain more on Merton
Hard working school = wealth
However not everyone has the opportunity to access this so led to blocked opportunities this was because of poverty and inadequate schools this led to crime and deviant behaviour so they did this illegally
Explain the other ways that can be categorised into 4 categories-Merton
Each categories results to different outcomes
Innovation-accept the goal but find criminal ways of achieving goals
Ritualism-gives up striving for success end up in a dead end job
Retreatism-dropouts who reflect both opinions they end up as vagrant and drug addicts
Rebellion- reject the options but replace with their own
Strengths of mertons theory
Shows how normal and deviant behaviour arise from the same goals
Explains why most crime in statistics is property crime and why working class crime rates are higher.
Limitations of mertons
Ignores crimes of wealthy
Focus on Utilitarian Crime( money crimes don’t focus on like graffiti)
The theory doesn’t account for other factors that can influence criminal behavior, such as peer influence,
Cohen- what did he suggest why people commit crime
Agreed with mertons strain theory that deviance results from lower class failure to achieve legitimate purposes he focuses on crime that’s not for financial gain e.g vandalism
Explain cohen-status frustration
Working class boys end up at the bottom of school’s official status hierarchy and feel frustrated and worthless
Explain the definition of an subculture
it’s when a specific group is held back or punished because their lifestyle or ideas don’t fit into the mainstream
Cloward and ohlin three subcultures
Criminal subcultures- arise in areas when there is longstanding professional criminal network they select suitable youths to groom for money crimes and future criminal career
Conflict subcultures-Arise where the only criminal opportunities are within street gangs violence provides a release for frustration and leads to winning territory(status,materiality)
Retreatist subcultures-are made up if dropouts who have failed in both legitimate and illegitimate structures and are often based on drug use
Strengths of cloward and ohlin subcultures
Subcultures Help Members
Subcultures help people by offering ways to reach goals when they can’t do it the usual, legal way.
Cloward and Ohlin explain that different neighborhoods provide different illegal opportunities, leading to different subcultures.
Limitations of cloward and ohen subcultures
Not Everyone Shares the Same Goals
While some people turn to subcultures when they can’t achieve mainstream goals, others never share those goals and might turn to crime for different reasons.
Ignores Wealthy Crimes and Over-predicts Working-Class Crime:
The theory mostly focuses on working-class crime and overlooks crimes committed by the wealthy.
Real-life subcultures don’t always fit neatly into one of Cloward and Ohlin’s three types. Some subcultures mix traits from all three
What is the idea of Marxism
Marxist criminology views crime as a product of social and economic inequalities inherent in capitalist systems. It argues that laws are designed and enforced to maintain the power of the ruling class, often disproportionately targeting the working class. This perspective emphasizes that the capitalist system itself can be “criminogenic,” meaning it creates conditions that encourage and make crime more likely
Marxism-two classes
Society is divided into two main class groups - Bourgeoisie and Proletariat
Bourgeoisie- the ruling class. They own the means of production.
They exploit the working class for profit
Proletariat-The working class. They have to sell their labour in order to
e working
The working class. They have to sell their labour in order to survive
Capitalism Causes Crime-Marxism
Exploitation:
For the working class living in poverty, crime might be the only way to survive.
Consumerism:
Advertising pushes people to commit crimes, like stealing, to afford things they’re made to want.
Alienation and Frustration:
Inequality makes people frustrated, leading some to commit crimes that aren’t about gaining money, but just acting out.
Greed and the Profit Motive:
Capitalism encourages competition, pushing people and companies to commit crimes to get ahead or make more money.
Example to support Marxism
Out of 200 companies who had broken safety laws, only 3 were prosecuted
Describe one sociological theory or criminality-Marxism
Marxism theory explains criminality as a result of class conflict there are two classes the upper class-Bourgeoisie creates law to protect their wealth and power while the working class- Proletariat may turn to crime due to poverty and inequality for example white collar crime crimes such as tax evasion are overlooked while street crimes like theft are heavily policed this demonstrates how the system favours the ruling class and punishes the working class disproportionately
Strengths of Marxism
Shows how poverty can cause working class crime and how capitalism promotes greed and encourages ruling class crime too.
Shows how law making and enforcement are biased against the working class and in favour of the powerful
Limitations of Marxism
Focuses on class and ignores the relationship between crime and other inequalities e.g. race or gender
Over predicts the amount of working class crime - not all poor people turn to crime.
Not all capitalist societies have high crime rates (however Marxists point out that in countries with little welfare provision, like the USA, the crime rates are higher).
Right realism main idea
Crime is a real problem
Free will
Right realists view crime as a rational decision-making process, where potential offenders consider the potential benefits and risks of committing a crime
Right realists advocate for harsh punishments, including increased incarceration rates, to deter offenders.
They support a “zero-tolerance” approach to crime, arguing that even minor offenses should be dealt with severely
Right realists also advocate for situational crime prevention measures, such as installing surveillance cameras and improving security measures.