A02 maintenance if romantic rel Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 3 sections for the evaluation if the set

A

Profit and loss
Comparison level
Limitations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who tested profit and loss

A

Rusbult and mart

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did rusbult and mart fo and find

A

Used the theory to explain why women stay in abusive rels

A woman may do so cz the investments are high (kids, financial securuty) and alternatives are low (nowhere else to live, no money) this could still be considered a profit situation so she’ll remain in the rel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who tested comparison level

A

Simpson et al

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Simpson et al do and find

A

The way in which people reduce potential alternative or threats to protect the rel

Asked Pps to rate members of opposition sex. Those already in rel gave lower rating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Problem in terms of comparison level

A

Set doesn’t explain why people go into a rel even though there are no alternatives
Also doesn’t explain how great the despair in Cl must be ti become unsatisfactory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Talk about general limitations to the set

A

The selfish nature of the theory
Are people really only motivated to maintaining a rel due to selfish concerns
Does this only apply to individualist cultures which brings in cultural bias

It also focuses too much on the individuals perspective and informed the social aspects if a rel e.g. how they communicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who tested The role if relationship inequity in marital disruption

A

Demaris

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 3 sections for the equity theory

A

Exchange and communal rels
The role if relationship inequity in marital disruption
Equit:an insufficient theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did deMaris do and find

A

Investigated whether martial inequity is linked to marital disruption

Found that the only subjective index linking inequity with disruption is women’s sens of being under benefited. Greater under benefit = higher chance if disruption/divorce.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who tested exchange and communal rels

A

Clark and mills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Clark and mills do and find

A

Disagrees that rels are based on economics (input and output)

Found that although exchange rles may involve keeping track if rewards and costs, communal rels are governed more by the desire to respond to the needs of the partner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who talked about equity being an insufficient theory

A

Ragsdale

Brandau-brown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did ragsdale say about it

A

Equity isn’t a key determinant of rel maintenance

Theory is an incomplete rendering of the way in which married couples behave with respect to each other

So the theory is insufficient to explain marital maintenance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly