Conditionality Flashcards
what’s the interp on conditionality good?
The judge should consider any germane opportunity cost to the plan
why do they destroy cost benefit analysis when they say conditionality bad?
Limiting the neg to 1 advocacy artificially insulates the aff from competitive options.
why is conditionality key to tactical choices?
B) Key to tactical choices—forces the 2ac to recognize and respond to strategic interactions—critical skill for advocacy — strategic opponents are inevitable.
why is conditionality key to advocacy construction?
forces the aff to defend their position from all sides— inability to simultaneously defend against a variety of proposals props up bad affs that should lose
why should the judge Err neg on conditionality?
2ar persuasion, no Uniqueness for production DAs, aff picks the focus of the debate, the topic is huge, and the 2nr has to answer theory and substance
why shouldn’t the judge vote on aff theory?
-causes substance crowd-out and incentivizes cheap-shot theory args based on marginal differentials—just because debate could be better doesn’t mean we should lose.
what’s conditionality point A
good
A) They destroy cost benefit analysis —Limiting the neg to 1 advocacy artificially insulates the aff from competitive options.
what’s conditionality point B
good
B) Key to tactical choices—forces the 2ac to recognize and respond to strategic interactions—critical skill for advocacy — strategic opponents are inevitable.
what’s conditionality point C
good
C) Advocacy construction— forces the aff to defend their position from all sides— inability to simultaneously defend against a variety of proposals props up bad affs that should lose
what’s conditionality point D
good
D) Err neg—2ar persuasion, no Uniqueness for production DAs, aff picks the focus of the debate, the topic is huge, and the 2nr has to answer theory and substance
what’s conditionality point E
good
E) Don’t vote on theory—causes substance crowd-out and incentivizes cheap-shot theory args based on marginal differentials—just because debate could be better doesn’t mean we should lose.
recite the conditionality good block
The judge should consider any germane opportunity cost to the plan
A) They destroy cost benefit analysis —Limiting the neg to 1 advocacy artificially insulates the aff from competitive options.
B) Key to tactical choices—forces the 2ac to recognize and respond to strategic interactions—critical skill for advocacy — strategic opponents are inevitable.
C) Advocacy construction— forces the aff to defend their position from all sides— inability to simultaneously defend against a variety of proposals props up bad affs that should lose
D) Err neg—2ar persuasion, no Uniqueness for production DAs, aff picks the focus of the debate, the topic is huge, and the 2nr has to answer theory and substance
E) Don’t vote on theory—causes substance crowd-out and incentivizes cheap-shot theory args based on marginal differentials—just because debate could be better doesn’t mean we should lose.