2.6 Flashcards
(35 cards)
macroeconomic objective 1
strong and stable growth
macroeconomic objective 2
low unemployment
macroeconomic objective 3
low and stable inflation
macroeconomic objective 4
balanced trade account
macroeconomic objective 5
balanced government budget
macroeconomic objective 6
environmental protection
macroeconomic objective 7
greater income equality
interest rate
cost of borrowing, reward for saving
near 0 to respond to 08 but increased now (base)
monetary policies
bank base rate (interest)
quantitative easing (create new money)
forward guidance (consumer confidence by being open)
IR ↓ on economy
signal to retail bank
better to borrow
C/I ↑ causes AD shift, u/e ↓
BUT PL ↑ & -ve output gap
IR ↑ on economy
signal to retail bank
worse to borrow
C/I ↓ causes AD shift u/e ↑
and PL ↓
households less disposable (?)
sacrifice GDP for price stability
IR ↓ on income equality
equality improves as
mortgages are less, more spending money
boost employment
typically higher earners save more so returns fall
IR ↓ on income equality EVAL
time length, diff for everyone e.g. high earners dont always save more, asset prices
issues (5) with economic growth as measure of living standards
not distributed equally
environment
happiness/ QoL
population
price level?
fiscal policy
government spending and taxation to stabilise economy
austerity
reduce gov. budget deficit by cutting spending or increasing tax
expansionary fiscal policy
↑I crowding in
↑G on transfer (C↑) / state sector
↓Taxation, disposable Y↑ (C↑) or more profit (↑I)
AD shifts out
contractionary fiscal policy
I↓ crowding out, capital flight
G↓ on public wage & benefit (C↓)
↑Tax
demand pull deflation
AD shifts in
G>T
deficit so more bonds, public debt increases and total interest on bonds
G<T
surplus so no need for more bonds, bonds mature so debt decrease and future borrowing is cheaper and credible
but side effects depends on how achieved
crowding in
gov. spending increases private investment, e.g. infrastructure, health so increase in productivity
so I↑ as more attractive
crowding out
gov. spending fails to increase AD as fall in private investment/ spending (cant compete with gov, higher taxes asw)
laffer curve
tax cut can increase revenue as
more incentive to work/ invest, less to avoid and evade taxes and move (& vice versa, ppf)
contractionary fiscal eval
lower gov. spending so negative multiplier spiral, in attempt to reduce deficit, growth reduces and less tax revenue which offsets spending cuts