2.6 Property offences Flashcards
(22 cards)
Theft
Actus reus
The appropriation of property belonging to another
Theft
Actus reus: define appropriation
coming by property without stealing it or later assumptions of a right to keep it, or deal with it as owner
Theft
Actus reus: What does property include
Money and all other propery real or personal
Theft
Actus reus: What does s4 of the Theft act say cannot be stolen
Land
Mushrooms, flowers, fruit growing in the wild (unless picked for finantial gain)
Wild creatures unless tamed
Theft
case outlining actus reus
R v Morris
Theft
Facts of R v Morris
The D was shopping at a supermarket and decided to switch price labels of 2 items to try and get it at a cheaper price
Theft
Held in R v Morris
‘Appropriation’, switching price labels interfered with the owners rights
Theft
Mens rea
Dishonesty and intention to permanently deprive
Theft
Mens rea: What are the 3 situations where a theft would not be dishonest
if D has the right to deprive other of it
if D would had other consent if they knew about the appropriation and the circumstances of it
if person whom property belongs cannot be discovered
Theft
Mens rea: What is the 2 part test to clarify the meaning of dishonesty
Was what the D did dishonest according to ordinary standard of a reasonable and honest person
Did the D realise what they had done was dishonest according to these standards
Theft
Mens rea: How is intention to permenantly deprive found
If the D treats the thing as his own to dispose of, disregarding the owners rights
And if item has returned but value has diminished
Theft
Mens rea: give some example of returning an item but it’s value diminishing
Using batteries then giving them back
Selling a persons property back to them pretending to be the true owner
Theft
Case outlining mens rea
R v Lloyd
Theft
Facts of R v Lloyd
D worked in a cinema and took films so him and his coworkers can make copies to watch at another time
Theft
Held in R v Lloyd
No theft as he did not fulfill ‘intention to permanently deprive’, he returned the copies with no value lost
Theft
What are the defences applicable to theft
Duress by threat and Duress by circumstances
Robbery:
Actus reus
Stealing, and immediatley before or at the time of doing so, and in order to do so, uses force on any person
Theft
‘steals’
a theft must be committed, not theft no robbery
Theft
‘use of force on any person’
D must apply or threaten to apply force to V in order to steal
Theft
‘and in order to do so’
the force must be in order to steal
Theft
‘immediately before or at the time of doing so’
Timing of the use or threat of the force must be right before or during the theft
Robbery
Mens rea
Dishonesty and intention to permanetly deprive with intention to use force in order to steal