2.7: Implications of Changing Political Economy Flashcards

1
Q

Transition to Market-Based Economy

A

Transitioning to a market-based economic system, particularly in post-communist

Eastern European states, has often been accompanied by economic and political chaos.

Liberalization of economies, privatization, and competition led to some inefficiencies, state support for failing enterprises, budget deficits, and hyperinflation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Successful Transition Policies

A

“Shock therapy” economic policies, characterized by quick liberation of prices and trade, tight monetary policy to control inflation, and rapid privatization, were successful in Eastern European states like the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland.

These policies correlated with faster economic growth compared to countries that implemented reforms more slowly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Implications for International Business

A

The end of the Cold War and the global shift towards free markets and democracy have opened up previously closed markets in Eastern Europe, Latin America, Africa, and Asia.

These markets, though still undeveloped, are potentially enormous and offer significant opportunities for international businesses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Associated Risks

A

Despite the potential gains, there are substantial risks involved in doing business in these new market economies. T

he future of democracy in Eastern Europe is uncertain, and there’s a possibility of economic setbacks.

The world may shift from a bipolar to a multipolar structure dominated by different civilizations, leading to conflicts and challenges for international investments.

Companies must consider these risks while exploring opportunities in these markets.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Implications for International Business

A

The implications for international business from the material discussed in this chapter fall into two main categories.

The first category relates to how a country’s political, economic, and legal environment influences its attractiveness as a market or investment site.

This includes assessing the benefits, costs, and risks associated with doing business in that country.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Attractiveness

A

A country’s overall attractiveness for international business is determined by balancing the long-term benefits, costs, and risks associated with doing business in that country.

Several factors contribute to these determinants, which affect a company’s decision to enter or invest in a particular market.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Benefits of Doing Business in a Country

A

The long-term monetary benefits of doing business in a country depend on factors such as the size of the market, the purchasing power of consumers, and the country’s future economic prospects.

While some countries may have a large population, low living standards can limit their economic market size.

However, assessing a country’s future potential is crucial, as rapid economic growth can transform a seemingly impoverished nation into a significant market.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Early Entrants vs. Late Entrants

A

Early entrants into potential future economic stars may gain advantages such as **building brand loyalty, gaining experience in the country’s business practices, and achieving substantial first-mover advantages. **

In contrast, late entrants may face disadvantages, including the challenge of competing with established players.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Economic System and Property Rights

A

A country’s economic system and property rights regime can serve as reliable indicators of its economic prospects.

Free market economies with strong property rights tend to experience higher economic growth rates compared to command economies or those with weak property rights.

Therefore, a country’s economic system and property rights, combined with market size, can provide insights into the potential long-term benefits of doing business there.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Political Factors Affecting Costs

A

In some countries, the costs of doing business can increase due to the need to pay off politically powerful individuals or entities in exchange for market access.

This need to pay essentially bribes is more prevalent in closed totalitarian states compared to open democratic societies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Economic Factors Affecting Costs

A

The sophistication of a country’s economy is a critical economic factor influencing the costs of doing business.

Less developed economies may lack necessary infrastructure and supporting businesses, potentially forcing international firms to provide their own, thus raising costs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

McDonald’s Example in Russia

A

McDonald’s decision to open its first restaurant in Moscow required vertical integration backward to ensure product quality.

The company had to establish its own dairy farms, cattle ranches, vegetable plots, and food processing plants within Russia to meet quality standards, increasing the cost of doing business in Russia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Legal Factors Impacting Costs

A

Legal factors influencing the cost of doing business include strict standards and regulations related to product safety, workplace safety, and environmental pollution.

Inadequate business contract laws in some countries can lead to difficulties in resolving contract disputes, resulting in substantial losses for international firms

Additionally, countries with weak intellectual property protection can lead to the unauthorized use or theft of an international business’s intellectual property.

This, in turn, can result in lost income and increased costs for businesses operating in such countries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Political Factors Affecting Risks

A

Political risk refers to the likelihood of political forces causing significant changes in a country’s business environment that can negatively impact a business enterprise’s profitability and goals.

Political risk tends to be higher in countries experiencing social unrest, disorder, or factors that increase the likelihood of such unrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Social Unrest as a Form of Political Risk

A

Social unrest often manifests as strikes, demonstrations, terrorism, and violent conflicts, all of which can disrupt business operations.

Social unrest is more likely in countries with multiple ethnic nationalities, competing political ideologies, economic mismanagement (e.g., high inflation), or those situated near fault lines between civilizations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Economic Impact of Social Unrest

A

Social unrest can lead to sudden changes in government policies and even abrupt changes in government, affecting business operations.

Prolonged civil strife resulting from social unrest can have detrimental economic consequences, such as the seizure of assets without compensation or the collapse of local economies.

17
Q

Examples of Political Risk Impact

A

After the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran, the new Iranian government seized the Iranian assets of numerous U.S. companies without compensation.

The violent breakup of the Yugoslavian federation into warring states like Bosnia, Croatia, and Serbia led to economic collapse and reduced profitability for investments in those countries.

18
Q

Business Costs of Protests in Chile and Hong Kong

A

The 2018 and 2019 protests in Chile and Hong Kong resulted in significant business costs, including the closure of roads, ports, stock exchanges, hotels, customs points, and airports.

These disruptions made it increasingly difficult for businesses to continue their operations, affecting various sectors, including academia, as seen in the relocation of the Academy of International Business annual meeting.

19
Q

Economic Risk Due to Government Mismanagement

A

Economic risk arises when government mismanagement of a country’s economy leads to significant changes in the business environment, negatively impacting the goals and profitability of businesses.

While economic risks often correlate with political risks, they are treated as a distinct category because economic mismanagement does not always directly result in social unrest.

Indicators of economic mismanagement include a country’s inflation rate and the level of debt, both in the business and government sectors.

20
Q

Asian Financial Crisis of 1997-98

A

Point 1: Rapid increase in business debt in Asian countries like Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, and South Korea during the 1990s was encouraged by the government for “strategic importance” industries.

Point 2: Overinvestment led to excessive industrial and commercial capacity, resulting in many uneconomic investments.

Point 3: Inability to generate profits for debt payments led to a surge in nonperforming loans for banks, and foreign investors began pulling their money out of these countries, triggering the 1997-98 financial crisis in Southeast Asia.

Point 4: The crisis included a severe decline in Asian stock markets, currency devaluation, reduced local demand, and prolonged economic recession.

21
Q

Government Intervention During the 2008-09 Financial Crisis

A

Point 1: During the 2008-09 worldwide financial crisis, governments in countries like the United States intervened in various ways to address the crisis.

Point 2: Interventions ranged from bailouts and acquisitions of struggling financial companies (e.g., Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, AIG) to providing financial aid to non-financial companies like General Motors.

Point 3: These interventions demonstrated that even governments committed to free-market principles were willing to take an activist role in managing their economies and supporting specific companies during crises.

22
Q

Impact of Financial Crisis on Countries

A

Point 1: Financial crises have widespread effects on countries, not limited to individual companies.

Point 2: Countries often borrow money to support their spending, and during crises, their tax base shrinks due to declining property values, reduced consumer spending, and higher unemployment.

Point 3: Different countries experience financial crises in different ways, with varying impacts on their economies.

23
Q

Legal Risks in International Business

A

Legal risks arise when a country’s legal system lacks sufficient safeguards against contract violations and property rights violations.

Point 2: Weak legal safeguards can lead firms to break contracts or expropriate intellectual property opportunistically.

Point 3: High legal risks in a country may deter international businesses from entering into long-term contracts or joint ventures with local firms.

Point 4: Organizations like the European Commission and the World Justice Project assess countries’ legal systems and their performance in upholding the rule of law.

24
Q

Overall Attractiveness of a Country for International Business

A

The attractiveness of a country for international business depends on evaluating the benefits, costs, and risks associated with doing business there.

Point 2: Generally, costs and risks are lower in economically advanced, politically stable democratic nations and higher in less developed, politically unstable nations.

Point 3: Future economic growth rates play a crucial role in determining the long-term benefits of doing business in a country.

Point 4: Economies with free market systems and growth potential are likely to offer a more favorable benefit-cost-risk trade-off.

Point 5: In contrast, politically unstable, mixed or command economies, and nations with speculative financial bubbles may have less favorable trade-offs for international businesses.

25
Q

Ethics and Regulations in International Business

A

Issue 1: Doing business in nations that violate human rights

Debate: Companies from democratic nations face an ethical dilemma regarding whether to do business in totalitarian countries like China, which violate human rights. There are two sides to this issue.

Critics’ View: Some argue that investing in such countries supports dictators and repressive regimes that abuse human rights. Western investment, they say, provides comfort to these regimes.

Supporters’ View: On the other hand, some argue that Western investment can help raise a totalitarian country’s level of economic development, potentially leading to greater political freedoms over time.

Point 1: Investment boycotts by Western nations, such as the boycotts against South Africa during apartheid, have been credited with bringing about political change in totalitarian countries.

Point 2: However, economic sanctions and investment boycotts have not always had a similar impact, as seen in the cases of Cuba and Iran.

Conclusion: Firms must make their own ethical judgments about investing in totalitarian states on a case-by-case basis, considering the repressiveness of the regime and its willingness to change.

26
Q

Ethics of doing business in countries with lax labor and environmental regulations.

A

Debate: International businesses face ethical questions about operating in countries with weak labor and environmental regulations.

Point 1: Operating in such countries may lead to labor exploitation and environmental degradation, raising ethical concerns.

Point 2: However, proponents argue that foreign investment can bring economic development, better labor practices, and improved environmental standards to these countries.

27
Q

Ethics of corruption in international business.

A

Debate: Corruption is an ethical concern in international business.

Point 1: Companies may face bribery and corrupt practices when operating in countries with high levels of corruption.

Point 2: Ethical businesses strive to avoid corruption, but they may face challenges in navigating corrupt environments.

Conclusion: International businesses must navigate these ethical issues while making strategic decisions regarding their operations in different countries.

28
Q

What is the ethical dilemma related to international firms and standards?

A

Should international firms adhere to the same product safety, work safety, and environmental protection standards as their home country, especially in less developed countries?

Western firms often face the dilemma of adhering to tough Western standards in countries with less stringent regulations.

29
Q

Which Western companies have been criticized for using sweatshop labor in developing nations?

A

The Gap, Disney, Wal-Mart, Loblaw’s Joe Fresh, and Nike have faced criticism for using sweatshop labor.

30
Q

Is there a straightforward answer to the ethical dilemma of adhering to Western standards?

A

No, there is no easy answer to this dilemma. Each case should be assessed based on its own merits, considering factors like profitability and job creation.

31
Q

What are the competing ethical considerations in this dilemma?

A

The ethical considerations involve whether to adhere to Western standards and potentially make foreign investment unprofitable, or to adhere to local standards and provide jobs and income to the foreign country.

32
Q

What is the ethical dilemma related to bribes and corruption in international business?

A

Should international businesses pay bribes to corrupt government officials to gain market access in foreign countries?

33
Q

What laws exist in the United States and Canada related to bribes in international business?

A

The United States has the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and Canada has the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act to combat corrupt business practices on the international stage.

33
Q

What is the debate surrounding paying bribes in some parts of the world?

A

In some regions, paying bribes is considered a part of business, and it’s argued that it can bring benefits such as income and jobs to the local populace.

33
Q

Why do some economists suggest that corruption may improve efficiency and help growth in certain circumstances?

A

In countries with cumbersome regulations, corruption in the form of side payments to government bureaucrats might speed up business approvals and enhance welfare.

34
Q

How does corruption potentially harm economic growth?

A

Corruption can reduce the returns on business investment by siphoning profits to unproductive bureaucrats, which may discourage business investment and slow economic growth.

35
Q

What did one economist’s study find regarding the connection between corruption and economic growth?

A

The study found that corruption had a significant negative impact on a country’s economic growth rate in 70 countries.

36
Q

What strengthens the moral case against engaging in corruption, despite potential benefits?

A

Corruption tends to “corrupt” both the bribe giver and the bribe taker, making it difficult to stop once it starts, strengthening the moral argument against it.