3 - Platform Strategies Flashcards
(42 cards)
The 3-step procedure for managing network effects:
- Actors - identify economic agents who want to interact and convince them to become users.
- Linkage - Figure out how the participation of some users creates (or destroys) value for other users of the platform
3- Leverage - Evaluate the relative strengths of the various network effects in order to activate them as effectively as possible.
Input force vs output force:
Input force comes from an increase in participation in one group. Output force is the increase in the other group, resulting from the positive CGNE operating through the platform.
What is the objective in the leverage step?
To maximize output force (that will depend on the strength of the CGNE) and minimize the effort needed to exert the input force. So the RULE is to select the group with largest output force in relation to its input force (ratio) and start with this group.
What is an example of the leverage step, i.e., maximizing output force? (hint: Primark, night clubs etc)
In a shopping mall it can be good to attract a flagship store like Primark or HM because this will attract more consumers, and when consumers are present, other stores want to establish in the mall as well –> positive loop.
And for night clubs - attract women first.
BUT the input force is typically more costly, ex costly to get Primark into the mall and you need to attract women with discounts.
What affects the cost of attracting the input?
Depends on the input’s:
- outside options (affects price elasticity)
- stand-alone benefits that you offer (that is not affected by the network size)
- WGNE - if there are high WGNE it’s easier to attract.
- marginal costs -choose the input group with the lowest cost.
What is super important when launching a platform?
To create and manipulate the EXPECTATIONS because if no one believes this platform will have users, no one will join - null equilibrium. But if sufficiently amount of people believe in it, you might be able to attract the critical mass and reach the high equilbrium.
Marquee strategy.
Attract users with large CGNE, for example Primark in a mall or a famous DJ on a festival.
- Disadv = costly.
Solving chicken egg - Strategy of offering high stand-alone value:
Provide value to users even if no one else is on the platform. Ex DVD player in the Blu-Ray product.
Commitment strategy:
Platforms can make large upfront investments to signal that it’s safe for a group to join the platform. This is common if the users face high switching costs. Ex Microsoft’s launch of the Xbox - committed to spend a lot on promoting the Xbox and sell it at a low price.
Divide-and-conquer pricing strategy:
Two-sided platforms can set diff prices for each group. Divide = “buy” the participation of one group. Conquer = make the other group pay to interact.
How can the platform set prices to ensure that all joins the platform in the Divide and conquer strategy?
Since multiple equilibria is possible where there is both (0,0) and (Ns, Nb), the platform must make sure that (0,0) does not occur. So they have to set prices so that all buyers join even if no sellers join and vice versa. If they can attract one of the group with certainty, they can then raise the price for the other group. They have to choose one “subsidy side” and one “money side”.
In which 4 scenarios is the platform more likely to overcome the chicken-and-egg problem in the divide-and-conquer strategy?
- Stronger total CGNE (high Betas and Ns).
- Larger intrinsic benefits (r)
- Smaller outside options (small u’s).
- Lower marginal costs (small c’s).
Why is observability of the divide-and-conquer strategy important?
Because if the platform chooses to subsidize buyers, the sellers must know that buyers are subsidized, otherwise they will not expect a high Nb and hence the value and attractiveness for the sellers to join (and pay their fee) will not be worth it.
What is a likely outcome of two firms COMPETING with the divide and conquer strategy? (i.e. undifferentiated platforms)
It is likely that they pressure the prices down so much that they drive profits in the market down to zero –> hence only one platform will manage –> the market tips in favor of a single platform.
(also more likely to tip when network effects are strong, just as with the one-sided platforms).
Give example of piggyback strategy (that you tap onto existing network)
For ex what Paypal did on Ebay, they started offering their payment services on Ebay, and then they could expand because the network had reached its critical mass.
Describe the strategy “focus on narrow market”
You start in a small market where you know you can easily build a network. Ex a certain region. Then when it has proven successful, it’s easier to expand.
Describe the strategy “start as a pipeline”
When you have a traditional business where you start integrating one side - for Amazon started with selling books and then invited buyers to make reviews.
Pricing by standard monopoly as an established firm - rearranging the derivative of the profit function leads to a Learner index, what is that?
It is the markup that monopolies can set (a measure of market power that the firm has). This is in turn equal to the inverse elasticity of demand, which we denote 1/n = how much will demand change when prices change?
What does the profit-maximizing fees (P) depend on in an established monopoly?
- the cost of providing access (+c)
- the network benefit that each group exert on the other side of the platform (-vnb, -pins)
- a factor related to the sensitivity of participating on the platform w/r to price (Ns(us)/N’s(us))
How does monopoly platforms adjust their prices with the Lerner index?
Markups are set as if there were lower cost than just c, because we take c minus the benefit that a seller/buyer gets from the presence of the other side. So they internalize the CGNE, because for ex when the seller attracts an extra user on the other side, this generates profits for the platform, and therefore the seller should not pay for this.
Higher elasticity implies…?
Lower margins! So the platform can charge higher prices for the less sensitive side of he platform. –> Platforms relies on an asymmetric fee structure to maximize profits.
Prices tend to be lower on the side of that platform that… (2 things)
- have a higher price-elasticity of participation
2. exterts a larger CGNE on the other side.
Net surplus of a buyer/seller who joins the monopoly platform, us =
For a seller:
us= nb*pi-Ps+rs-thaos
So, the net surplus is the profit they make from each buyer on the platform, minus the access fee, plus the stand alone benefit, minus the opportunity/transport cost of joining the platform.
And the same for buyer but the other way around with the s and b.
The number of buyers/sellers decrease with the price of… ?
With the access fee they have to pay themselves AND the access fee that other side has to pay - because this indirectly reduces the benefit of themselves.