3.2 Changes in public health Flashcards
(109 cards)
How was parliamentry legislation at first?
tentative, with permissive acts that could be accessed should local authorities wish to do so
When did government become committed to public health (PH) and when were acts dealing with Public Health compulsory?
Early years of the 20th century. Clean water and effectice sanitation were no longer optional
Was central or local gov more powerful?
Central gov could legislate for public health, but it was in the localities that it was implemented; when central gov was permissive, a local council could decide to spend money on civic buildings rather than on drains; even PH acts had to be implented by local councils
Why was there a slow change to local and central involvement in public health?
Unprecedented population growth in the 19th century
If local gov had more prominent intervention, did this mean that local authoroties ignored the issue of public health?
No. Pioneering work was done in certain towns and cities by individual medics and admins
Who was behind the formation of the Manchester Board of Health in 1795?
Thomas Perceval and John Ferriar.
Who published reports in Scotland on public health in the early 19th century that prompted authorities to act?
Robert Graham, Robert Cowan and James Cleland
Problems with Scottish reports?
Piecemeal and initaives were only local. Due to diff local admin w/ diff ppl and diff priorities, public health schemes wld collapse
What else was piecemeal?
Private Acts of Parliament secured by local authorities relating to PH.
How many Acts of Parliamnent did London operate under?
In London, there were 300 diff bodies w/ an interest in PH and these operated under 250 Acts of Parliament
How many paving baords did St Pancras have?
The London parish had 16 paving boards, responsible for paving the streets of the parish under 29 Acts of Parliament
What went wrong with St Pancras and the many Acts of Parliament?
Admin nightmare and repeated throughout Britain i.e in Lancashire and Exeter. These allowed commissioners to be elected by ratepayers to deal w/ specific problems depicted by the Acts
What was Vested interests?
The ppl more likely to support a measure if they will benefit frm the measure; they were night soil men to clergy and owners of water companies who were either paid off or represented on the improvement committees themselves.
What did Leeds and Manchester do when taking advantage of their new status under the Municipal Corporations Act?
The Municipal Corporations Act 1835 meant that both towns assumed control of paving, sewerage, street cleaning, and draining. However, they still needed a private Act of Parliament to help them do it, and it was not cheap.
What happened when Liverpool obtained a Sanitary Act in 1846?
The Sanitary Act made the corporation a health authority and empowered it to appoint a medical officer of health. Thus, the town council was given power to carry out improvements to sewerage, drainage, and water supply.
Who was the first medical officer of health in Britain?
WH Duncan (appointed by Liverpol town council)
What overshadowed the immediate implementation of the 1848 PH Act?
Second cholera outbreak that hit Britain. Plus, it was easy for the Act to be undermined so its effectiveness was patchy
Three successes of the PH Act 1848?
Start of 1850 = 192 towns asked for the new ph regulations to be applied & the Act had been applied to 32 of them; by 1853= this rose to 284 petitions & there were 182 towns where the Act was applied; there were town councils that took the Act further through private Acts of Parliament that gave them more sweeping powers
Three failures of the PH Act 1848?
- Lancashire = only 40k of its 2.5 mil ppl were living under some sort of PH board. 2. Of the 187 major towns in the UK, only 29 had the powers of draining & cleansing; 30 had absolutely no powers over PH because powers were in the hands of independent commissionders; 62 had no PH authority whatsover. 3. Local boards of health (BOH) were often j the existing town corporation under a diff guise, so movved slowly, hesistantly, and cautiously.
Why did the PH act od 1848 not have that much impact compared to the Poor Law Amendment Act 1834?
public and gov were not convinved that order needed to be brought into the private Acts relating to PH, no existing structure that cld be reformed; med knowledge was not giving clear msgs, vested interests in water companies, local commissioners scared of losing their job
How was the PH act of 1848 a turning point?
Marked the start of the state’s intervention in PH, and the start of the termination of the need for private Acts of parliament to deliver PH for those whom councils were responsible for. In the years to 1939, increased understanding abt the causes, transmission, and prevention of disease, the pioneering work of individuals and willingness of authorities to support PH initiatives meant PH improved.
What did the health of the poor and vulnerable rely on?
Provision of good quality & cheap housing. Clean water supply, sewerage systemm, and knowledge abt disease transmission meant nothing if the poor lived in overcrowded conditions
What towns and cities inserted clauses into their own Improvement Acts that let them control buildings, sewerage connections, and cellar dwellings?
Leeds & Liverpool in 1842, Manchester in 1844/45, Nottingham and St Helens in 1845, London Metropolitan Building Act 1844 ( all newly constructed buildings within 30 feet of a common sewer to be connected to it.)
Problems with giving city authorities control?
Giving control was not the same as the authority acting; w/o a building inspectorate, 100s of new buildings didn’t conform to the supposed regulations implemented.