Meeus And Raijmaker Flashcards

0
Q

Aim

A

To test the problems with milgrams eg mixed messages of how dangerous the shocks where and Old fashioned violence
To see if it’s cross cultural consistent and stable in time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Procedure, participants

A
39 participants 
News ad
Paid
Modern uni
For stress & performance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Procedure- what participants where told

A

Psy department asked to select candidates for a job.
Had to pass to keep job
real job applicants who didn’t know of the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Participants were ask to…

A

Make negative remarks on how well they were doing on the test
These remarks appeared on a screen in front of the participants during the study.
The participants also were given false info on how stressed the applicants were getting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Procedure- as the test went on…

A

Gave -ve remarks 15 as appeared on screen with applicants stress level, Applicants obv very stressed and 2/3rd through the applicants accused them of giving false Info and withdraw consent.
If participants refused to give more remarks they were told to continue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Findings

A
92% gave all remarks 
No real opposition 
Intensely disliked
Convinced test score was affected by their remarks
96% real situation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conclusion

A

Higher than milgrams, easier to obey psychological violence even if it would lead to permanent harm.
Milgrams was very famous but it made no difference, obedience is higher than ever.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evaluation- Generalisability

A

One country =culture more/less

Only 39- not representative of wide range of obedience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluation- Reliability

A

Lab experiment- controlled, only testing variable they wanted to, if done again same results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluation- validity

A

Face- aim to see obedience in natural situation, they did, though how natural is questioned.
Eco- control, unnatural, diff behaviour
Task- natural as interview, not as participants knew nothing on job, not totally natural behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluation-ethics

A

Deception- to true nature, necessary for success, demand characteristics.
Consent- not fully informed
Protection from harm- stress, 92% had to deal that they psychology abused someone as they had the authority to do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly