Sexual Offences Flashcards

1
Q

Explain Section 127 in relation ‘No presumption because of age’

A

Section 127

There is no presumption of law that a person is incapable of sexual connection because of his or her age.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ingredients for Section 128

A
Sexual Violation by Rape
Section 128(1)a - 20yrs
A person
Rapes 
Another person
***********************************
Sexual Violation by UL SC
Section 128(1)b - 20yrs

A person
Has UL SC
Another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain Section 128A - Allowing sexual activity does not amount to consent in some circumstances

MA FAMILA

M.A.F.A.M.I.L.A

A

Section 128A outlines situations where any apparent consent will not be valid, including, for example:

  1. Where a person SUBMITS to sexual activity AS A RESULT OF FEAR or FORCE, or
  2. Is unaware of the conduct because he or she is ASLEEP or UNCONSCIOUS.
    **********
  3. Lack of protest or resistance
  4. Force, threat or fear of force
  5. Asleep or unconscious
  6. Affected by alcohol or drugs
  7. Intellectual, mental or physical impairment
  8. Mistake as to identity
  9. Mistake as to nature and quality of act
  10. Any other fraudulent representation
    **********
    A lack of protest or resistance does not mean a person is consenting, even if the lack of consent has not been communicated to the defendant; what is relevant is the complainant’s state of mind.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the definition of ‘Rape’ under Section 128(2)?

A
RAPE
Section 128(2)

Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B’s genitalia by person A’s penis,—

(a) without person B’s consent to the connection; AND
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the definition of ‘Unlawful Sexual Connection’ under Section 128(3)?

A
UNLAWFUL SEXUAL CONNECTION
Section 128(3)

Person A has unlawful sexual connection with person B if person A has sexual connection with person B—

(a) without person B’s consent to the connection; AND
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the definition of Sexual Connection?

A

Sexual connection means—

(a) connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise than for genuine medical purposes, of—
(i) a part of the body of another person; or
(ii) an object held or manipulated by another person; or
(b) connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another person’s genitalia or anus; or
(c) the continuation of connection of a kind described in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the ingredients for Attempted Sexual violation - Section 129(1)?

What are the ingredients for Assault with intent to commit Sexual violation - Section 129(2)?

A
ATTEMPTED SEXUAL VIOLATION
Section 129(1) - 10yrs

Every one who attempts to commit sexual violation
*********
ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO COMMIT SEXUAL VIOLATION
Section 129(2) - 10yrs

Every one who assaults another person with intent to commit sexual violation of the other person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define the term ‘genitalia’

A

Genitalia are the external organs of reproduction in males and females. It also includes surgically constructed organs.

As the term literally means the organs of generation, it does not include pubic hair or breasts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In negating consent, the Crown has to prove of 3 things. List the three things.

A

In proving that consent was not present in a case of sexual violation, the Crown must prove that:
− the victim did not consent, or
− the victim’s consent was not valid, or
− the defendant did not believe on reasonable grounds that the victim was consenting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define ‘Penis’

A

Penis includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to a naturally occurring penis (whether the person concerned is male, female, or of indeterminate sex)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the definition of ‘consent’?

Definition and Case Law

A

“Consent” is a person’s conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another”.

R v COX
Consent must be “full, voluntary, free and informed … freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgment”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What makes sexual connection unlawful? (Consent)
What must the Crown Prove
(Subjective and Objective Test)

A

Establishing that sexual connection was unlawful involves a mixed subjective/objective test in relation to consent.
The Crown must prove that:
• the complainant did not consent to the sexual act (a subjective test), AND

  • the offender did not believe the complainant was consenting (a subjective test), OR
  • if he did believe she was consenting, the grounds for such a belief were not reasonable (an objective test).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Case Law

R v Koroheke - Genitalia

A

R v KOROHEKE
The genitalia comprise the reproduction organs, interior and exterior … they include the vulva [and] the labia, both interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Case Law

R v Gutuama
Objective test - reasosable grounds for belief in consent
(hint: Shoes)

A

R v GUTUAMA

Under the objective test the Crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought that [the complainant] was consenting”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Case Law

R v Harpur
Does or omits an act for the purpose of accomplishing his object

A

R v HARPUR

An attempt includes “an act or omission constituting a substantial step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in his commission of the crime”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Case Law

R v Forrest and Forrest
Proof of age

A

R v FORREST and FORREST

“The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of [the victim’s] age.”

17
Q

Case Law

R v Court (Indecency)

A

R v COURT

Indecency means “conduct that right-thinking people will consider an affront to the sexual modesty of [the complainant”

18
Q

Case Law

R v Leeson

A

R v LEESON

The definition of ’indecent assault’ … is an assault accompanied with circumstances of indecency …”

19
Q

Ingredients for Sexual Conduct with child under 12

Section 132

A
Section 132(1)
14yrs
Has Sexual Connection 
With a child <12
*************************************
Section 132(2)
10yrs
Attempts
To have Sexual connection
With a child
20
Q

Definition -

  1. Child
  2. Young Person
A

CHILD

A child means a person <16yrs

21
Q

Ingredients -

Sexual Conduct with a Young Person Under 16
Section 134

A

SEXUAL CONDUCT WITH YOUNG PERSON UNDER 16
Section 134

134(1) - 10yrs
Every one who has SEXUAL CONNECTION with a young person

134(2) - 10yrs
Every one who ATTEMPTS to have SEXUAL CONNECTION with a young person.

134(3) - 7yrs
Every one who DOES AN INDECENT ACT on a young person

22
Q

Ingredients -

Indecent Assault - Section 135

What is the definition of Indecent Assault?

What must the Crown Prove?

Define Indecent Act

A

INDECENT ASSAULT
Section 135 - 7yrs

A person
Indecently assault
Another person.
*******
R v LEESON
“The definition of ’indecent assault’ … is an assault accompanied with circumstances of indecency …”
**
*****
In these cases the Crown must prove that:
• the defendant intentionally assaulted the complainant
• the circumstances accompanying the assault were indecent
• the defendant intended the conduct that a reasonable person would find indecent.
**
*********
‘Indecent act’ is generally accepted as an act accompanied by circumstances of indecency.

23
Q

Ingredients -

Assault on a child or MAF - Section 194

A

Section 194 - 2yrs

194(a) Assaults any child under the age of 14 years;

194(b) Being a male, assaults any female.

24
Q

Ingredients -

Ill-treatment OR neglect of child or vulnerable adult - Section 195

A

Section 195
195(1 - 10yrs

  1. Being a person described in subsection (2)
  2. Intentionally engages in conduct that, OR omits to discharge or perform any legal duty the omission of which, is likely to cause suffering, injury, adverse effects to health, or any mental disorder or disability to a child or vulnerable adult (the victim) if the conduct engaged in, or the omission to perform the legal duty, is a major departure from the standard of care to be expected of a reasonable person.
    (2) The persons are—
    (a) a person who has actual care or charge of the victim; or
    (b) a person who is a staff member of any hospital, institution, or residence where the victim resides.
    (3) For the purposes of this section and section 195A, a child is a person under the age of 18 years.
25
Q

Ingredients -

Section 195A

A

Section 195A imposes criminal liability in some situations where it is known a child (or vulnerable adult) is at risk of harm but where no action is taken.
The offence applies to:
• members of the same household as the victim
• people who are staff members of any hospital, institution or residence where the victim resides.
Criminal liability will arise if such a person has frequent contact with a child (or vulnerable adult) and:
• knows (mens rea) the victim is at risk of death, grievous bodily harm or sexual assault as a result of the acts or omissions of another person; and
• fails (actus reus) to take reasonable steps to protect the victim from that risk.

26
Q

Discuss the statutory defence for s134A – sexual conduct with a young person under 16 years.

A

There is a statutory defence for sexual conduct with a young person (s134A). This statutory defence applies only when:
− the person charged can show they took reasonable steps to establish the young person was aged 16 or over, and
− the person charged believed on reasonable grounds that the young person was aged 16 or over, and
− the young person consented to that sexual connection.

27
Q

Definition -

  1. Introduction
A

INTRODUCTION
The legislation uses the term “introduction into” in the definition of sexual connection, and “penetration” in the definition of rape.

28
Q

How can Proof of Penetration be established?

A

Proof of penetration may be established by:
• the complainant’s evidence
• medical examination, including physical injuries and DNA evidence
• the defendant’s admissions.

29
Q

Explain the subjective and objective test in relation to consent.

A

SUBJECTIVE TEST
If it is established that the complainant was not consenting, the next question is WHETHER or NOT THE DEFENDANT BELEIVED he/she was consenting at the time. This is a purely subjective test from the defendant’s point of view, i.e. what was the defendant thinking at the time?

If he/she did believe he/she was consenting, an objective test must then be applied to determine whether there was a reasonable basis for his/her belief.
********
OBJECTIVE TEST
The objective test is: WHAT WOULD A REASONABLE PERSON have believed if placed in the same position as the defendant?

If a reasonable person would, in the same circumstances, have believed the complainant was consenting, the jury may well acquit the defendant. If a reasonable person would not have believed he/she was consenting, the jury is more likely to convict.

30
Q

Ingredients for Section 134

Sexual Conduct with young person under 16

A

.

31
Q

Case Law

R v Cox - consent
R v Gutuama

A

R v COX
Consent must be “full, voluntary, free and informed … freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgment”.
********
In R v Gutuama a 27-year-old man was charged with raping a 14-year-old girl following a period of consensual sexual activity. He claimed he had reasonable grounds for believing she was still consenting, prompting the Court of Appeal to clarify the objective test for reasonableness.

R v GUTUAMA
Under the objective test the Crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought that [the complainant] was consenting”.

32
Q

Definition - Sexual Violation

A

In general terms, sexual violation is non-consensual sexual connection with another person.

Section 128B of the Crimes Act 1961 creates the offence of sexual violation, while s128(1) defines it in two classes:
• Sexual Violation by Rape.
• Sexual Violation by Unlawful Sexual Connection.

“Rape” is a specific form of sexual violation that involves the non-consensual penetration of the complainant’s genitalia by the offender’s penis.

“Unlawful Sexual Connection” has a wider meaning, and includes any form of non-consensual penetration or oral connection with a person’s genitalia or anus.

33
Q

Rape Section 128(2)

A

Section 128, Crimes Act 1961
Sexual violation defined

(2) Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B’s genitalia by person A’s penis,—
(a) without person B’s consent to the connection; and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.