Company Specialities Flashcards

1
Q

What are the rules on registration of company charges?

A

NB the rules on Registration of charges changed on the 6 April 2013 and therefore the textbooks fail to cover this. However the rules largely replicate the rules that have been in existence in Scots law since the early 1960s. Thus for the purposes of the exam just refer to the current rules.

The provisions were inserted by statutory instrument into the Companies Act 2006 s 859A onwards [must read this**]. Part 25 is most important. So this section applies when you have a charge and requires that you register it within a certain period….unless there is a court order that makes it longer.

The 2006 Act has a requirement that securities granted by a company require to be registered.
Registration not of “charge” itself but of “particulars.”

This requirement is additional to general law. So eg standard security by company must be registered twice: (1) Land Register (or GRS); (2) Company Register. Latter must be within 21 days. Sanction: nullity. But Court can authorise late registration. However, they will not do so if the debtor company is insolvent – see Salvesen, Petrs [2009] CSOH 161 http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2009CSIH161.html (although note speciality that these charges were created in England by a Scottish company)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

*s 859A

A

This section applies where a company or LLP makes a ‘charge’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

s 859A (7)

A

a charge is either a standard security, a floating charge or an assignation in security[ But don’t worry about this too much. Despite the fact that an assignation in security is not an asset in the strict sense.], and any other right of security which constitutes such in the law of Scotland…(but not including a pledge)
⁃ Since it applies where a company creates a charge the lien and landlord’s hypothec are not covered by these provisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

s 859A(2)

A

the registrar must register the charge in the Companies Register within 21 days beginning with the day after the date of creation of the charge (s 859A(3))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

*s 859E

A

⁃ The day of creation of the charge is determined in *s 859E in which there is a table.
⁃ A standard security is created on the date of its recording in the Register of Sasines or its Registration in the Land Register of Scotland.[ This means that for standard securities you must DOUBLE REGISTER. First in the Land register/ Sasines then in the Companies Register.

If you fail to DOUBLE REGISTER then the standard security is VOID. (s 859H(3)

Very important!!!!!!]
*******[This means that a standard security created by a company needs to be registered twice (in the land register and in the companies register)].

⁃ A floating charge - probably the date of execution (s 859/s859(E) is not clear but this was the common law position).
- [Nick Greir takes the view that the floating charge takes effect on the date of execution — we do not know. The safest option is to choose the earlier date].
The Registrar issues a certificate of registration which contains a unique identification code, and is conclusive evidence that the requirements of registration have been complied with: 2006 Act, s 859I.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happens if the charge is not registered?

A

⁃ If the charge is not registered in the Companies register within the 21 day period then the charge is void (s 859H(3)). “void … against

(a) a liquidator of the company;
(b) an administrator of the company; and
(c) a creditor of the company”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Can you do anything to remedy the situation if you miss the 21 day period?

A

S 859H provides that where a company commits a charge and they are not delivered before the end of the relevant period…must register twice within 21 days or it ceases to have effect and the loan becomes a personal right.

  • NB Under s 859F (2)(a) of the 2006 Act the court can[ But it is extremely uncommon.] extend the period for delivery if satisfied that failure to register “(i) was accidental or due to inadvertence or to some other sufficient cause, or (ii) is not of a nature to prejudice the position of creditors or shareholders of the company”. The court has a residual power to allow late registration where it “is just and equitable to grant relief”.
  • Must show cause to the court.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the other issues on registration of charges?

A

⁃ 1) When the charge is discharged of if you are releasing property from the security, you must register this in the Companies Register too (s 859L)
⁃ 2) Double registration may become a thing of the past in the future since *s 893 (saviour in the legislation) of the Act provides that the Secretary of State can make a statutory instrument which allows registration in one register to be equivalent to registering in another. BUT the secretary of state has not done so.
• Not clear if this provision will ever be used (but good news for trainees who will only have to register once).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are floating charges?

A

Floating charges originated in English law. It is granted over the entire asset base of the company. This is in effect a creation of English equity. Equity, in english law, (“look at what you could have won”) the law will protect your position where you have not gone through certain procedural hoops (e.g. where a person contracts to buy this protects them). Equity is about trying to be fair to the parties and floating charge is about protection against every creditor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What introduced floating charges?

A

They were introduced in Scotland by the Companies (Floating Charges) (S) Act 1961.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Where is the current law on floating charges found?

A

The current law on floating charges in found in the Companies Act 1985[ Primarily ss 462, 463, 464, 466]. There is a set of provisions in the Bankruptcy and Diligence Act which were passed in 2007 but have not been brought into force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who can grant a floating charge?

A

⁃ Companies, LLPs or ‘miscellaneous others’ (not too important).
- Must be registered in Companies Register

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the creation of floating charges governed by?

A
s 462(1) of the Companies Act 1985. [Must read**]
⁃	"It is competent under the law of Scotland for an incorporated company (whether a company within the meaning of this Act or not), for the purpose of securing any debt or other obligation (including a cautionary obligation) incurred or to be incurred by, or binding upon, the company or any other person, to create in favour of the creditor in the debt or obligation a charge, in this Part referred to as a floating charge, over all or any part of the property (including uncalled capital) which may from time to time be comprised in its property and undertaking[ "Property and undertaking" seems to be a concept which is narrower than 'property'.

To explain this, if you were to say you can grant a floating charge over all the assets you own and other things - this would suggest you could grant a security over things you don’t own which goes against nemo dat quod non habet. This will be considered in more detail later when looking at Sharp v Thomson.].”

⁃ The floating charge is fluid which means assets can enter and exit. The floating charge crystallises when the company goes bust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How do you create a floating charge?

A

⁃ It must be registered within 21 days (invisibility period) [ It exists but it is not on the register]of the date of creation (which is probably the date of execution: see above s 859A and s 859E - 2006 Act).
- The floating charge would be void against the receiver, administrator liquidator etc.

“Property and undertaking” of company = everything in patrimony. But can be less, eg all corporeal moveables.
Can be for all sums.
Can affect heritable property without need to register in GRS or LR.
Assets disposed freed of charge without juridical act of creditor.
Assets acquired subjected to charge without juridical act of debtor.
Not a real right before attachment.
Becomes real right on attachment: National Commercial Bank v Telford 1969 SC 181

There is no prescribed form on how to create a floating charge - you can use any form you like.

  • Usually the company will expressly provide that “we…do hereby grant a floating charge (mirror wording within s642). This deed is prepared and sign by the company and the floating charge then has to be registered within 21 days of the date of creation.
  • Possible Reform? The BAD Act - makes various proposed changes to the law of floating charges but they are unlikely to happen (see p.25 in handbook) for information only.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Is a floating charge a real right?

A

Not at the time of creation. It only becomes a real right on attachment (made clear by the case of National Commercial Bank v Telford 1969)

  • The creditor gets a right in the assets of the debtor, meaning that the asset is subject to the rights in security and the creditor has a right in the property.

“Property and undertaking” of company = everything in patrimony. But can be less, eg all corporeal moveables.
Can be for all sums.
Can affect heritable property without need to register in GRS or LR.
Assets disposed freed of charge without juridical act of creditor.
Assets acquired subjected to charge without juridical act of debtor.
Not a real right before attachment.
Becomes real right on attachment: National Commercial Bank v Telford 1969 SC 181

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When does a floating charge attach?

A

⁃ A floating charge attaches in one of three ways (on attachment, the creditor gets a real right in security):
⁃ 1) Company is liquidated -(on winding up) floating charge automatically attached. (s 463 Companies Act 1985 (s 45 BAD Act))
⁃ 2) If the company goes into receiver[ receivership is the principle mechanism for the enforcement of a floating charge up to 15 September 2003 - any charge created before this, the principle mechanism was receivership. it was the floating charge holder could say if the debtor had breached the loan agreement, the creditor could then say that they appoint a receiver and the receiver replaces the manager of the company. Receiver became agent/representative of the company but they did not become an agent of the floating charge holder. So they effectively served two masters (creditor and ??).]ship and there is a floating charge created before the 15th September 2003[ Not sure the significance of this case.] then the moment the receiver is appointed the floating charge is attached. (s 53(7) Insolvency Act 1986).
⁃ 3)[ This virtually never happens ] If the company goes into administration the floating charge will only attach in Scotland if the administrator has reviewed the assets of the company and decided there is not enough to pay the creditor and notified company house. When the company registrar is told that there is not enough to pay the creditors, at that point the floating charge attaches : para 115(3) of Schedule B1 Insolvency Act 1986.

If the creditor wishes to ensure that the floating charge can be fully enforced then it should contain a statement that para 14 of Sch B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 applies to it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the effect of attachment of the floating charge?

A

⁃ Under the Insolvency Act s 53(7), everything which is subject to the charge at the time of attachment is caught by it.
⁃ Such attachment has effect “as if it were a fixed security” over the property to which it has attached. This is actually giving a subordinate real right (concept jumbling). The key thing however (often missed in exam) (usually set as an exam question!!!) is that a floating charge attaches to every asset so you must consider every individual asset. You need to think about the effect on each individual asset in competition with other creditors**.
⁃ This is referred to as the statutory hypothesis - this is that the floating charge attaches in relation to every individual piece of property as if it were the default security which could be granted over that property.
⁃ So a floating charge attaches to land and buildings as if it were a standard security.
⁃ A floating charge attaches to moveable property as if it were a pledge.
⁃ A floating charge attaches to incorporeal property as if it were an assignation in security. This was clarified in the Forth and Clyde case — treated not as a transfer of personal rights but as an assignation in the security of the property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

When can a receiver be appointed?[ Not 100% clear about this - look up textbook.]

A

If the floating charge was granted before the 15th September 2003 then a receiver can be appointed. The appointment of a receiver is typically based on the terms of the floating charge itself - the floating charge will indicate various grounds on which it is breached and which justify the receiver being appointed.
⁃ These grounds will typically include non-payment of the debt. The receiver goes in and replaces the manager of the company and takes over the management of the company. The purpose is to realise assets to make sure that the floating charge holder gets paid.
⁃ This is an odd mode of enforcement of rights in security since in most modes of enforcement the creditor gets a right to sell the asset. But this is because in relation to a floating charge a creditor has no power of sale - the power of the creditor is a power to change the management of the company - this is either by putting a receiver in place (if granted before 15th September 2003) or putting an administrator in place (if granted on or after 15th September 2003).
⁃ This power means that the prior management can no longer make managerial decisions in relation to the company.[ Not 100% clear about this - look up textbook.]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

**Read Companies Act 1985, s 462: “

A

“It is competent under the law of Scotland for an incorporated
company….comprised in its property and undertaking”.
So this section tells us (1) competency (2) it can only be granted by a incorporated company (3) to
secure a debt incurred [so far fits with the broad approach to rights in security generally].

Company can “create in favour of the creditor in the debt or obligation a charge…” Charge is not
defined within the Companies Act 1965. A charge is not a term of art in relation to securities in Scots Law.

But a charge is a term of Art in English law - it is a right in security.

You can create a floating charge over all of the assets comprised in property and undertaking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What can you not have a charge over?

A

You cannot have a charge over: (1) property you have conveyed (2) given up an asset for (3) that you do not own (not registered). But the court held in Sharp v Thomson that this house was not covered by the floating charge. It doesn’t apply to all the things owned by the debtor business. There is a temporal aspect - future assets acquired by the business are also subject to the floating charge.

NB the floating charge always applies to land but it is not registered in the land register. It covers all moveable and heritable and corporeal and incorporeal property (covers everything (Sainsburys bottle of water example)).

21
Q

What is the general rule about floating charges granted after 15th September 2003?

A

Floating charges granted after 15th September 2003 may not be able to be enforced by the appointment of receiver: Enterprise Act 2002 (although some excluded categories of floating charge will still permit receivership).

22
Q

What does the Enterprise Act provide in relation to unsecured creditors?

A

Provides that a “prescribed part” of assets falling under charge must be available for unsecured creditors (on which see SI 2003/2097) – see s 176A of the Insolvency Act 1986 (as inserted by the Enterprise Act 2002).

23
Q

What is ranking on attachment?

A

⁃ Since the floating charge is a non-possessory security, there is potential for multiple securities over the asset. Thus it can rank in competition with e.g. a pledge even though the debtor company doesn’t have possession of the asset (i.e. what is caught by the floating charge is based on ownership, not possession).

24
Q

*** Companies Act 1985 Act s 464

A

[ This is horrendously complicated. ]

25
Q

s463

A

[Must read these sections and be familiar with].

26
Q

s 464(2)

A

??

27
Q

Does the lien rank above the floating charge?

A

Yes, always.

28
Q

Insolvency Act 1986 s 60

A

??

29
Q

Enterprise Act 2002 Part 10.

A

??

30
Q

Where are the rules on ranking on attachment found?

A

The rules on ranking are found in s 463, 464 of the Companies Act 1985[ For liquidation

Must read these sections - especially 464.], s 60 of the Insolvency Act 1986[ For receivership]

31
Q

What is the relationship between floating charge and unsecured creditors?

A

⁃ Generally a floating charge ranks above all unsecured creditors.
⁃ However there are two discrete categories of unsecured creditors who rank about floating charge holders (but they rank after other secured creditors):

32
Q

What are preferential creditors?

A

⁃ These are unpaid employees. You get paid your outstanding wages before the floating charge holder receives anything.
- Up to 2003 the tax man (HMRC) was a preferential creditor (this is no longer**).

33
Q

What is the prescribed part?

A

This will ALWAYS rank before the floating charge.

s 176A Insolvency Act 1986 (see p. 699 Company’s Statutes).
⁃ For floating charges created on or after 15th September 2003, a special fund is put aside so that unsecured creditors will get part of the money before the floating charge holders get anything. NB these unsecured creditors get paid after other secured creditors, but before the floating charge holder(s).
⁃ [This was introduced because the floating charge is so powerful.]

34
Q

Where is the prescribed part specified?

A

The prescribed part is specified in the ‘Insolvency Act 1986 (Prescribed Part) Order 200 (S1 2003/2097)’:
⁃ If net property £10,000 prescribed part is 50% of the first £10,000 and 20% of excess
⁃ The max value of the prescribed part is £600,000. [Read this**].

35
Q

How do quasi-securities rank?

A

⁃ These also ALWAYS rank before the floating charge.
- This is where the creditor owns the asset or is the beneficiary in a trust.
⁃ If the creditor owns the asset[ E.g. on the basis of a retention of title clause.] and the debtor is the company then the floating charge cannot attach to the asset - it can’t attach to assets that the debtor doesn’t own. The creditor can simply come and take the asset away because they own the asset.
⁃ [Really obvious point!]

36
Q

Which case is relevant in relation to trusts?

A

⁃ In relation to trusts. Sharp v Thomson is relevant - a company sold a house to Mr + Mrs Thomson. They paid the price, got a disposition and moved in but never registered. The floating charge attached before they registered the disposition. Applying the principle that floating charges attach as if it is a fixed security then it should attach as if a standard security and since it attached before the property was registered the property should have been caught.
⁃ But the HL held that in the situation where the buyer has paid the price, has moved in and has a delivered deed, the seller no longer has ‘beneficial interest’ in the property and thus the floating charge cannot attach.

37
Q

How is ‘beneficial interest’ relevant to trusts?

A

⁃ The only other area where the idea of ‘beneficial interest’ is relevant is in trusts - this means that where the trustee is holding property for the beneficiary the company may be owner of the asset as trustee but they don’t have beneficial interest so the floating charge will not attach to the asset - the beneficiaries personal right will take priority over the floating charge holder (confirmed by the case of Tay Valley).

38
Q

Tay Valley

A

This case hints that if the debtor company is holding assets as trustee for someonee else, then the beneficiary takes priority over the floating charge, it always ranks after the prescribed part and creditors who have a right of retention, and after the beneficiary of a trust.

39
Q

What is effectively executed diligence?

A

Effectually executed diligence (floating charge ranks after this as well — we will cover this section in the diligence lecture).
⁃ Effectually executed diligence takes priority over a floating charge (s 463 Companies Act 1985, s 60 Insolvency Act 1986).
⁃ Effectually executed diligence is explained in the case of Lord Advocate v RBS - will be discussed later (but note that the definition is very narrow). See two articles by AJ Sim and Wortley (2000). Also look at Green’s Law Basics “100 cases” book on LA v RBS.

40
Q

s 464 Companies Act 1985

A

⁃ s 464(1[ This expressly allows the creditor to require the debtor to regulate ranking. they can make a provision in the floating charge which effectively says “this floating charge comes first”.

NB textbook look at s464(4) and ignore negative pledge clause. in reality every creditor puts a negative pledge clause in, or else their floating charge will rank after creditors, whereas if you do then your floating charge gets paid before any security created after it. ]

Usually in practice it is implied.

The clause creates a surplus of
]) - allows a floating charge to include a provision which prevents the debtor granting any other securities. If this occurs then this provision overrides the rules in the rest of the section. This is called a negative pledge clause. [ A clause which you put in a right of security saying (a) you cannot grant any other securities unless we agree (b) if you do, they have to rank after us (the floating charge which contains a negative pledge) ]In practice this is ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS USED.
⁃ Once there is a negative pledge clause, any security that is made a real right after the floating charge is created will rank after the floating charge.
⁃ Example: On day 1, A ltd grants a standard security to BoS but this is not immediately registered. On day 2 A ltd grant a floating charge with a negative pledge clause in favour or RBS. The date of execution of the floating charge is the date on which it (including the negative pledge clause) becomes effective. This means that if on day 3 the BoS register the standard security then they are too late since it has only been made a real right after the floating charge has been created and thus it ranks later.

41
Q

*AIB Finance v BoS 1995

A

⁃ The exact situation immediately above occurred. The floating charge ranked first. Leading case on when a negative pledge applies, in this case:
- On day one the debtor company grants a standard security in favour of the bank C.
- On day two the debtor company grants a floating charge in favour of a second bank. This floating charge contains a negative pledge clause.
- On day three bank C’s standard security is registered and both are registered within the appropriate 21 day period (within 21 days of the standard security being made a real right).
- This means that in the above example, the floating charge is effective in Day 2. And the
negative pledge clause is effective from day 2 of the negative pledge clause. A fixed security which is created after the floating charge is created will rank after the floating charge is created. But when is the date of creation of the standard security? It is granted, signed and delivered on day 1 but it is not registered in the land Register until Day 2. AIB holds that the standard security is created when it is registered, this means that the priorty day for the floating charge is day 2 but the priority day for the standard security is day 3 - so Bank A will be paid before Bank C.
- So it is when it becomes a real right what matters.
- Bank C cannot rely on the offside goals rule to circumvent this.
- But note that a fixed security always ranks above the unsecured creditor. These get paid after secure creditors. They have a right in security which gives them priority. There are two types of unsecured creditor which are potentially relevant here — bank C should be paid before the prescribed part.
- So because bank C has a standard security it will rank above the prescribed part. They also rank before employees. But we know that the floating charge ranks after all preferential creditors and after the prescribed part since s464(6) expressly provides this and brings in the preferential creditor rule.
- NB it is a circle of ranking which cannot be broken and these statutory rules clash and create this circle of priority.
⁃ But what happens in these circumstances in relation to the prescribed part (above). Under s 176A the prescribed part is paid before the floating charge. But the floating charge is paid before the standard security. And the standard security gets paid before the prescribed part. This means that each of these right holders has a separate claim to being paid first (there is a circle of priorities which has been created by the legislation).

42
Q

What is the status of unpaid employees?

A

Similarly the unpaid employees[ NB some textbooks still say that the taxman is a preferential creditor but this is no longer the case.] as preferential creditors are paid before the floating charge holder. Thus there is also a circle of creditors in this scenario too.

⁃ [So there are two potential circles of priority created by the legislation!!!!]

43
Q

How is the problem of circularity solved?

A

No case-law in Scotland.
⁃ In England there are two cases:
⁃ One held that the floating charge holder takes priority. The other case held that the unpaid employees take priority.

44
Q

s 464(2)

A

implied securities (lien and landlord’s hypothec) ALWAYS take priority over a floating charge, whether or not they are created before or after the floating charge.

45
Q

s 464(4)

A

This section sets out the default rules which NEVER APPLY IN PRACTICE since it is defeated by the negative pledge clause which always is included in practice. So in essence this is negotiated away.

46
Q

What does a charge have priority over (summary)?

A

Charge has priority over:
⁃ (1) Ordinary unsecured creditors, except for the “prescribed part” (for Floating charges created after 15 September 2003- s 176A Insolvency Act 1986 (inserted by Enterprise Act 2002, s 252)
⁃ (2) Subsequent floating charges: 1985 Act s 464(4)(b).
⁃ (3) Subsequent ordinary (“fixed”) securities but only if charge contains clause under s 464(1) (negative pledge clause: see AIB Finance Ltd v Bank of Scotland 1995 SLT 2 – virtually all do)

47
Q

What is a charge postponed to (summary)

A

⁃ (1) Prior ordinary securities.
⁃ (2) Later ordinary securities, subject to s 464(1). See above.
⁃ (3) Tacit securities, whether prior or not.
⁃ (4) Preferential creditors (a curious regime with strange consequences – what or who are the preferential creditors?)
⁃ (5) “Effectually executed diligence.” Ld Adv v RBS 1977 SC 155. Sim 1984 SLT (News) 25 and Wortley 2000 JR 325 (articles in e-reading box on class website)

48
Q

What is the forthcoming law (FOR INFORMATION ONLY)?

A

The law will be amended by Part 2 of the Bankruptcy and Diligence etc (Scotland) Act 2007 (if this ever comes into force – which looks increasingly unlikely). This provides new rules for creation and ranking.

Note that the regime to be introduced by the 2007 Act contradicts some aspects of the 2006 Act and that tying the two together will be difficult. The Registers of Scotland are liaising with Companies House and the DTI to discuss the dovetailing of the regimes. However, there is no resolution to a number of disputes as yet.

A new register is being introduced: the Register of Floating Charges: s 37, 2007 Act. In this the company will register the charge, not the particulars.
When will floating charges be created under the 2007 Act? See s 38. From date of registration of Floating charge unless an advance notice of floating charge was registered in the 21 days before registration of the charge itself (see s 39).

The new ranking regime is very similar to the old one (see s 40 and s 45). The legislation does not impact on administration or receivership and the consequences of liquidation are now dealt with by s 45.
The biggest change is that s 40 of the 2007 Act introduces a default negative pledge clause, and the prescribed part and preferential creditors will rank above the floating charge. The coincidence of these two elements leads to some problems.

The problems regarding effectually executed diligence &c remain (to some extent)

49
Q

What are the criticisms of floating charges?

A

Technical. “A floating charge is utterly repugnant to the principles of Scots law.” Carse v Coppen 1951 SC 233 per Lord President.
Equitable. In insolvency seldom anything left for ordinary unsecured creditors.
Economic. Gives too great a power to bank. Encourages bad lending. Dries up other credit lines. In bankruptcy, shifts losses from strong to weak.
International. Floating charge purports to operate extraterritorially.

For criticism see the articles by Gretton at 1984 SLT (News) 172 and 1986 SLT (News) 325. (see e-reading folder on class website) There is also a very good article by Cabrelli 2005 EdinLR 407. These are not essential to read.