The cognitive approach - Loftus and Palmer(1) Flashcards

1
Q

What is the aim of Loftus and Palmer? EXPERIMENT ONE

A

To investigate how information supplied after an event influences a witness’s memory for that event
To investigate language on memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What do early/prior studies show?

A

That memories are not accurate record of our experience. We try and fit past events into existing representations to make memories more coherent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the IV?

A

Changing the wording of the critical question, (which verb condition the subject was tested in.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the critical question? NUMBER

A

question 4 - Others being distractor questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the Dv

A

The mean speed estimate in miles per hour per condition and this giving a quantitative measure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the sample?

A

45 students - University of Washington seattle.
AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT
5 conditions tested in with 9 people in each

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the 5 conditions?

A

Smashed, Collided, Bumped, Hit, Contacted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Analogy to remember the conditions?

A

So Could Be Holidays Couldn’t (it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What type of experiment was Loftus and Palmer?

A

Lab

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the results of the conditions?

A
SMASHED = 40.8
COLLIDED= 39.3
BUMPED = 38.1
HIT = 34.0
CONTACTED = 31.8
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what do the results show?

A

They demonstrate the phrasing of the question brought about a change in speed estimate. (The more dramatic the word the higher the speed the pps put down.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How many videos did the participants watch?

A

7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the strengths ?

A
  1. ) Based in a lab,variables controlled, cause and effect established.
  2. )Quantitative data gathered - easy to analyse
  3. )Use of films standardised the experiment.
  4. ) PPS randomly assigned to experimental groups to reduce bias.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the weaknesses?

A
  1. )Isn’t a big enough sample size, represent wider population.
  2. )External Validity= findings of study low in population validity.
  3. )Leading questions can distort memory.
  4. )Controlled conditions= low ecological validity
  5. )Accidents happen spontaneously in the real world so memory would be affected compared to the video.
  6. )Under stress in real life
  7. )Fatigue and order effects
  8. ) Response bias - forced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What could be improved?

A
  1. )Use a bigger range of words

2. ) Use a bigger sample size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly