Chapter 2 - Resiliance Flashcards

1
Q

Latin term?

A

Resilire- bounce back.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

PR - Garmezy (1971)

A

Mothers with severe schizophrenia:

  • peer and teacher reports
    (one negatively affected subset)
    (One competent/normally developing subset)

Identified differentiating RFs.

= attributes: relations, acedemic, commitment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

PR Werner, 1989 Kuali longitudinal study.

A

N= 700

201 identified at risk children, Hawaii.

72 developed competently/normally.

Attributes: temperaments, self confidence, motivation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did PR invulnerability suggest?

A

That some children were constitutionally tough- didn’t give in or way to adversive situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Masten (2006) determine?

A

Resilience/invulnerability is not a fixed quality.

It fluctuates and varies throughout a persons development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did newly adapted research aim to do?

A

No longer deficit approach- now psychopathology.

Looking at positive outcomes and adaptive functioning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Difference between protective and vulnerability factors?

A

Keyes, 2009: PF modify and frotect the pathway of deve. outcome.

Newman, 2004: VF renders a person more susceptible to a threat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Project competence?

A

Masten, 1995

205 Minneapolis school children

7,10,20 yrs

Supported protective factors!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the definition of resilience? (Hunter, 2012)

A

Manifesting adaptive or competent functioning in spite of being exposed to high levels of risk/adversity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who said resilience is not an individual trait- but a process.

A

Luther, 2000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Masten (2000) determined there were 10 PFs. Who categorised it?

A

Haneworld, 2011

3 categories: individual, family, community.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Adverse conditions are arguably?

A

Vulnerability factors.

The resilience and combination of PFs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hetherington’s (1999) study?

A

Studied children of divorce.

Resilience= temperament, low inter parental conflict, nurturant parenting and social support.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ward’s (2007) study?

A

Community violence.

Resilience and PFs= family support, cohesion, school support.

It’s multidimensional! = resilience in some domains and not others. (Supports Willms)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Jaffee’s 2007 study?

A

906,000 maltreated children

Maltreatment- very potent RF

Measures: parental supports and welfare involvement.
(Not reliable! Needs multi informants)

For MD- resilience had to be seen over T1 and T2.
(Only 3%! Even with stringent criteria)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Criticism of Jaffee’s study?

A

No severity/chronicity measure.

17
Q

So is reliance multi-dimensional in individual differences?

A

It’s not an all or nothing phenomenon.

It’s inconsistent across domains.

18
Q

Who discovered inner distress?

A

Farber, (1987)

Maltreated children showed some resilient behaviour.

But also inner distress.

19
Q

What did Luther (1993) examine?

A

Provided evidence to support Farber’s work.

Inner city youth, n=140

3 measures: Sch/soc competence, sch achievement, emotional distress.

Vulnerable to emotional distress!

20
Q

What did Roberts (2004) conclude?

A

Resilience depends upon other people and other systems of influence.

21
Q

How many methodological issues are there?

A

9!

Definitions, subjective, multidimensional, integration, PF correlates, prospective studies, age groups, minority groups, consensus.