3.9 - Business growth Flashcards
(144 cards)
explain why Larger businesses are more stable than small businesses.
§ Business size- revenue, profit, market share, number of employees, assets. When a business grows, these increase.
§ An increase in sales volume and revenue – greater profits= re-invested – stimulate more growth
§ Bigger market share- business has more influence . high market share- influence to control prices
§ Larger businesses benefit from E.O.S and economies of scope- lower unit costs
§ Bigger businesses – range of products or service- adapt to market changes. Businesses change- increase dividends
state and explain types of economies of scale
rts
experience curve issues
Old- 1966
§ Complacency- Market leaders
§ Experiences vs resistance to
change
§ Labour efficiency- less wate
§ Labour specialisation
§ Advances in capital
§ Input mix
External economies of scale makes a whole industry or area more efficient
Occurs when industries are more concentrated in small geographical areas
§ Having large number of suppliers to choose from gives E.O.S. locating near lots of suppliers- negotiate with a
range – increase quality and reduce prices
§ A good skilled local labour supply – industry more efficient. Most imp for industries where training is expensive
Experience curve:
As a business grows – increases its
experiency = inc. efficiency = cost per unit to decrease. BTE
§ Cost adv porters generic strategy
§ Lower prices- MS inc
§ Monopoly BTE- inc price. E.O.S
§ Lower costs. MAX MS
The impact of growth or retrenchment on the functional areas of the business
rts
expl. Economies of scope- more variety is cheaper
why it is cheaper
Business produced multiple products instead of specialising in one- cheaper for one business to produce many
products. Extending product range, specialist expertise or competency, current equipment, where similar raw
mat inputs, distribution, logistics
§ Maximise use of resources. Share expertise. ADV- spread risk
§ Business that have people/ infrastructure = more efficient at producing an additional product. Able to expand
the production dept without having to expand other dept- unit costs decrease
§ Existing businesses benefit from brand loyalty- know the brand, more likely to buy other products they make
§ Economies of scope- charge lower prices due to lower unit costs= comp adv – force rivals out the market
expl. Diseconomies of scale
expl. retrenchment
may be necessary to remain profitable. Often due to D.E.O.S, declining markets, economic
recession. improved competitor performance, low ROCE, high gearing, failed takeover to survive
Retrenchment means that business will have to downsize in some areas. Achieved by:
§ Cutting jobs- sales are decreasing, business decrease its wage bill by cutting jobs- reduce labour costs
§ Reducing output- selling fewer units- reduce output and capacity- reduce costs
§ Withdrawing from markets- businesses cost to stop selling in less profitable market
§ Splitting the business up (de merging) easier to manage and control a smaller business, might split up into
several smaller ones and focus on making each one profitable
§ Reduce product portfolio- reduce losses from a particular product being unprofitable
1. Retrenchment affects workers- if a business retrenches too quickly (e.g. a recession), impact on workers is
significant- lead to decreased productivity- problem even worse (may)
2. Leave unprofitable markets due to low ROCE. Leave market due to economic downturn. Reduce D.E.O.S. Focus
on core competencies
Problem with Retrenchment:
Lose gain from E.O.S/ economies of scope if product portfolio Is reduced
§ Lose gains from experience curve If redundancy issues- less corporate
knowledge- increase avg cost p/u
§ Reduce motivation. Wider impact on stakeholders.
Why firms restrict growth or retrench:
Maintain culture of small business.
Conflicts between shareholders
and owners
§ Business will become too
complicated to manage
§ Growth required additional
financial resources
§ May not want to strain cash flow
Impact of retrenchment:
Finance- ease cash flow issues, generate cash to reduce gearing/ debt
§ Less focus on e/r fluctuations – support cost cutting
§ Operations- E.OS- depends on positioning to min efficient scale. Capacity utilisation- high =efficient
§ HR- impact organisational structure. Delayering-flatter structure- motivational gains Redundancy package.
Depends on which staff have been made redundant
§ Marketing- reduce product portfolio, pricing strategies, distributional channels
The scale and scope of retrenchment can have limited or significant changes.
§ Small-scale, incremental retrenchment has only limited impact
§ Significant retrenchment is often associated with a fundamental reappraisal of the business
Common Actions & Possible Implications for Change
rts
Organic growth (internal growth) means increasing production scale:
: investing and employing more resources
§ Growth as a result of a firms increasing capacity through retained profit- increasing output - building a larger
factory, hiring more workers, increasing raw mat, product portfolio, distribution channel or outlets, overseas
expansion. Offshoring, outsourcing, e-commerce
+ve organic growth
a firm has control over exactly how this growth occurs, less risk than inorganic growth (risk – averse)
§ Integration is expensive, time-consuming, evidence suggesting that the long-term share price of the company falls
following integration. Maintain current management style, culture
§ Existing shareholders retain control over firm, reduce conflicts in objectives. No divorce of ownership and con
§ Firms grow by building upon their strengths and using own funds, retained profits, fund the growth. Firm is not
building up debt- growth is more sustainable
§ Less disruptive changes- workers efficiency, productivity, morale is high. Under armour, LEGO (examples)
-ve organic growth
slow,
§ Organic growth - too slow for directors who wish to maximise their salaries, rapid growth of revenues and profits
§ More difficult for firms to get new ideas.
§ Difficult to build market share if one business is already a clear leader
§ Firms might rely on the strength of the market to grow, - limit how much and how fast their can grow.
§ Sometimes another firm has market or asset which company would be unable to gain through organic growth.
§ Businesses might miss out on opportunities for ambitious growth- if rely on internal
Growth as a result of takeovers and mergers:
- A takeover is when one firm buys another firm, becomes part of the first firm (controlling interest). Agreed/
hostile - A merger is when two firms unite to form a new company. Merger – motive= synergy- more rev and cost savings
- External growth can happen through horizontal integration, vertical integration, or conglomerate integration
- Horizontal and vertical integration happen between firms in the same market
§ External growth can rapidly increase the capacity, workforce, technology, skills and assets- increasing MS. Spread
risks
§ Main motive for mergers = synergy- business after the merger is more profitable than the business before the
merger. Merged businesses = more rev/ cost savings than independent businesses. Could be synergy failure, high
risk
Growing large brings problems:
Diseconomies of scale, poor communication, organisation- only solution may be retrenchment
§ Growing companies- difficult to manage cash flow- invest in assets- less cash available for day to day expenses
§ Fast growth- risk of overtrading. Increased demand – firms have to buy more and more materials and employ
more people- they don’t have money available to pay bills. Strain on working capital. Reduce receivables, increase
payable. Growing can change it from an LTD to PLC.
(external growth) Original owners lose control (affects strategy)
Make managers shorter – termism. Shareholders see quick ROI
§ More open to a hostile takeover- controlling interest
§ Businesses need to avoid growing so much they dominate the market and become a monopoly- attracts CMA
Why businesses grow:
Increase shareholder value
§ Shareholder pressure- beyer and Monsanto
§ Increase market share
§ Growth
§ Economies of scale
Forward and backward vertical integration:
integration of firms in the same industry but at different stages in the
production process/ VALUE CHAIN
§ If merger takes the firm back towards the supplier of a good= backwards integration. Forward integration is
when the firm is moving towards the eventual consumer of a good
+ve forward and back ward integration
Firms can increase their efficiency, through gaining economies of scale- reduce their AC= lower prices.
Creates barriers to entry
§ Firms have more control of the market. Removing suppliers, crucial information from competitors- market less
contestable, taking market intelligence away. Vertical- can sell directly to public
§ Backwards integration- firms can control the price they pay for their supplies, and they could raise the price for
other firms= cost advantage over their competitors.
§ Backwards - tighter control of supply chain, can dictate who you supply to
§ Backwards - control the quality of suppliers, ensure delivery is reliable. Not concerned - exploited by suppliers,
costs low, lower prices for consumers- increase comp and sales
§ Firms have more certainty over their production, with factors such as quality, quantity, and price.
§ Less risk -suppliers don’t worry about buyers not buying their goods and buyers don’t worry about suppliers not
supplying their goods
§ Forward integration secures retail outlets - restrict access to these outlets for competitors. Better control over
retail distribution channels, build revenues