4 - Murder, Provocation & Manslaughter Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

MURDER

What is the common law definition of murder

A

the unlawful killing of a reasonable creature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

MURDER - 1) UNLAWFUL KILLING

Airedale NHS v Bland (when is death)

A

it is the cessation of brain stem activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

MURDER - 1) UNLAWFUL KILLING

AG #3 of 1994 ( what is AR for murder)

A

any intentful action which hastens death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

MURDER - 2) - Reasonable Creature

AG v X

A

Human beings are only victims of cl murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MURDER - 3) CAUSATION

r v Flynn

A

no right to expect deceased to mitigate injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

MURDER - 3) CAUSATION

R v WIlliams & Davis ( hitchiker)

A

liable where d caused deceased to act dangerouysly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

MURDER - 3) CAUSATION

R v Blaue

A

refusal mof treatment does not break chain of causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

MURDER - 4) MENS REA

s.4(1) of CJA 1990 - mens rea element

A

Intended to kill/ cause serious harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

MURDER - 4) MENS REA

s.4(2) of CJA 1990 - sub element

A

Presumed to intend - natural and probable cause of conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

MURDER - 4) MENS REA

R v Woolin

A

oblique intention is sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

MURDER - 4) MENS REA

DPP v CLifford

A

likely consequences - mr of intent is presumed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

MURDER - 5) Punishments

s.2 of CJA 1990

A

details mandatory life sentence for murder conviction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

MURDER - 5) Punishments

s.24 of Paroile Act 2019

A

eligibility of parole after 12 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

CAPITAL MURDER

DPP V Murray

A

extra mr needed - knowledge of garda/prison officer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

CAPITAL MURDER

DPP v Brady (2020)

A

Most recent cap murder - 40 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

CAPITAL MURDER

DPP v McHugh

A

40yr sentence, released after 3/4’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

MANSLAUGHTER

DEFINITION

A

all unlawful killings which do not meet murder

18
Q

MANSLAUGHTER

DPP v Healy

A

must be “unlawful and dangerous”

19
Q

MANSLAUGHTER

DPP V HORGAN

A

Any unalwful act will suffice if criminal

20
Q

MANSLAUGHTER

what standard is dangerousness set to

A

objective - reasonable person test

21
Q

Gross Negligence MANSLAUGHTER

must owe a duty of care

22
Q

Gross Negligence Manslaughter

Breach is held at objective standard

A

AG v Dunleavy

23
Q

Gross Negligence Manslaughter

Failure of SOC must have brought a v.high level of risk/danger

24
Q

Gross Negligence Manslaughter

step test to gross neg manslaughter in R v Duckenfield

A

1- must owe a doc
2- must breach
3- breach must give probability of loss of life
4- must be ther cause
5- breach must be reprehensible

25
# Dangerous Driving statutory offence
s.53 of RTA 1961
26
# dangerous driving Objectyive test for dangerous driving
DPP v Connaughton
27
# Euthanasia Fleming v Ireland
assisted suicide is illegal
28
# PROVOCATION Not a complete defence
DPP v Bourke
29
# PROVOCATION loss of control not loss of temper
DPP v Davis
30
# PROVOCATION can extreme anger be used for loss of control
yes - DPP v Curran
31
# PROVOCATION - ENgland - Objective What is the standard in R v Camplin
reasonable person with some of d's characterisitics
32
# PROVOCATION - ENgland - Objective objective requirement of behaviour which meets "societal expectations"
R v Smith
33
# PROVOCATION - Ireland - Subjective DPP v Hussein
subjective test for provaction
34
# provocative conduct must be evidenced
DPP v Davis
35
# Provocative conduct must have been done by deceased to def
DPP v Delaney
36
# provocative conduct Sufficient if A to B, B Kills C mistakenly
DPP v Doyle
37
# HEAT OF THE MOMENT Mancini v DPP
More time between = less likely to succeed
38
# PROPORTIONALITY OF PROVOCATION DPP v Hennessy
still allowed to jury if proportionate
39
# PROOF OF PROVOCATION DPP V CEKA
Up to prosecution to negate it - up for jury to decide
40
DPP v MCNAMARA Provocation
mixed test for provocation in ireland - objective test with some of d's characteristics