4 - Virtual Relationships In Social Media Flashcards

(27 cards)

1
Q

Define virtual relationships

A

Relationships that take place electronically/online, where the partners never meet face to face

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What type of language do virtual relationships lack?

A

Paralanguage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define paralanguage

A

Added extras to the way in which you speak (tone, body language, etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define self-disclosure

A

The process of revealing personal info in a relationship, that causes the relationship to become intimate and progress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the two theories about virtual relationships?

A
  • Reduced cues theory

- Hyper-personal model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Reduced Cues Theory?

A
  • Virtual relationships are LESS PERSONAL
  • Virtual relationships are less effective + personal than face to face ones, as it is hard to self-disclose and grow close to somebody
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What reasons does Reduced Cues Theory give for virtual relationships having less self-disclosure + so less closeness?

A

Less cues in speech (paralanguage)

  • Causes less sense of individual identity (de-individuation)
  • De-individuation leads to disinhibition (less control/niceties)
  • Communication becomes blunt + aggressive, so self-disclosure stops and the partners don’t become close
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who proposed the Reduced Cues Theory?

A

Sproull + Kiesler

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Hyper-Personal Model?

A
  • Virtual relationships are MORE PERSONAL
  • Theory that virtual relationships can involve greater self-disclosure and become more personal more quickly than face to face
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who proposed the Hyper-Personal Model?

A

Walther

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What reasons does Hyper-Personal Model give for virtual relationships having more self-disclosure + so more closeness?

A

Have anonymity

  • People feel comfortable that they won’t receive judgement because they have anonymity (hard to get in real life)
  • (Strangers on a train effect)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the ‘Strangers on a Train Effect’?

A

Found that you are willing to disclose more to a stranger on a train than the closest people in their lives, because they don’t fear judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Is self-disclosure truthful in the Hyper-Personal Model?

A

May be HYPERHONEST
(Presenting intensely truthful info)

More likely to be HYPERDISHONEST
(Selective self-presentation: presenting yourself in an idealised way which is false + not representative of our real self)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define selective self-presentation

A

Presenting yourself in an idealised way which is false + not representative of our real self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is reinforcement of selective self-presentation?

A

Receiver gains positive impression of sender who is selectively self-presenting themselves - this encourages them to continue lying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define a ‘gate’

A

Any feature/obstacle that could interfere with the development of a relationship

17
Q

What is the theory about virtual relationships and gating

A

There is an absence of gating in virtual relationships (no gating)

18
Q

Define NVC

A

Non-verbal communication

19
Q

Define CMC

A

Computer-mediated communication

20
Q

Who proposed absence of gating?

A

McKenna + Bargh

21
Q

Are face-to-face relationships ‘gated’?

22
Q

Why are face-to-face relationships gated?

A

Gates include: physical in attractiveness, weight, social anxiety, shyness, lack of geographical proximity

23
Q

What is the impact of the absence of gating in social relationships?

A

Gates are absent, allowing the relationship to begin and self-disclosure to start, without the distraction of superficial features
(Relationships form easier)

24
Q

What is a benefit of absence of gating?

A

Individuals are free to be themselves + form relationships without boundaries that may usually prohibit this (e.g. unattractiveness)

25
What is a drawback of absence of gating?
Individuals are more able to be deceiving about their true identity - can lie about appearance, personality etc - relationship formed on lies
26
Gove 2 positive evaluation points for virtual relationships
Virtual relationships provide an option for individuals who may otherwise not form relationships - People may struggle to form face to face relationships if they: have social anxiety, geographical isolation - Absence of gating + ability to self-disclose without judgement allows relationships to form for these individuals E.g. Peter et al - Self-report on 493 adolescents - Measured introversion/extroversion + face to face/virtual relationships - Found correlation between introversion + virtual relationships - Concluded virtual relationships are a key option for introverts - So, virtual relationships are essential for some individuals in the real world who may otherwise not form relationships Research support for absence of gating (part of theory) - Research has supported removal of gates in virtual relationships E.g. McKenna + Bargh - Looked at removal of social anxiety gate, allowing relationship formation - 71% virtual relationships formed by shy people lasted over 2 years (primary research) - 49% face to face relationships formed by shy people lasted over 2 years (secondary) - Concluded relationships have better chance of survival virtually due to absence of gating (avoiding social anxiety gate) - So, absence of gating appears to exist, with virtual relationships having to overcome fewer obstacles
27
Give 2 negative evaluation points for Virtual Relationships
Argument against virtual relationships having reduced cues - Theory suggests that virtual relationships have reduced cues (ie lack of paralanguage) + that this may lead to less self-disclosure + intimacy virtually - However, this may be incorrect - Instead of reduced cues, cues may just be different online - E.g. Timing between responses (can convey mood), acronyms (Can convey tone), emojis (can convey mood + tone) - So, virtual relationships may just have different cues - so there is a flaw in the theory + the reduced cues theory is devalued Contrasting research on the Hyperpersonal Model - Hyperpersonal Model suggests virtual involve quicker, intenser self-disclosure Whitty + Joinson: support Hyperpersonal Model - Summarised difference between self-disclosure virtually + FtF - Found: more ‘small talk’ FtF - Found: more direct questions virtually, with hyperhonesty/dishonesty in answers Ruppel et al: refutes Hyperpersonal Model - Meta analysis of 25 studies - Found: self-report of frequent, in depth self-disclosure more common in FtF relationships - So, research cannot agree on the existence of the Hyperpersonal Model, reducing the validity of the conclusion as the results aren’t always replicable